It always depends on the situation, take Marvel Mafia for example, the game had like 3-4 cleared townies by the end of it. Of course I'm not expecting any scum member to agree to take one for the team, and someone doing it on their own is rude and unsportsmanlike so I won't think about the possibility for now.
That last bit is a fair position. But I still don't like the "I do not have that right now" blurb. As I said before, unless someone has exclusive info, it would be more suspicious than indicative of a proper leader for one to have a "strong conviction" less than an hour after a game commences. There's next to no chance the person who ends up being leader 47 hours from now currently knows exactly who they're voting for without fail.
Yeah I know, which is why I don't understand why you appeared to have such confusion if you know this to almost always be the case.
There are already people who want to be leader. Everyone wanting to be would be a mess of dumb "vote for me" posts. I'd rather have a small pool of candidates to observe instead of a wide array which dilutes any reasoning behind the elected.
I was being charismatic, making a good natured entrance. Gosh.
Well, you kinda responded against rac's idea reminding us that if the leader nailed scum with his vote out of nowhere, then he wouldn't be free of suspicions. That's true, but at the same time scum could just set up a preemptive bus today on another scum mate to avoid this. You bringing that up even so caught my attention.
I have the best endorsements, like you wouldn't believe. The people I've shown these endorsements to have been reduced to tears, keep telling me they've never read anything so beautiful.
I'm kinda skeptical that anyone is that good at reading players off of one day. But I understand your argument.
I like this take more than Flux's early one primarily because Fran's reads more as not being confident in his own abilities whereas Flux initially was arguing that he didn't want the responsibility in general. He's since tried to morph his argument some which I'm indifferent on.
But if you don't like the stance in general why is it the player that is fighting the hardest to not be leader is the one you're viewing as the better of two choices?
Are you saying you want a no lynch?
I somehow don't think that would actually pan out that way.
I- I don't know if you thought this response would make me feel better, but it doesn't.
Hi Blargonaut, it's nice to meet you.
I'm not fighting to not be leader. Vote for me all you want, it's whatever. But I'm saying I'm not gonna be going on any campaigns here.
Semantics, you're defending your stance on preferring to not be leader more than Fran is.
Yeah, I've just been sitting barely making progress on Celeste lol
See, here's someone who thinks of the future were leaving our children. With me it's only gonna be the best post apocalyptic totalitarian dystopia.
He'll speak for himself, but I think he's driving right now and can't post till a bit later.
I feel like bringing it full circle, seems like what the narrative demands, you know?
boy the thread is named after me no one here will escape not quoting this
