I'm not saying that her push on turmoil is the same as it was for Flux. I'm saying that you calling that question "innocent" is strange considering how, later, you said this:
[I'd copied and pasted huge parts of your post and Saw's here but it was a mess, so I just deleted it :P]
Why have you completely dismissed that previous question in your ISO if you didn't think it was "bad"? You're saying that "Only now do we get Saw with a question that seems to be turning on Turmoil", and that she's "piggybacking off of someone else's observation" - but when she did question turmoil by herself, you dismissed it as merely "innocuous". That's my hang-up, because it really makes it seem like you're trying real hard to make Saw look as bad as you possibly can.
Then came the vote, and, I've said this before, I don't think voting before turmoil had answered that question is a big deal because the question by itself could've been enough to change her mind - it was enough to change mine.
But help me figure this out, because the point you bring up about how she was possibly trying to chain-lynch Fandorin out of the turmoil flip is, in fact, interesting and something worth looking into, because I really disagree with how she thinks the link between them condemns Fando.