These types of sweeping guidelines have worked out so well in the past and will definitely fix things.Let's see how the threads are moderated going forward. They weren't really moderated at all, trolls or regulars, in the past. If bad faith posters (actual bad faith posters, not people who are curious about the market but aren't as knowledgeable) continue to go unactioned, I'm sure cvxfreak will take a look at it.
The rules are flexible/amenable if they don't work out for the better or cause other issues.
XboxEra too.These types of sweeping guidelines have worked out so well in the past and will definitely fix things.
*looks at PC Era, AsiaEra and Trans Era*
I just don't have any faith in that.
Except that this is exactly what most of us want. If bad posters were actually banned on a consistent basis in the first place, these rules wouldn't have to be in place.They weren't really moderated at all, trolls or regulars, in the past.
No comment in 6 minutes since thread was re-opened. Says it all really. Wonder how long it would've lasted if I wasn't impatient to make a point lol.
eff me. And I don't curse often...
No comment in 6 minutes since thread was re-opened. Says it all really. Wonder how long it would've lasted if I wasn't impatient to make a point lol.
eff me. And I don't curse often...
I really didn't see anyone do this though. People were just comparing the behaviour of the staff, they weren't comparing the issues of minority communities with sales data. I don't think it's fair to those people to pretend otherwise.Official Staff CommunicationIt also shouldn't jump the line into equating the issues of minority communities with video game sales data.
I really didn't see anyone do this though. People were just comparing the behaviour of the staff, they weren't comparing the issues of minority communities with sales data. I don't think it's fair to those people to pretend otherwise.
Not gonna lie, it's hard to read the staff post as anything other than endorsement for the pro-PlayStation trolling that's been plaguing this thread for a while.
I'm actually kinda befuddled sony has been funding SQE like this, final fantasy sells well obviously but not like it's all that consistent, one game has sold like 8 million somehow but another game that was probably pretty expensive has sold atleast 5 million but square hasent gloated about it's sales since.
Obviously it's all about the long term but If their goal is to have the jrpg/anime market in their advantage then it's not going great, because Sony is essentially just helping fund games like FF and such, they aren't paying any real attention to smaller games like atelier or disgaea. The jrpg market isn't just final fantasy and square games anymore. There's alot of smaller ones out that are now even selling better on PC and switch.
Along with that but as games like fire emblem, persona, SMT, Xenoblade, etc. Continue to grow, square's importance continues to dinimish
I really don't see a single mod action in this thread that seems reasonable outside of the thread lock, TBHI don't think the appropriate actions were taken or reacted in a thoughtful way, tbh.
I think the best thing we can do for the rest of the night/morning is try to talk about sales. Even if we were to give feedback on guidelines, I don't think any of us, mods included, are cooled off enough yet.
Hopefully if and when Chris comes back we can have a thorough discussion about the rules and how they affect both sides of this situation.
Not saying we should just forget, just that note might not be the best time for discussion regarding the recent bans and such. Right now a lot us are in emotional mind and we would all communicate our thoughts better when we return to our rational minds. Even if what we're saying may be valid, it's likely to come out the wrong way and result in more bans or regretful comments.It's pretty difficult to just pretend this never happened and just jump back into sales discussion, people are heated and want to have their say about a community we all care about. Things might cool down and we can hopefully get back to what this thread should be about.
More PlayStation 4s were sold than Xbox Ones that is a fact. Actually it's maybe a fact since Xbox now hides console sale numbers but I doubt they sold 118m Xbox Ones.The narrative in Western media is quite clear, painting Playstation as the undisputed market leader worldwide, that actual information is available that clearly demonstrates the opposite in certain markets is a thorn to a lot of eyes. Even Microsoft/Xbox has to deal with this unfair treatment, despite of their immense financial resources. That's also a reason that quite a few people would like less data and would be even favourable for MediaCreate Threads to disappear just to push their misleading marketing narrative with no contradiction . Because with verifiable data you can call out, misleading narrative. That there seems to be a push to position specific corporations and their leaders above criticism is very unfortunate. You can criticise Nintendo and Xbox all you want in many threads, but IT IS obvious where often the actual lines are drawn and it's obvious to whose favour and whose detriment these lines are drawn, there is a clear parttern.
Never realized Tri-crescendo worked on Berseria and now Arise. This feels so weird to read considering the history between Namco and Wolf Team that lead to the creation of Tri-Crescendo and Tri-Ace.
and if you feel someone is incorrect in their interpretation of data, constructively correct them (in as much detail as possible) instead of mocking them. Make yourself useful, not disruptive.
No need to get all emotional because of a days ban. I'll follow these threads where ever they go but this has been a much better place for these discussions then the old place for example. There the mods actively participated and gave out bans for pretty much any opinion that was a different from theirs and people were quickly labeled as fanboys. Man I hated that place.
Yeah CVX is open to discussion. But of course this won't stop the reactions to some of the actions by moderation here.Regardless of past experiences with other threads, I doubt cvxfreak appreciates people assuming motivations or putting words in their mouth. I asked him some questions to clarify some of the rules and the answers I got were that the team was open to feedback and the rules would apply to all.
by saying that this thread is doomed to fail, it makes light of cvxfreak's comments, which I don't think they would appreciate.
if we say the mods are unlikely to change and that they've doomed these weekly threads…well you're sure as hell unlikely to convince them to come to the table to discuss bans, conduct, and rules going forward. We should at least give them a fair opportunity to prove their statements true.
It took me some time in my long "Forums' member career", but some day I came to the conclusion that the ignore list is the best.Yup
Until now, I had most of what I see as the bad players on ignore, but I could see the quote stubs for the ignored members (causing me to look at ignored content from time to time out of curiosity, always regretting it later).
After these new guidelines, and since I expect the hot takes to get worse (though I hope I am wrong), every time someone even gives a slight hint of bad faith I will put them on ignore, AND more importantly I have changed my settings to "Fully remove all traces of ignored members". So far the latter seems to really improve the thread for me, even more so than before when I just had some people on ignore.
Same.
Yeah that is definitely true for some of the regular posters here. Some think they have a patent on the thread or something. I can name a select few that think their opinion is the only truth there is but I won't for the sake of being nice to people.As someone who enjoys lurking these threads, I have to say there is absolutely an incredible amount of condescension on display from the regulars. It's shy of outright stating 'if you thought x would sell better than y you are either a troll or a stupid idiot', but that is often the message.
Just my $0.02
I think for a lot of people there is a suspicion that the ban Chris got was an example of exactly this though. Seeing as people who were trolling other people, and doing it way more often, didn't even get a warning.There the mods actively participated and gave out bans for pretty much any opinion that was a different from theirs
It's a 1 day ban. We don't know if he will return. He was banned for some snarky posts and trolling.OK..what is going on here? Chris ist banned? Like, forever? What is going on? Just read the staff post, and i am really sad what is going on. I'm sorry for asking, but why is Chris banned? I tried to find out, but dont get it.
Will the MC Threads continue?
No matter what happens this won't end Resetera as a whole (not the same situation but even the other site still exists, haha), but depending on how things proceed it could end the MC threads as we know them (and so the main motivation for coming to Resetera for an unknown number of posters/lurkers). If that happens, any replacement Japan sales thread in Resetera will most likely look quite similar to the Japan sales thread on the other site (not a sight to behold...),
I think the guidelines are fair, and if they actually ended up working to the detriment of the thread, we are happy to hear feedback and adjust moving forward.
In general this is not the direction I was expecting this to go lol. There are people who post in these threads every week who are not very subtle at all about their bad faith posting and trolling and I guess I thought that was going to be the target of the rules. Didn't expect to go in the opposite direction. You guys had a whole thread of people rallying around low NMH3 sales for console war reasons and didn't give a single shit.
it just never works when moderation sets big sweeping guidelines like this for a community without consulting the members, specially those who contribute a lot to them. like it or not, some members ARE more important (and their contributions have been the reason these threads have existed and been popular for years) and their opinion on what will improve them is important. i fully agree that these threads could be better when it comes to treating newcomers, and having more patience with them, but if you've been paying close (or not so close) attention for the past few years, there are people who aren't happy with the actual and factual data being posted here. that is not something the regulars can help with. there are console warriors who don't like the data we get and would rather no one talked and analyzed the actual data. of course the solution for them is just to ignore the threads, but they don't do that and would instead invest a lot of time subtly and not-so-subtly derail the threads and troll in them with bad faith questions and arguments. so IF the new guidelines are kinda made to appease them (which to me, it looks like they are) it's really bad for the community. i'm sure the intention of the moderation is good and they want to make everyone happy. but when there's a years long campaign against these threads, in and out of them, it doesn't feel right when the guidelines are influenced by those who don't actually like the community or feel part of it.
Wow, I mean I respect you plenty but this is clearly missing the point.
No comments about drive-by posters which drop their hot take and are not answering to any of the replies ?
And how are these guidelines protecting the thread against any bad faith argument ? Trolls could prosper under the cover of "I don't have enough knowledge" despite participating in every thread for months.
What kind of signal are you sending by banning the founder of this thread whereas casual hostility against the whole MC community goes unchecked ?
And finally, how are Harada/Nagoshi & co given an immunity status when people were free to dash on Mochizuki's reporting because it didn't suit them ?
I can't stress enough how you are setting a terrible precedent here. Giving more ammo and validation to the bad faith posters isn't going to give you less passive-aggressiveness, but more.
Really disappointed by the mods. Yes, tone can sometimes be an issue in this threads but even as a irregular lurker I've seen drive-by'a and trolling under the guise of "just asking questions" going unchecked so many times I have respect for long time posters here not loosing it more often. Compared to how this community is depicted outside of this thread without any consequences ever is sad to see.
How can you set out and create a set of rules for a community without consulting it's most active parts and the sole reason this community exists in the way it does? Especially if you think they should behave differently? How do think that goes over with a tight knit group of people that have been on the receiving end of a lot of shit for years?
I can only hope Chris comes back and mods will actually try to create guidelines together with each individual community and their peers instead going over their heads each and every time because I don't want to lose the sole reason to visit this forum anymore.
Feels like the first mod post stemmed from a lack of familiarity with this community, which provoked a unanimous negative reaction from regulars, then the moderation doubled down on their mistake with a slew of bans directed at the wrong people. This community is possibly in jeopardy due to a lack of understanding of the real problems these threads had been facing. If the moderation admits their unfamiliarity with a community and all the regulars of said community react negatively to the moderation's decisions, that should be a big sign that doubling down on that is not the answer. Bad night for the Media Create community, and I think a huge mistake on the moderation's part.
Accusations that companies or creators/developers are showing favoritism for or bias against certain companies (i.e. Nagoshi, Harada, Nihon Falcom, etc. for Sony/against Nintendo) are not allowed unless there is evidence supporting such accusations.