Okay and what would they do for someone drowning right then and there??
One of the officers tells the cop with the body cam to keep an eye on him while he looks for a boat, its near the end of the videoSeriously people.
There's zero indication these cops called in the appropriate help, which is precisely what they should have done.
Oh right, every time I've been near a body of water there's always someone with a 100 ft rope nearby. Almost forgot about that.
No, those laws never require you to put yourself in danger. And realistically given how quickly he drowned there is no scenario in which they could have taken off their uniform and jumped in after him fast enough to save his life unless they immediately recognized that he was going to drown the second he got in the water
Fire dept saves drowning people all the time, ropes and flotation devices.Okay and what would they do for someone drowning right then and there??
No, those laws never require you to put yourself in danger. And realistically given how quickly he drowned there is no scenario in which they could have taken off their uniform and jumped in after him fast enough to save his life
Why should anyone be willing to put their lives in danger because of someone else's stupidity? I'm all for criticizing cops when they do something bad, but this ain't it.People exaggerate how dangerous rescuing drowning people is, yes, there's a risk, but the vast majority of the time you'll be fine.
Receipts? Because a panicked drowning person can totally latch onto you and not let go until they're dead and have already dragged you under.People exaggerate how dangerous rescuing drowning people is, yes, there's a risk, but the vast majority of the time you'll be fine.
No you wont. I was a lifeguard-- you absolutely do not jump in after someone if you have no training. A drowning person will desperately push you under to get out of the water and they are too panicked to remain calm and listen to you.People exaggerate how dangerous rescuing drowning people is, yes, there's a risk, but the vast majority of the time you'll be fine.
Fire dept saves drowning people all the time, ropes and flotation devices.
Fireman would jump in and try because they are actually in shape and brave. Not out of shape thumbs that make up excuses not to save people like cops
You don't see these?Oh right, every time I've been near a body of water there's always someone with a 100 ft rope nearby. Almost forgot about that.
That particular spot is a little further down from the "docks", but it would have taken anyone with a sense of urgency a very short amount of time to retrieve the proper resources. ESPECIALLY at this time of year. Source: I went to ASU for eight years and spent a fuckton of time there.Oh right, every time I've been near a body of water there's always someone with a 100 ft rope nearby. Almost forgot about that.
Nah this is a troll ass postPeople exaggerate how dangerous rescuing drowning people is, yes, there's a risk, but the vast majority of the time you'll be fine.
Transcript in full seems to imply that they called in help (TFD/the fire department), before the officer said that he wasn't jumping in.One of the officers tells the cop with the body cam to keep an eye on him while he looks for a boat, its near the end of the video
‘I’m not jumping in after you:’ Police release transcript of Tempe Town Lake drowning
The bodycam video cuts out and police provided a transcript of what happened next.www.azfamily.com
Has a transcript that the OP may not have (the NYT gated me so i dont know for a fact)
Some of you have watched too many MCU movies. Cops are not Avengers. They are not required to place themselves in danger. Ever. You may think that sucks, but it's how it is.People exaggerate how dangerous rescuing drowning people is, yes, there's a risk, but the vast majority of the time you'll be fine.
Normal civilians do that all the time by just existing alongside cops.Why should anyone be willing to put their lives in danger because of someone else's stupidity?
The headline is great fodder for those with a hate-boner for cops, but this really is a non-story.
Bro, I was a lifeguard for 7 years, only had to make one rescue in my life, of a boy that I outweighed by at least 80lbs, and I nearly died because he swung his arm to try and grab me and ended up nailing me in the eye, and when I went to grab my eye he forced me under as he grabbed by tube, and If I didn't massively outweigh him I don't know if I'd have been able to force him off me and recover.People exaggerate how dangerous rescuing drowning people is, yes, there's a risk, but the vast majority of the time you'll be fine.
No. "Good Samaritan" laws relieve rescuers of liability if they fuck up while attempting to rescue someone -- like damaging someone's ribs during CPR, things like that. Random bystanders like you or me never have a duty to act or save someone.
Nah, you're either a pro lifeguard or this is a troll ass post
You do realise calling in help doesn't make them just spawn in on the scene like a video game? The guy's already drowning, he's dead by the time anyone can drive over regardless.
The risk wasn't so minimal if a grown ass man who seems to swim regularly drowned 50 feet into the water.i mean, it's hardly the amazon river.
If you're a adult who can swim well the risk is relatively minimal, and being a cop should already come with the expectation to be willing to put yourself in harm's way in emergency situations.
It's the bare minimum they could have doneYou do realise calling in help doesn't make them just spawn in on the scene like a video game? The guy's already drowning, he's dead by the time anyone can drive over regardless.
That's irrelevant.You do realise calling in help doesn't make them just spawn in on the scene like a video game? The guy's already drowning, he's dead by the time anyone can drive over regardless.
I lived by a beach in Florida for 10 years of my life and never saw one of these.You don't see these?
You'd think police would carry some around in their trunk.
According to the transcript, they did call the fire department.ACAB, but not jumping in after the guy was the right call, and it doesn't seem like they were ever making fun of the man either.
Could they have handled the situation better, such as calling for assistance as soon as they realized the man was in trouble (or better yet pre-emptively calling for help as soon as the man started threatening to jump in the lake)? Almost certainly. I don't know that anything would've had great odds of changing the outcome unless there was a floatation device available nearby, however.
This is just factually untrue.i mean, it's hardly the amazon river.
If you're a adult who can swim well the risk is relatively minimal, and being a cop should already come with the expectation to be willing to put yourself in harm's way in emergency situations.
This is just complete misinformation and nonsense like this can get people killed.i mean, it's hardly the amazon river.
If you're a adult who can swim well the risk is relatively minimal, and being a cop should already come with the expectation to be willing to put yourself in harm's way in emergency situations.
what? no it's incredibly dangerous, I've known people that almost die when they try to rescue someone 10-20 meters from the shorePeople exaggerate how dangerous rescuing drowning people is, yes, there's a risk, but the vast majority of the time you'll be fine.
It's probably worth threadmarking the whole transcript, which does indicate that they had called to dispatch and asked for the fire department to be dispatched to their location. They call in to dispatch in the middle of the transcript to get verification on their request.That's irrelevant.
Sometimes doing the right thing won't be enough. It's still the right thing though!
Thank you. I didn't see anything in the news reports but haven't duh through the transcript.According to the transcript, they did call the fire department.
Like i said earlier, the main problem is that the body cam cop just becomes apathetic to the dudes cause when hes under the assumption that the other officer is getting help, like "ok well ill just look and keep an eye on you"You do realise calling in help doesn't make them just spawn in on the scene like a video game? The guy's already drowning, he's dead by the time anyone can drive over regardless.
No, it fucking isn't "minimal."i mean, it's hardly the amazon river.
If you're a adult who can swim well the risk is relatively minimal, and being a cop should already come with the expectation to be willing to put yourself in harm's way in emergency situations.
You know that we are on a thread about a guy who drowned pretty fast right?i mean, it's hardly the amazon river.
If you're a adult who can swim well the risk is relatively minimal, and being a cop should already come with the expectation to be willing to put yourself in harm's way in emergency situations.
Those two things were never their job. Their job is to protect property and make the lives of minorities and the poor miserable.
Unfortunately can't find a full transcript but there was one bit with a bit more context. Spoilering because it is graphic:
Officer 1: Go at least go to the pylon and hold on.
Victim: I'm drowning. (inaudible)
Officer 2: Come back over to the pylon.
Victim: I can't. I can't. (inaudible).
Officer 1: Okay, I'm not jumping in after you.
Victim: (inaudible) Please help me. Please, please please.
Officer 2: I don't think they can get (inaudible) the pedestrian bridge.
Victim: I can't touch. Oh God. Please help me. Help me.
Officer 2: Sir, you need to listen to me. Hey, listen to me. Swim to the -
I understand the sentiment, but until we know how the officer went about actually saying it this holds true.
It sounds awful in text, but he was frankly being honest. I think they were probably trying to figure out what to do. I think most people in this situation if they weren't comfortable, confident and equipped to deal with the situation would also say something along the lines of "I can't" instead of saying nothing.
Editing since my post is a little earlier on, but this link has the full transcript:
‘I’m not jumping in after you:’ Police release transcript of Tempe Town Lake drowning
The bodycam video cuts out and police provided a transcript of what happened next.www.azfamily.com
The transcript does imply that the officers before it began, before the officer said he wasn't jumping in had called into dispatch to send in support from the fire department. They follow-up to ask for verification that the fire department is on the way.
Also there's a lot of underestimating of how dangerous massive bodies of water can be, and how difficult it can be to not only get yourself back to safety but also someone who could be your own weight or more added on to try and get them back to shore.
They said that to the man while he was in the water, struggling, to encourage him to swim over to the pylon, because he was going to have to save himself.A lot of people in here bending over backwards defending police that did nothing to genuinely de-escalate the situation and instead told the man that nobody would be helping them after he clearly demonstrated going through a mental health crisis.
There was no urgency, not genuine empathy or sign of caring. Just a nonchalant attitude from people we're expected to thank for "serving the community."
Fuck these cops. Hope they end up broke and alone.