Yes. Read the credits.
It's 2:30pm where I live. I'm not insane. I'm not unbalanced, I'm not suffering from sleep deprivation. These weren't good games. They were ugly, slow, poorly animated, poorly told, ran poorly, and made it difficult to play with friends. They sold fantastically, in spite of bad decisions, bad engineering, bad writing, low ambition, and mismanagement. I don't have a stake in this. I'm trying to avoid doing work at an office job, same as anyone else on this forum. I'm stating my opinion and offering analysis. There is no reasonable person who can compare these games to comparable selling Switch titles and not see obvious, clear deficiencies in presentation, performance, and quality. It is uncommon for a game this below par to achieve these sales. Pokemon is a powerful brand, and TPCI is well run. I would argue, based on their output, that GameFreak is delivering increasingly poor games with no credible excuse for their quality.
They didn't live up to the previous entries. Their sales are out of alignment with the quality, polish, and ambition that are normally rewarded in the market. It is extremely anomalous. It's disappointing to me, because I hate mobile games, and the clear desire of TPCI to be a licensing company for a mostly mobile game-oriented property, with subscriptions and a high value cross-media operation makes good business sense, but it disappoints me as a person who played these games a lot as I grew up. Markets don't always reward things that align with your values though. I don't know why you think that calling these games low quality implies mental instability.
Pokemon Sword and Shield got positive reviews by games journalists, who are all but uniformly industry cheerleaders with the critical sense of a slug. Call of Duty gets 9s too, and so does FIFA. Most major franchises are essentially untouchable by game reviewers, because no publication will stake their reputation on trying to go against the grain. They put up the review that's not going to piss off publishers. Being paid to give your opinion only makes your opinion more visible, it means very little about the opinion itself, except maybe that it's for sale.
It got amazing sales in a games market dominated by skinner boxes and financial self-abuse. A critical opinion isn't about what other people think and do.
I don't know how anyone could construe my arguments as having a claim at objectivity. Honestly, it's an airing of grievances. Disliking something doesn't mean you're disinvited from talking about it. I gave that game at least a dozen hours and 60 dollars. It was sloppy, and it was made with cynicism and contempt.