yea exactly!Any reviewer incorporating the storefront controversy in their scoring should be blacklisted IMHO. That would be some irresponsible shit.
that doesn't tell me anything if it actually affects their score
yea exactly!Any reviewer incorporating the storefront controversy in their scoring should be blacklisted IMHO. That would be some irresponsible shit.
Any reviewer incorporating the storefront controversy in their scoring should be blacklisted IMHO. That would be some irresponsible shit.
90+ would be amazing but it seems like s pipe dream. I think it will get mid 80s.
This is a game forum, why can't people have fun posting about a game's score? It's a good conversation piece.
Any reviewer incorporating the storefront controversy in their scoring should be blacklisted IMHO. That would be some irresponsible shit.
A. It's not fun. B. It's not a good conversation piece at all, it just ends up as a list of fucking pointless numbers. C. I'm aware this is a games forum.This is a game forum, why can't people have fun posting about a game's score? It's a good conversation piece.
Any reviewer that does this shit should be motherfucking fired, period. Same for those who put personal feelings and opinions ahead of the game itself. Shit like this is just bullshit and why you can't/shouldn't take reviews seriously. Hopefully though, no reviewer actually does this.
I don't think that's a pipe dream at all.
I actually think that would be kind of accurate, if reviewers that don't like this kind of game keep their mouths shut or get a bit more objective.
I knew the worldbuilding, graphics, story and 'open world' implementation was great, but I read the gunplay seems to be great too, so that only leaves the AI and the bugs to be reviewed in a possible negative way.
Dang, you seem really dislike Metacritic threads. Metro has been hot news lately so I can understand why this thread was made.A. It's not fun. B. It's not a good conversation piece at all, it just ends up as a list of fucking pointless numbers. C. I'm aware this is a games forum.
If you can't take reviews seriously because they have personal opinions in them then I don't think you understand the purpose of the reviews.Any reviewer that does this shit should be motherfucking fired, period. Same for those who put personal feelings and opinions ahead of the game itself. Shit like this is just bullshit and why you can't/shouldn't take reviews seriously. Hopefully though, no reviewer actually does this.
People on this site care way more about pointless aggregate numbers than the actual content of reviews. It's not conducive to good discussion imo.Dang, you seem really dislike Metacritic threads. Metro has been hot news lately so I can understand why this thread was made.
People on this site care way more about pointless aggregate numbers than the actual content of reviews. It's not conducive to good discussion imo.
I can't comprehend the idea of guessing metacritic scores to be "fun" in any way shape or form
Like you have to have a really, really boring life for that to be considered fun
That blanket statement...Nah, my life is pretty damn good and very enjoyable. I like reading Metacritic threads. I see nothing wrong with that, just like I see nothing wrong with your opinion.I can't comprehend the idea of guessing metacritic scores to be "fun" in any way shape or form
Like you have to have a really, really boring life for that to be considered fun
I can't comprehend the idea of guessing metacritic scores to be "fun" in any way shape or form
Like you have to have a really, really boring life for that to be considered fun
If you hate these threads then don't comment.People on this site care way more about pointless aggregate numbers than the actual content of reviews. It's not conducive to good discussion imo.
This is more like a review prediction thread since no outlets with the exception of one have posted a review.
It's not doing much new or significantly different to the previous games so 80-85.
A prettier bigger version of Metro isn't gonna make for a 95.