PROTIP: click on the twitter profile to reveal the secretshmm lets see a person I never heard of have claims with no cited sources.
What not to get?
Regardless who he is, there's nothing showed backing up his claims =/
He's the video game industry analyst of the NPD group. Market research is literally his job.
As a consumer why the fuck should I care about publishing margins?
Sigh ... Reset the clock.I think it's probably good for developers who want 88% instead of 70%, lol.
What does Valve do that deserves 30% of the revenue. They're just a store. Stores should never have 30% margins.
It depends on the good, and in teh case of videogames physical stores get 25% of the videogame price (according to Ubisoft).
NPD requires people to pay for their data. They used to be a little bit more generous, but he's not going to share numbers publicly. But his comments are based off the results.Regardless who he is, there's nothing showed backing up his claims =/
I preferred it how it was before steam.Not good but not unexpected.
I hate having a dozen launchers for games.
Admittedly, I did buy everything I wanted on PC last year, launchers be damned. But for a lot of people it's too much BS and I agree.
Competition is great, but things were a lot simpler when it was basically just Steam. Maybe if everyone else tries bringing their storefronts and featured up a few notches it would be better. I honestly don't love any of the PC launchers from a usability standpoint besides Steam. I suppose "these things take time" and I hope if EGS is here to stay, they put in the work to make the experience a lot better than it is today (don't get me wrong it's functional, but that's about it).
Because you want content creators to have less risk, make more money and be able to continue to make more games? Especially smaller ones for whom those margins could make all the difference.
Steam isn't only a storeI don't understand how "Stores don't deserve 30% margins" is a hot take.
Outside of this one specific fight online, this is accepted pretty much literally everywhere else.
I don't understand how "Stores don't deserve 30% margins" is a hot take.
Outside of this one specific fight online, this is accepted pretty much literally everywhere else.
You said "What does Valve do that deserves 30% of the revenue. They're just a store. Stores should never have 30% margins". It's 2020. That entire narrative has been buried several thousand feet underground and the entire discussion about EGS has moved past it. I feel silly for even responding, to be honest. You're woefully behind on the discussion if you're still spewing "it's just a store" out and thinking it's anything other than word vomit.I don't understand how "Stores don't deserve 30% margins" is a hot take.
Outside of this one specific fight online, this is accepted pretty much literally everywhere else.
I preferred it how it was before steam.
No launcher just install the game and go. Quick search to see if there's an update. Steam is the reason I slowly stopped gaming on PC.
I hesitate to buy Indie games now, cause Epic gives me them for free.
You can do this with GOG. You can do it with some Steam games too actually.I preferred it how it was before steam.
No launcher just install the game and go. Quick search to see if there's an update. Steam is the reason I slowly stopped gaming on PC.
Not really the problem but ok.There are certain people and sites who thinks that more PC platforms means more "competition" therefore it must be good.
yeah but this just doesn't really work with a digital economyI preferred it how it was before steam.
No launcher just install the game and go. Quick search to see if there's an update. Steam is the reason I slowly stopped gaming on PC.
If all these companies who think a 30% cut is killing them would do this I'd never complain about games not coming to Steam again. Having all their games purchasable and updatable through Playnite or GOG Galaxy 2 would be amazing. But they'll never do it so I will continue just waiting for their stuff to hit Steam.I would like them to expose their stores as a api that third party launcher can consume. They can implement "one" store that connects all stores into one ui. U have all your games in there, can buy all your games from there and it's optimized for desktop and TV mode. I'm pretty sure there would be an awesome open source project if this would happen.
Now you're just trolling.I mean, it's also DRM I guess?
But store+DRM probably doesn't need margins like this for positive economic profit.
I don't understand how "Stores don't deserve 30% margins" is a hot take.
Outside of this one specific fight online, this is accepted pretty much literally everywhere else.
I did have a massive folder full of games on various types of disks. Im still mostly physical I like to manage things myself where possible. Stuck in my ways!Those days were fine too :)
My first PC game was Civilization on seven 3.5 floppy discs lol!
Before Steam was ok but I did hate having to keep track of keys for games. I basically had a giant tote with all the boxes stored for future use if needed. I was drug kicking and screaming away from physical games, but over the years I've found it to be much simpler and Steam surely had a lot to do with that. Only physical I buy now are some Switch games if I find good deals, and that's ok.
It's much more than that, but you already know it.I mean, it's also DRM I guess?
But store+DRM probably doesn't need margins like this for positive economic profit.
I've not tried gog for some time. I think the last time was the very first galaxy beta. I should look into it again.You can do this with GOG. You can do it with some Steam games too actually.
Oh I totally understand that. I can't even remember where I used to download updates from now it was that long ago. Think the last game I put significant time into on PC was ut 2k3yeah but this just doesn't really work with a digital economy
you need storefronts. adhoc websites for every video game just isn't viable and the exposure for them would be awful
a storefront like steam is a necessity and if it wasn't valve it was always going to be someone else
I did have a massive folder full of games on various types of disks. Im still mostly physical I like to manage things myself where possible. Stuck in my ways!
Why would you use Galaxy if you want a launcher-less experience? You can just download the games from the website.I've not tried gog for some time. I think the last time was the very first galaxy beta. I should look into it again.
I think it's probably good for developers who want 88% instead of 70%, lol.
What does Valve do that deserves 30% of the revenue. They're just a store. Stores should never have 30% margins.
The last couple of days of revived EGS discussion has me all
I think they were more talking about that you don't need to use a launcher for any GOG games, just run the setup and it's installed like the good old days pre-launchers with no storefront/launcher/platform dependencies.I've not tried gog for some time. I think the last time was the very first galaxy beta. I should look into it again.
I'm with you on this.Anecdotally adding that I did not buy quite a few games on EGS while I wait for the Steam releases.
I'm not against EGS btw, I use Origin and Battle.net on the regular, I'm boycotting Epic for abandoning UT.
It just kinda sounds like launcher and store need to be decoupled, honestly.
Through allowing developers to generate (nearly) infinite keys for free, Steam has basically already done what you've asked for. It's a large part of the reason why people are still pissed at Epic hoarding timed exclusives, as it meant fewer retailers selling the game and subsequently higher prices. Of course, then Epic then spent millions of dollars subsidising their sales, which strikes me as self-defeating.I would like them to expose their stores as a api that third party launcher can consume. They can implement "one" store that connects all stores into one ui. U have all your games in there, can buy all your games from there and it's optimized for desktop and TV mode. I'm pretty sure there would be an awesome open source project if this would happen.
there are enough people out there that think that if it's digital, it has no carbon footprintThis isn't a Steam thing. The standard for app sales is 30%. Go crusade about how the App Store and Google Play need to be nicer to developers.
It's not even a digital distribution thing, as it's approximately the same cut for retail sales. You're just flaunting profound ignorance on the subject.
Yeah, the good ol' days of:The last couple of days of revived EGS discussion has me all
This whole EGS discussion is an ouroboros.
I think they were more talking about that you don't need to use a launcher for any GOG games, just run the setup and it's installed like the good old days pre-launchers with no storefront/launcher/platform dependencies.
Prices went up because Epic bought exclusivity and were the only place you could get the game.If competition is higher and prices are lower, of course people will spend less. I feel like I'm missing something here.
.
Yeah, the good ol' days of:
Install from disc media => input serial => store serial forever => keep cd in drive
or ...
search web for no CD crack => hope and pray it's not a virus => fuck it was a virus => reinstall OS => retrieve OS serial from safe place
So be it, there needs to be competition when it comes to PC launchers and storefronts
hmm lets see a person I never heard of have claims with no cited sources.
What not to get?
Regardless who he is, there's nothing showed backing up his claims =/
What are they competing for if the result is people spending less?So be it, there needs to be competition when it comes to PC launchers and storefronts