Didn't see one, and I assume not like the movie everyone is paying attention to, but guess review embargo is up.
It's going well
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/mary-poppins-returns-review-1167792
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...t-endlessly-charming-iconic-nanny/2278478002/
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-mary-poppins-review-20181212-story.html
https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/12/entertainment/mary-poppins-returns-review/index.html
https://www.seattletimes.com/entert...m_medium=social&utm_campaign=article_left_1.1
https://ew.com/movie-reviews/2018/12/12/mary-poppins-returns-ew-review/
https://www.vulture.com/2018/12/mary-poppins-returns-review.html
It's going well
Whether it's exploding into large-scale production numbers or closing in on intimate scenes of a family in crisis, the sequel captivates by adopting a time-honored Disney formula that combines the joy and imagination of childhood with an underlay of melancholy. Its old-fashioned, honest sentimentality plasters a smile across your face and plants a tear in your eye, often simultaneously. All that should make this a winning family entry for the holidays and a repeat-viewing favorite for years to come. At 130 minutes, it might be a tad too long to stop the littlest kids from fidgeting, but then Mary Poppins was even longer, and that never hurt its popularity.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/mary-poppins-returns-review-1167792
P.L. Travers' practically perfect nanny is back in the perfectly fine sequel "Mary Poppins Returns" , with Emily Bluntcarrying the magic carpet bag and living up to the high bar Julie Andrews set in 1964's original "Poppins." While narratively no match for the classic Disney musical, the new "Mary" adds new songs and multitalented charisma machine Lin-Manuel Miranda to the mix for one undoubtedly comforting nostalgia-fest.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...t-endlessly-charming-iconic-nanny/2278478002/
It fails through no lack of effort. Magee borrows instantly recognizable elements from the earlier film, but he also draws heavily on the superb P.L. Travers books that inspired it, particularly "Mary Poppins Comes Back" (1935) and "Mary Poppins Opens the Door" (1943). Real inspiration, however, proves elusive. The laborious Depression-era plot brings together a house in disarray, a looming bank foreclosure and a few scowling cardboard villains. The score, composed by Marc Shaiman, is as hardworking as it is monotonous; the new songs crowd together inside your head, coalescing into a thick, vaguely melodic vapor that evaporates immediately after the movie has ended.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-mary-poppins-review-20181212-story.html
"Mary Poppins Returns" could just as easily be titled "Mary Poppins Remade." That's not a bad thing, necessarily, but a movie that descends from the clouds with a huge gust of nostalgia behind it only sporadically conjures magic between the title character's arrival and departure. The result is thus perfectly passable, but well short of practically perfect.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/12/entertainment/mary-poppins-returns-review/index.html
But I'll just end the suspense right here: "Mary Poppins Returns," made with palpable love for its predecessor, is glorious and gorgeous, and I adored it. (And I cried, more than once; if Mary Poppins was your magical nanny long ago, you might, too.)
https://www.seattletimes.com/entert...m_medium=social&utm_campaign=article_left_1.1
Director and cowriter Rob Marshall (Into the Woods, Chicago) clearly understands the legacy he's taken on, filling nearly every corner of the screen with song and dance and tweedy whimsy — even a featured sequence done entirely in the flat '60s-style animation of the original. But he doesn't seem to quite know how to find a storytelling spine to match Mary's famous rigor; the narrative feels spindly and slightly adrift, a parasol in the wind. And an easy solution for its central stakes — the family must find a misplaced deed by the midnight deadline, or lose their beloved home — is never in doubt.
https://ew.com/movie-reviews/2018/12/12/mary-poppins-returns-ew-review/
After that, I stayed with the movie a long time — longer than it deserved, really — but its spell had begun to dissipate the instant Mary's feet touched terra firma. Mary Poppins Returns is a work of painstaking re-creation, and it's full of nice touches. But it's a bit of a dud.
https://www.vulture.com/2018/12/mary-poppins-returns-review.html