Edibles can vary in strength. It makes no sense to say they are very strong.Is this your first time with Edibles? Edibles are really strong.
Call an Uber next time for Christ sakes.
Yeah. I calculated the BAC that two Mike's would result in, two hours after consumption.
I mean, the legal limit in the U.S. puts drivers at a 2.5 times higher risk of being involved serious traffic accidents compared to driving sober. So I'd say it's definitely too lax. The Swedish limit kicks in before any increase in traffic risk. Which I'm personally more comfortable with.The US law is definitely too lax but it seems like the Sweden law is a bit too strict if 2 hours after drinking two Mike's hards for a normal weight person is enough to get a DUI.
😉
That person made a joke about getting roofied and raped. They deserved it.People getting banned for "hostility" when the person to whom they're being "hostile" drove home under the influence. Don't wanna hurt his feelings, I guess.
People getting banned for "hostility" when the person to whom they're being "hostile" drove home under the influence. Don't wanna hurt his feelings, I guess.
No, people got banned for these posts:That person made a joke about getting roofied and raped. They deserved it.
OP could've murdered someone, what the fuck.
Don't fucking drive after drinking AND consuming fucking edibles you piece of shit.
- takes drugs
- drives home
- thinks they've been drugged
single digit IQ here, folks.
Doing drugs with strangers without prior experience is nuts to me.
That person made a joke about getting roofied and raped. They deserved it.
Feels like an overreaction to this thread, except this is a case where the OP absolutely deserves the shit they're being given.People getting banned for "hostility" when the person to whom they're being "hostile" drove home under the influence. Don't wanna hurt his feelings, I guess.
Ah, they must've been banned after I turned the page.
.
Everyone who ever murdered someone while driving impaired "felt good enough to drive."
Yep, I don't understand this either.
Yep, I don't understand this either.
Are we gonna be supporting people doing reckless stuff? Wtf Era? The implications are really bad here...
FYI you can criticize someone's actions without calling them a piece of shitYep, I don't understand this either.
Are we gonna be supporting people doing reckless stuff? Wtf Era? The implications are really bad here...
You honestly can't see a difference between not supporting reckless people and saying fuck you you piece of shit? Seriously?Yep, I don't understand this either.
Are we gonna be supporting people doing reckless stuff? Wtf Era? The implications are really bad here...
Okay that's fair enough, I guess I'm jaded to reading those personal attacks as I ignore those aspectsFYI you can criticize someone's actions without calling them a piece of shit
Mikes hard lemonade shouldn't put him over the limit if he waited two hours.Seems like the drugs let you sober up faster, because being sober 2 hours after the last drink is definetly very fast. Good Job OP.
Edibles can vary in strength. It makes no sense to say they are very strong.
And don't assume that it takes 1-2 hours to kick in like some have in this thread. Depends on the person, the strength, the style of edible etc.Err on the side of caution when trying any new drug the first time. And strong or not, don't get behind the wheel after taking them.
Make him think about the consequences of his actions, perhaps? Placid, half-assed criticisms only do so much to inspire genuine change.
Being high will do that to youIt's pretty funny he thinks he was roofied when he knows he had edibles.
And don't assume that it takes 1-2 hours to kick in like some have in this thread. Depends on the person, the strength, the style of edible etc.
I've had ones that took 90 minutes and I've had ones that take 10-15min.
Official Staff CommunicationThe timeline of events as laid out by the OP and reaffirmed by other members, as well as a determination by another member in the thread that the OP's BAC was too low to break the legal threshold in America, means we do not believe the OP posed a serious threat to other drivers on the road. Furthermore, the OP has agreed that his decisions were reckless. Ultimately, we do not condone driving under the influence; anyone who wants to criticize and/or educate the OP for driving home after having consumed edibles is free to do so. Continued hostility towards the OP will be moderated as such.
But again, OP already knows that what he did was wrong.
And what are you saying, that insulting someone is the only way for your criticism to get through? That's nonsense. There's absolutely no need to pop into a thread and just drop a "you're a piece of shit OP" post.
Official Staff CommunicationThe timeline of events as laid out by the OP and reaffirmed by other members, as well as a determination by another member in the thread that the OP's BAC was too low to break the legal threshold in America, means we do not believe the OP posed a serious threat to other drivers on the road. Furthermore, the OP has agreed that his decisions were reckless. Ultimately, we do not condone driving under the influence; anyone who wants to criticize and/or educate the OP for driving home after having consumed edibles is free to do so. Continued hostility towards the OP will be moderated as such.
this is bizarre to me to say the least.
You say that you don't believe the OP posed a serious threat to other road users yet the first post of the thread doesn't portray a logical and fully functioning mindset sober enough to be behind the wheel of a few tonnes of metal!
They were clearly freaking out and not thinking straight, that's a huge threat to other people on the road
Official Staff CommunicationThe timeline of events as laid out by the OP and reaffirmed by other members, as well as a determination by another member in the thread that the OP's BAC was too low to break the legal threshold in America, means we do not believe the OP posed a serious threat to other drivers on the road. Furthermore, the OP has agreed that his decisions were reckless. Ultimately, we do not condone driving under the influence; anyone who wants to criticize and/or educate the OP for driving home after having consumed edibles is free to do so. Continued hostility towards the OP will be moderated as such.
Not the only way for criticism to hit home, no. I believe that the level of vitriol should be appropriate to the level of the offense. Consuming edibles and driving home, to me, should earn a good slap in the face by reality. "Don't do that again, OP," doesn't really cut it for me. My wife and I got sideswiped a couple of Thanksgivings by a fucking drunk, so I really, truly hope his friends and family were more critical than making frowny faces and suggesting he not drive drunk again.
I ain't calling OP a piece of shit, but I don't blame others who do.