are you implying a senator somewhat reflects the ideology of the state he represents?
i'm shocked
are you implying a senator somewhat reflects the ideology of the state he represents?
Right, that's the actual issue. He is a Senator from West Virginia.
are you implying a senator somewhat reflects the ideology of the state he represents?
i'm shocked
What is this? Proving a stereotype? You are doing the exact thing I made fun of in my comment.I'm saying that the man who wants to keep his job is taking money from special interests that don't actually align with his personal beliefs or party interests because *drum roll* he's a scumbag establishment politician.
Their giving his masters a pipeline to get him to go along with this.
Unless you think he's just a big personal believer in Oil and Gas.
What is this? Proving a stereotype? You are doing the exact thing I made fun of in my comment.
Let me be clear. Manchin does not: need money to run his reelection campaign, because Democrats have a shit-ton of money. Machin also is not: basing his votes on who gives him money, because if that were the case, then Democrats would simply give him more money, because, to reiterate, and to say so again, they have a shit-ton of it.
You're missing the most simplistic explanation for Manchin's behavior: mostly a combination of representing West Virginia and his sincerely held beliefs.
It's, I think, often (understandably) hard for people to believe that other's sincerely held beliefs can be honestly different from one's own sincerely held beliefs.Also, bluntly - most political fundraising these days is actually through individual donors, as we've all seen through the emails that go to our spam filters.
The reality is, Joe Manchin could get a lot more money from individual donors, in theory. Amy McGrath got umpteen zillion dollars. So is Mark Kelly and Fetterman right now.
Joe Manchin's views, unfortunately, are closer to the median American than basically anybody on this forum, and is to the left of a majority of West Virginian voters, if not a supermajority. That Child Tax Credit we all loved? A majority of voters didn't want it to be permanent, and the more it was means tested, the more popular it got.
Again, rich people don't give money to people to change their views. They give money to people who already agree with them. Exxon gives money to some Republican car dealer who already thinks climate change isn't real to run ads on gods, guns, and Jesus.
People vastly overestimate corruption and underestimate people having terrible opinions.
It's not hard to think that West Virginians are either insane or propagandized when they're against the child tax credit. West Virginia is the third poorest state in the country. You'd think they'd accept ANYTHING. But, that rugged individualist mindset persists.They they either assume those differences are not sincere (they are corrupted by some other factor), or the other person must just be, at their core, either evil or insane.
Ah. The stereotype keeps proving itself true.It's not hard to think that West Virginians are either insane or propagandized when they're against the child tax credit. West Virginia is the third poorest state in the country. You'd think they'd accept ANYTHING. But, that rugged individualist mindset persists.
There is an or in that statement and I would bet that the television time that Fox News gets in WV is very high. Propagandized is probably extremely accurate.
West Virginia is Bootstrap country and coal both built the towns they lived in and put food on their tables when they were growing up. You don't have to do much to keep people believing what they already believe.Manchin is basically irredeemable, BUT I'll gladly accept it when anyone throws Fox News's shit back at them.
It's not hard to think that West Virginians are either insane or propagandized when they're against the child tax credit. West Virginia is the third poorest state in the country. You'd think they'd accept ANYTHING. But, that rugged individualist mindset persists.
Have things really gotten so bad that Manchin is now sensible?
I've just never seen him push back on Fox like this on something big and divisive
They are rarely this pissed at him, and he is not a guy that wilts at a fight.I've just never seen him push back on Fox like this on something big and divisive
Pretty much.To quote myself
This is one of those times where it works in our favor.
What happened here? Did someone get pictures of his feet or something? Like why the sudden shift of tone?
He was visited by the three ghosts of Christmas one night, that's the only explanation.
No, he has always supported pretty much every element of the bill. That includes the fossil fuel expansion, but it's certainly not the only reason he's voting for it.Manchin is only for this bill cause it increases fossil fuel expansion. Even the Exxon CEO likes the bill
I'm just going to assume he's a pod person.What happened here? Did someone get pictures of his feet or something? Like why the sudden shift of tone?
No, he has always supported pretty much every element of the bill. That includes the fossil fuel expansion, but it's certainly not the only reason he's voting for it.
No, but I also don't believe he would support it without the deficit reduction or the ACA subsidies or some of the climate funding or the carried interest tax or the corporate minimum tax either.Do you believe he would support this bill without fossil fuel expansion? I don't. Sorry.
He's on record as supporting it in theory.
Anyway, I think too many people get their political opinions from social media because it's easier to listen to someone with a strong opinion than really understand how the American political process works. It'd be great if Joe Manchin did things a little differently, but I think he's doing the best he can to get re-elected in a state that's like Trump +50 or whatever. He's probably also serving his self-interests too, but that's literally every politician, including your favorite ones.
Or maybe some on ERA need to admit that they're utterly ignorant and alarmist when it comes to US politics.
90%…..He's gonna go right back to being a human wall after this bill and people are praising him. Sad.
If they're voting on it at all, it's because Manchin has probably been placated w/ severe concessions that don't butt-up against his donor's interests.
Sigh…that's not, in any way, accurate.Thank you. He doesn't vote against them more often because he stops so many things from even making it the floor in the first place.
(That said, this video rules and Sinema better not f--- it up over carried interest)
There is an or in that statement and I would bet that the television time that Fox News gets in WV is very high. Propagandized is probably extremely accurate.
I'll add to the repetition: The alternative to Manchin is a Republican holding that seat.
He votes with Biden 90% of the time!
Does Your Member Of Congress Vote With Or Against Biden?
An updating tally of how often every member of the House and the Senate votes with or against the president.projects.fivethirtyeight.com
I mean yes and as nice as getting this passed will be, we need to remember that he and Sinema both are against things like minimum wage increase, but most importantly ending the filibuster, which would help Dems pass fair election laws. He knows the Republicans have stacked the courts and potentially now have control over the way this country will be going for the next decade or two, nevermind how fascist they have openly become, but he doesn't care.Too many people lack nuance. Manchin isn't even close to perfect, and he's hardly a progressive, but he IS principled and has some integrity, and he fights for what he believes in (most of which aligns with the general Democratic party). Why hate him and call him irredeemable just because he doesn't vote with the Democrats every single time? He's far better than another Republican WV senator would be.