If Michael was so drawn to kids in general, why were the targets of his affection always pre pubescent boys?
Seriously? This is the hill your dying on? Defending a paedophile?
So your accusing the boys he accused of lying? You do know what your doing right, how difficult it is for victims of sexual abuse to come forward as it is, when people like you treat them like that?I'm just not down with public opinion man. The dude had two trials that he walked away from Scott free. A bunch of those who alleged were either caught lying and admitted, or retracted their statements. I think to say for sure he was a pedophile shows a surface level understanding of the situation. For every accusation and allegation there is generally a reasonable and more logical series of events. You don't have to agree with me, but I've tracked this situation for a long time
Holding hands and resting his head on Michael's shoulder was suggested by Martin Bashir, the filmerHe's holding that kids hand in the fucking video. The kid is resting his head on Michael's shoulder, talking about how they love each other. That's in a fucking public interview!!! That's what he's comfortable showing in public!!! How can you be so fucking dense?
Again, the chances every single allegation needs to be false for him to be innocent makes Occam's Razor work against you.I'm just not down with public opinion man. The dude had two trials that he walked away from Scott free. A bunch of those who alleged were either caught lying and admitted, or retracted their statements. I think to say for sure he was a pedophile shows a surface level understanding of the situation. For every accusation and allegation there is generally a reasonable and more logical series of events. You don't have to agree with me, but I've tracked this situation for a long time
I'm just not down with public opinion man. The dude had two trials that he walked away from Scott free. A bunch of those who alleged were either caught lying and admitted, or retracted their statements. I think to say for sure he was a pedophile shows a surface level understanding of the situation. For every accusation and allegation there is generally a reasonable and more logical series of events. You don't have to agree with me, but I've tracked this situation for a long time
I'm not putting words into your mouth... I'm saying all of your posts combined including that one are defensive.
Harassing... oh dear.Okay, so you're just going to keep lying and telling me I said something that I didn't. So I'm done. Stop harassing me about this.
I'm not replying to you again.
But he is accusing them of being liars. This isn't a baiting situation.The mod post clearly said we can discuss both sides of the accusation but that we should not be labeling the accusers of being liars.
That's obviously a very fine line to walk on.
But it feels like you're trying to bait him into getting banned by asking, "So you think they're liars?"
Come on. Reply to the specific things he is saying if you want to debate it with him.
The mod post clearly said we can discuss both sides of the accusation but that we should not be labeling the accusers of being liars.
That's obviously a very fine line to walk on.
But it feels like you're trying to bait him into getting banned by asking, "So you think they're liars?"
Come on. Reply to the specific things he is saying if you want to debate it with him.
Just heard it. Meh.RIP, time flew by hella fast.
So many iconic songs.
Absolutely love The Weeknd's rendition of Dirty Diana.
Who the fuck cares? Do you hear how they're talking about each other? Michael talking about how late he calls them.Holding hands and resting his head on Michael's shoulder was suggested by Martin Bashir, the filmer
He said they were "caught lying".The mod post clearly said we can discuss both sides of the accusation but that we should not be labeling the accusers of being liars.
That's obviously a very fine line to walk on.
But it feels like you're trying to bait him into getting banned by asking, "So you think they're liars?"
Come on. Reply to the specific things he is saying if you want to debate it with him.
I still have not seen this HBO doc -- and tbh I'm not sure how much I could stomach watching four hours of accounts of child molestation -- but the turnaround on MJ this year has struck me as really strange, given that the accusations against him have been around for nearly my entire life. Maybe the doc has some damning new evidence that nobody had heard/seen before, but to me the basic underlying charge of "Michael Jackson sexually abused boys at his Neverland ranch" has been basically baked into my perception of him for decades already and it didn't strike me as anything new, so it was weird that it seemed like a lot of other people were shocked or went "ok, can't listen to his music anymore now."
As far as mental gymnastics go, "if he was gifted child pornography and kept it, well that's not a problem" really takes the cake.
Yeah I kinda see that. I've never listened to his music (in the sense of choosing to listen to it as opposed to hearing it in passing) but I've always had the perception in my mind that he was a child abuser, don't know why. The only thing that comes to mind is when they took jabs at him in family guy.I still have not seen this HBO doc -- and tbh I'm not sure how much I could stomach watching four hours of accounts of child molestation -- but the turnaround on MJ this year has struck me as really strange, given that the accusations against him have been around for nearly my entire life. Maybe the doc has some damning new evidence that nobody had heard/seen before, but to me the basic underlying charge of "Michael Jackson sexually abused boys at his Neverland ranch" has been basically baked into my perception of him for decades already and it didn't strike me as anything new, so it was weird that it seemed like a lot of other people were shocked or went "ok, can't listen to his music anymore now."
As far as mental gymnastics go, "if he was gifted child pornography and kept it, well that's not a problem" really takes the cake.
Fuck Michael Jackon and fuck anyone defending him. Try watching that video and claiming he's innocent.
We are discussing it, which we are allowed to do. A court decision or lack thereof has nothing to do with anything.Are you trying to bait a ban? This is a matter for the courts to decide, not you nor the person you're replying to and that's the biggest shame here. That this will never go to court and as a result there will never be closure regarding these accusations.
But he is accusing them of being liars. This isn't a baiting situation.
If it means Michael ends up not having easy access to young children to molest, yes, it is worth not having Beat It.I've always wondered , what is this boards opinion on Joe Jackson? From everything I've heard he was very abusive to the kids and the argument I always hear from people is that if he didn't push his kids the way he did they never would have become good musicians. In an alternate universe if you take Joe out of the equation, music from the Jackson family would never exist. Would you make that change?
Are you trying to bait a ban? This is a matter for the courts to decide, not you nor the person you're replying to and that's the biggest shame here. That this will never go to court and as a result there will never be closure regarding these accusations.
He described accusers as "caught lying" and got banned. You wanna die on that hill?Are you trying to bait a ban? This is a matter for the courts to decide, not you nor the person you're replying to and that's the biggest shame here. That this will never go to court and as a result there will never be closure regarding these accusations.
He isn't the king of pop anymore though. Being a child rapist kind of makes you lose that crown.The King of pop and he will never lose that title
Shit was a sad day when he passed, every car for a week straight was pumping his music. It was crazy.
*for someHe isn't the king of pop anymore though. Being a child rapist kind of makes you lose that crown.
I don't think the majority of the population gives a fuck to be honest. He probably did some creepy shit but his catalogue is still fire.He isn't the king of pop anymore though. Being a child rapist kind of makes you lose that crown.
When the majority of the population is ashamed to listen to the music of a child rapist can you be considered a king?
He isn't the king of pop anymore though. Being a child rapist kind of makes you lose that crown.
We are discussing it, which we are allowed to do. A court decision or lack thereof has nothing to do with anything.
People are discussing it sure, but it will be endlessly debated without end this time as we see EVERY time there is a new MJ topic.
YupMichael's face and body language when that kid starts telling the story about "if you love me, you'll sleep with me" reads like "Oh fuck, shut the fuck up, you lit'le tat'tletale! Now I gotta fake smile for the camera and pretend like it's an innocent and endearing story of which I'm not ashamed in the least..."
Beyond reasonable doubt, he is guilty. Legal keywords in bold. There is no need to "trust or not".it never been confirmed because we don't have proof beside accusation, so in the end, you only decide if you trust him or not
Imagine not giving a fuck that in that time he mentally and physically abused children.I still listen to his music from time to time and the passage of time hasn't changed my opinion of him. I consider him a musical icon then and now. Like so many great artists he died far too soon.
I hope so. The debate doesn't need to end just so people can feel better about the person or topic at handPeople are discussing it sure, but it will be endlessly debated without end this time as we see EVERY time there is a new MJ topic.
proof?Beyond reasonable doubt, he is guilty. Legal keywords in bold. There is no need to "trust or not".
Do you believe the accusers in Leaving Neverland?