Again, I think she would like it to be a dig at the joke, but explain how exactly this straight up repeating of the joke makes fun of it or comments on it at all?
In that its attempting to mock the identity (specifically the name) of the person she's trying to dunk on.
Like, Gervais is insecure enough to name search himself to start twitter fights. Mocking him via use of his own name is fertile ground for humor at his expense. The through line here of what she was after is pretty clear.
But her tweet is some grade school level "I know you are but what am I" weak shit. Its so goddamn bad that the only thing that stands out is her parroting the one transphobic joke in an attempt to use it as a step to dunk on Gervais.
An ironic subversion of that bullshit that actually worked would probably be really effective and funny, as at its core it should shred that argument while mocking the target for posting it. This ain't that. Not by a long, long ways.
But being a tweet comic isn't her job, or why she's popular. Not a big deal. Not like she posted a "Why Song of the South is an underappreciated gem in the Disney library" video or something. She made a lame joke, it by virtue of trying to mock a lame transphobe joke gives a bit of air to said lame transphobe joke, and that merits pointing out if she chooses to spend her free time wading into the verbal debate with transphobes.
