Nah man. I think either the creepy uncle or the one x boyfriend murdered her. I also think the only thing LE planted was the key, maybe the blood and bullet. I think LE were convinced Avery did it and planted evidence to secure a conviction. They believed the ends justified the means.
I don't think LE looked the other way. They had blinders on and didn't even CONSIDER any other suspects. The ex boyfriend had been harassing her recently, deleted voicemails from her phone after she died, and was given unrestricted access to the crime scene during the search. You make it sound like he had to move a ton of shit and it'd be complicated, but he woulda had her vehicle, it's not like he had to move each item one by one. You also gotta remember the Avery property is fucking enormous, it's not just a little business, there are multiple quarrys, houses, etc. on that land. It's a lot of acres. He could have killed her wherever, transported her body in her car, burned her in that quarry and then dumped the ashes in Avery's burn pit. Then he parked the car on Avery's property and bounced. If that is what happened, it was a good fucking idea because the police were convinced Avery did it the second that girl went missing, and it was a perfect opportunity to railroad the dude that was about to bankrupt their department. Avery is a dumb fuck, but he's not so dumb he wouldn't use the fucking car crusher at his own salvage yard to get rid of a vehicle from a girl he murdered.
wasn't it the boyfriend/brother in law that directed "searchers" to the specific spot where the car was found? Acres and acres of land, found the car in 15 minutes. the fact that they didn't even consider any other suspects is suspect as hell. If there's one thing i've learned from watching ID or other crime shows a large chunk of people murdered are murdered by someone they know pretty well.
from the reddit breakdown
someone coming forward and saying they believe he did it, means fuckall unless they were witness to the event.
Bro, It's not my job to know those things, I'm not a detective. I remember a wheelbarrow being mentioned as the possible method to transport the ashes. I also wasn't there so I don't know why you're coming at me like I'm the fucking defense attorney, simmer down you're coming off as super fucking condescending here. There are multiple other theories that are just as plausible as "Steve Avery Killed her in his filthy ass garage and somehow there's no blood in there, while Brendan Dassey killed her in the bedroom at the same time Steve was killing her in the garage and somehow there's no blood in there either."
Not only that, two people are spending their lives in prison and that's the story that they were convicted of.
Well based on the original documentary (which could have omitted stuff in this aspect granted), they basically had every available police officer in the county on the Avery compound for an extended period of time and then immediately arrested him.
I really don't think they did. They even had the ex boyfriend as part of the search crew all over Avery Salvage. And he had those gnarly cuts on his hands, acted really shifty, had been still interested in Theresa romantically, but she did not feel the same, and it seems was beginning a relationship with her roommate, who also happened to be one of her ex boyfriend's best friends. The fact that he admitted to "guessing" her password to access her voicemails, and the phone company records showed that voicemails had been deleted, and the court just said "hey that's a crazy whoopsie daisy!, so anyways" is fucked up.
I'm not following you... I'd imagine most murdered women have also met some innocent people on the day they died.
The specific person who's suing a police department for 36m dollars? Confirmed to be the last person known to have seen the victim alive? Of course almost everyone who's ever been murdered met someone that day, but in that situation?
Not necessarily, the mystery murderer (let's say the ex boyfriend) could have followed her and killed her on Avery's property and the police just filled in the blanks to make it stick.
So it was just a coincidence? The lawsuit could have only been a factor in that scenario if the killer selected a patsy based on it. And logically it would have made him a poor one, as public support and any sign of impropriety would have made pursuing him as a suspect a risky move.
It could have been a coincidence yes. And impropriety? Come on, did you watch the documentary? They specifically requested the local police not be involved due to the conflict of interest yet it was the local police who found EVERY SINGLE piece of important evidence.
Yeah, but how would the killer know they would do that? Logically they wouldn't have been involved at all, and they shouldn't have been. The fact that they were doesn't change that logically, if it was another killer hoping to lay it on Avery, they should have presumed that department wouldn't be involved, so wouldn't be working to ensure Avery gets fingered for it.
Look, I'm not saying my idea is actually what happened. Reality is based on the police interference I don't know what is really true or not so its impossible to tell. He very well could have done it.
Well even that. To my knowledge I've never met anyone that's been murdered. Let alone on a day I met them. Let alone with me being the last person to see them. Let alone it being after I'd been wrongly imprisoned and are suing the police for it.
Well, me neither, as far as I know, but that's anecdotal.
Again, yes, that's another matter indeed... Although he might not actually be the last person to see her.
Well, again, coincidences do happen. I imagine there are lots of cases that couldn't be solved if you simply ruled those out.
What difference does it make why they made the case they did? That's the case they made, and it requires such an obscenely unlikely set of events to transpire that it's ludicrous.
