Wrong.Months are limited to 12.
Days can go up to 31.
Years are infinite.
America wins.
Yep this right here.For handwriting, I prefer DD/MM/YYYY, but for anything where a computer is involved YYYY/MM/DD is superior.
MM/DD/YYYY is just an abomination.
?? You're sorting alphabetically by file name/folder name."When is your birthday?"
Dec. 25, 2021
MM, DD, YYYY makes the most sense to me.
Even using computers I sort this way.
... how do months change less than days? (If I understood what you mean by "change" correctly)Gotta go with MM/DD/YYYY
As nice as YYYY/MM/DD is, it makes no sense when you're logically thinking about how your brain processes time. DD/MM/YYYY I will take too but the year out front makes no sense since it's the one that changes the most. Month and day sit forever pretty much and never change. The month is the one that changes the least so you would want the one that changes the least in the front, then the two that change the most.
And even then it doesn't reaaaally make sense, because the logic is dumb, it's applying the gramatical rules of a sentence to something that is not a sentence but a date format meant to be understood "universally". Date formats aren't "english". The only way this would make sense is by a completely backwards after the fact justification.It only does in american english, not in any other western language.
You may guess why.
That's not my actual screen, lol.
Who says December One.One thing I notice that I find jarring when I see American news clips is the presenter saying "December one twenty twenty-one", as opposed to in Britain we'd say "December first twenty twenty-one" (order aside).
Is that common or just a quirk with some presenters? I think it was Brian Williams I'm remembering but definitely not the only one I've seen do it.
I can't find the intro where he does it but he's doing a similar thing when talking about thE chart in this clip.Who says December One.
What news clip was this.
Nobody says that.
Yup, this. No confusion, most useful across all circumstance … no competition.YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
Biggest to smallest, it's the only one that makes sense.
Largest to smallest. That said MM/DD/YY just feels more relevant to the average interactions a person might have to me than DD/MM/YY. Like YY/MM/DD has clear advantages in a lot of situations, especially for like computers and cataloging/tracking stuff. But for normal human interactions I feel like MM/DD is the most relevant. You tell me there's a wedding or concert or release of some kind coming up, then the Month that it occurs is the most relevant piece of information as it's them most unique and easiest to grasp/remember and sort relation wise to other events you might be comparing it to and then followed by the actual day of said month which is more specific information and less unique. It's easy to remember so and so's birthday is in March and then work your way to the actual day of the month than other way around. And then Year gets tacked on at the end because it's often the least relevant and so it's an after thought that can be included or just left out entirely most often.
The current month? (Or next month i the 15th of this month already passed)
That's the exact logic you used to discard the year.
And if the person asked you this two years ago, the best answer would have been 2022. If they ask beginning of february, it's the 22nd (or whenever it comes out).
What part of the year is most important is context dependant, which is why you need a standard that makes sense any way. Which the Us date format doesn't.
Yeah, this nails it.Largest to smallest. That said MM/DD/YY just feels more relevant to the average interactions a person might have to me than DD/MM/YY. Like YY/MM/DD has clear advantages in a lot of situations, especially for like computers and cataloging/tracking stuff. But for normal human interactions I feel like MM/DD is the most relevant. You tell me there's a wedding or concert or release of some kind coming up, then the Month that it occurs is the most relevant piece of information as it's them most unique and easiest to grasp/remember and sort relation wise to other events you might be comparing it to and then followed by the actual day of said month which is more specific information and less unique. It's easy to remember so and so's birthday is in March and then work your way to the actual day of the month than other way around. And then Year gets tacked on at the end because it's often the least relevant and so it's an after thought that can be included or just left out entirely most often.
The most important part of a date for a normal person in their day to day life is the MM part.
No, no, it's:YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
Biggest to smallest, it's the only one that makes sense.
No, no, it's:
AM/PM{2}-MM(MONTH){1-12}-HH{1-12}-DD{1-31}-MM(MINUTES){0-60}-SS{0-60}-YYYY{0000-9999}
Doesn't really help out the US crowd either, you certainly don't do minutes/hours/secondsAll the EU folks falling over themselves trying to explain DDMMYYYY as being superior when it all falls apart when you add in hours/minutes/seconds.
Do you give the time as seconds/minutes/hour or minutes/hour?
Because reasons.All the hate for MM/DD/YYYY is surprising.
All my techy devices use this format, my computer uses this format, anytime I get bills or whatever in the mail it uses this format, documents I sign use this format, my doctor's office uses this format, basically it is everywhere.
So maybe it is a USA thing but is seems pretty common so not sure why so many think it is nonsensical or soooo wrong.
I fully accept this answer :)
The other methods are no more valid reallyWhat does the range of value has to do with anything? It's absolutely irrelevant to what that numbe represents.
Maybe that's common in America, but I would say "twenty-sixth of December twenty-twenty-one" for example.MMDDYYYY
you always say the month before the date in conversation anyways