I like the idea begind pa kent, trying to keep his son safe in the last few moments
But the scene just looked really dumb
Martha was just 'oh, okay'
But the scene just looked really dumb
Martha was just 'oh, okay'
Why'd you enter the thread if the subject annoys you? Just to insult people?So let's reiterate for the hundredth time what has been said for already several years. You're more annoying than the scenes itself. let it go.
The part where WB gave the keys to the DC Kingdom to the director of Sucker Punch.
Another few things you night have missed...So let's reiterate for the hundredth time what has been said for already several years. You're more annoying than the scenes itself. let it go.
You just don't see that you're part of a snowball effect. Some people decided and were super vocal. There's nothing outstandingly bad about those scenes. There really isn't compared to media released at its current time. It's just that Zack Snyder and DCEU are the examples. There's plenty examples of bad emotional beats and story telling that are far, far, far worse than this but it's always these scenes. At a point, people have to ask themselves, "Why is it these 2 scenes that some people cannot shut up about?" and the answer is pretty clear. Like, the OP literally has a photo of Zack Snyder in it that is aimed at mocking Zack Snyder.
Y'all literally build these to just joke about it.
Like, think about it. Suicide Squad is literally a 100% objectively worse film than BvS and MoS put together but the amount of hate it gets online pales in comparison.
So it depends on people who care? That seems very arbitrary. Like, for the film viewer world these 2 blockbusters take up a lot of head space.
So many character moments are always flawed. Like, even Thor: the Dark world doesn't get this treatment.
Like, why do you hate this?
it seems super arbitrary or that you don't like the Jesus metaphor even though that's kind of a staple of Superman.
So the level of subtlety is what matters? That seems arbitrary too. Do you prefer the extreme subtle films? Literally some of the best films of 2019 aren't subtle: men can exert control of women's lives without even being seen, and the rich are literally parasites that cause those with less to fight and die for scraps.
So the hate is he isn't the right kind of Jesus? The views on this film vary. Like, we even have DC releasing other forms of Superman were he is even raised in the Soviet Union, so not American Jesus.
I just really cannot see any logical or consistent argument for why these scenes or these movies are this bad. Like, I feel like y'all see it too but it's too meme to really admit it.
So WB marketed a superhero to people who believe in Christianity? I don't see how that conflates into those being bad... Like, the only way is if you have an issue with Jesus and Christianity in general in regards to how it shapes America, but that's not the case with how fiercely people hate these scenes comparatively to other worse scenes.
I am also surprised at the surprise people have for the obvious implications that Superman would be viewed as a God. Like, he literally can lift mountains, has technology beyond our nearest future, can basically reform politics with brute force etc. What is really wrong with actually portraying him as some kind of God like being? You're saying if you're in a really bad storm you'd not hope some individual who can fly around the world in seconds wouldn't swoop up and save you? We literally have religions around people performing feats that have zero evidence. Like, you have video proof the dude can do all this stuff but nope, no one would ever make the comparison to an actual God.
So when you reduce such an important moment to a tornado shows up, which really he could've just farted away if he wanted, it cheapens the whole thing. Which itself plays into the Kents kinda being crappy people too.
I don't have an opinion on those movies, they're the same Hollywood shit American engulf the world with, you can keep it.
I'd not consider "annoying" an insult. I opened up the thread to see what was being told and saw a comment that I was agreeing with and answer to it then someone who disagrees with me answered to me. At no point did I decided to counter someone's opinion.Why'd you enter the thread if the subject annoys you? Just to insult people?
There's also an ignore poster option, you're invited to use it.Another few things you night have missed...
Not everyone has had this discussion before here. It's a big site, users come and go. It's not always the same people.
The people who do repeatedly take part in the discussion usually aren't even that invested. They see the thread pop up, drop their argument, and leave.
This thread has been floated mostly by Subpar's contraian bullshit and obnoxious posturing.
We ALL repeat discussions in life, espexially when it's something that we either really liked or disliked, you're a massive hypocrite here.
There is an ignore button, you can ignore threads very easily if you find them annoying.
Do yourself a favour mate.
oh come onI'd not consider "annoying" an insult. I opened up the thread to see what was being told and saw a comment that I was agreeing with and answer to it then someone who disagrees with me answered to me. At no point did I decided to counter someone's opinion.
I would not...
Honestly, that stupid scene was pretty much worth it for this gif edit alone.
So given that you feel scenes with mom's names are weird, how do you rank this, and be 100% honest and consistent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wagTXcO23eY&ab_channel=131untouchable
It's this. "Martha"???? It's your fucking mom who the fuck would blurt out their actual name? It's so damn contrivedI've mostly forgotten MoS and BvS, but does Clark call his mom by her first name any other time? Or only that time?
There is no need to look at any wrong in any movie. It's not like there's justice to be served by criticizing a movie. It's small talk.
The more people watch a particular movie, the more it would be talked about. That's all there is to it.
STOP,
MY
INVINCIBLE
SON
Don't forget the fucked up scene where Pa Costner tells Clark he should have let the kids in the bus die to keep his secret.
That, and it's fucking Superman. Like I said in another Superman thread, I'm not the biggest fan of Supes, but I admit that I really enjoy the character when he's in the hands of capable writers. Writers that really get him, and understand that Superman is just as much a story of Clark Kent as it is the crazy superpowers he has. If Clark isn't handled well, Superman isn't handled well, and that's where Snyder's take on the character falls flat, and why so many people are upset by his portrayal in Snyder's films.
I will say this, however; the Clark and Superman we get in Snyder's movies makes perfect sense when you look at the Kents. I absolutely buy that Clark would turn out the way he did with those two as his parents. Especially Jonathan. It's surprisingly consistent follow through of characterization. The problem is that, as a result, he just doesn't feel like Superman.
I love DC, and I love Marvel, so what I'm about to say next isn't meant to incite a Marvel vs DC war, but I look at how Steve Rogers is handled in the MCU, and I feel like he's a much better Clark Kent/Superman than what we've gotten from Warner's movies. It shows how you can have a character that is fundamentally a good person, resonate and be relevant to audiences, despite how so much of Captain America could easily fall into "Rah Rah America!" style propaganda. Like, Steve Rogers is a good man, much like Clark Kent. They have a strong moral center, as well as a desire to do right by everyone, not just themselves. Snyder's Clark is constantly coming off as apathetic and disinterested in helping others, though it makes sense considering that his father told him he probably should have let his classmates die on that sinking bus.
You can still tell a Superman story about him wrestling with his purpose, and feeling isolated because of his gifts, and having the world be afraid and uncertain having a god among them, without making him apathetic towards helping humanity, or treating it like a chore. Clark wouldn't hesitate for a moment to help someone in need (which young Clark did when he saved his classmates; only to have Jonathan chastise him for it. like, what kind of lesson is that instilling in his son? Spoiler: a shitty one). If you fuckup the Kents, you fuck up Clark as a result. The three of them are linked that strongly. The "real" Kents instilled such a powerful sense of responsibility in Clark that he would sacrifice his own personal well being to do what's right especially if it meant saving someone's life. You look up altruism in the dictionary, and there's a picture of Clark Kent, Steve Rogers, and Peter Parker giving each other a high five. It's just who they are, deep down to their core.
Snyder and the writers want to ask these deep, philosophical questions about Superman, his purpose, his nature, and whether or not the world needs/wants a Superman, but fails to actually answer that question, whether through Clark himself, or any other character in the film. There's a genuinely compelling concept to play around with in Man of Steel and BvS, but he absolutely bungles the execution. Another scene I loathed is when Clark goes to the pastor to get guidance on what he should do. I felt like it was such a missed opportunity to not have him go to his mother instead. Like, besides Jonathan, Martha is the only other important person in his life, and I feel like he would have 100% gone to her for guidance. Though the advice she does give him is that he doesn't owe anyone anything. Which is, sure, technically true, but that's just not something Martha Kent would say to Clark. Man, how do you fuck up the Kents so badly?
One of the scenes in MoS I actually loved, is the moment between Clark and Martha where a young Clark is overwhelmed and freaking out when his X-Ray vision manifests during his class, and he locks himself in a room. I thought it was a really touching moment where Martha is talking to him from the other side of the door, calming him and comforting her son. I foolishly thought that the rest of the film would have those moments of humanity and compassion. I was wrong.
It's a little corny(pa Kent especially), but yeah, I agree.They're both fine. The hate they get is the weirdest thing ever. It's hard not to think it's a mixture of Snyder/DC hate.
To think Clark could just super speed and run in and out without anyone seeing anything as well! :P
I mean, it's not like if Superman has also super-spee... oh no he has that.Definitely Pa Kent. He should have signaled over to Clark to come save his ass and then tell him fuck off for a while to avoid any suspicion.