Just wait till the defenders pop in here agreeing with it. But without actually saying it.Legitimately one of the most disgusting paragraphs I've read. What a reprehensible woman.
Just wait till the defenders pop in here agreeing with it. But without actually saying it.Legitimately one of the most disgusting paragraphs I've read. What a reprehensible woman.
Imagine being an MJ and Streisand fan right now. We should be thinking of their loss and grief.Just wait till the defenders pop in here agreeing with it. But without actually saying it.
You're right. That was very selfish and insensitive of me. I apologise.Imagine being an MJ and Streisand fan right now. We should be thinking of their loss and grief.
If you don't mind me asking. What about Wade made him seem untrustworthy.Robson to me seems kind of hard to believe at times. Not saying I think he lied or whatever, but he just seems like a fairly untrustworthy person. Safechuck however... Everything he says sends me back in time and really haunts my soul. It is all so vivid and genuine to me. I legitimately need to take breaks from hearing him because I feel like I am about to fall apart. I really hope he can find peace in life somehow because even if we were to act like this was all made up, he and his family are just such a disaster in every way.
Give it time. They will.Defending "sexual needs" in regard to a pedophile fucking children is easily the lowest point across all MJ threads but I'm glad it didn't come from someone on this forum.
Defending "sexual needs" in regard to a pedophile fucking children is easily the lowest point across all MJ threads but I'm glad it didn't come from someone on this forum.
Of course. Getting help and ruining lives are two very different thingsI could understand someone who have those thoughts seeking out a psychologist to help them, but defending them molesting kids with that argument is wrong. Jackson could of gotten help for his urges, but he decided to use his fame and money to groom little boys and molest them. He deserves to rot for what he did.
They are ?Especially with people on the 'no concrete proof he abused' angle popping off again.
:
Which is odd when you have MJ admitting to sleeping in bed with children and the mountain of evidence of his grooming and abuse. More "hard proof" talk about child rape. Just didn't want the JL song thread up without at least a bump to the victims.I'm speaking more about XXX because there's hard proof of his deeds and he basically admitted to them.
Ahh. Righto.:
Which is odd when you have MJ admitting to sleeping in bed with children and the mountain of evidence of his grooming and abuse. More "hard proof" talk about child rape. Just didn't want the JL song thread up without at least a bump to the victims.
He did it.I haven't watched the doc and I've heard a lot of defenders and accusers arguing and honestly, I am unsure what to think.
Why don't you start there..?I haven't watched the doc and I've heard a lot of defenders and accusers arguing and honestly, I am unsure what to think.
WATCH THE DOCUMENTARY. IT IS COVERED IN IT. CHRIST.I heard that one of the accusers said it didn't happen at his funeral and now he's saying it did
This is covered in the first page. If you actually care then read the posts in the thread, read the replies to your own posts and watch the documentary. It's hard to take this as anything other than a troll.I heard that one of the accusers said it didn't happen at his funeral and now he's saying it did
Would you let your children sleep in his bed?I haven't watched the doc and I've heard a lot of defenders and accusers arguing and honestly, I am unsure what to think.
This is covered in the first page. If you actually care then read the posts in the thread, read the replies to your own posts and watch the documentary. It's hard to take this as anything other than a troll.
Why don't you watch the documentary.Wait, so did debbie rowe really claim they never had sex and his kids aren't his or is it just gossip?
Is it covered in the doc though? I saw it on the sun.uk and didn't see anything of debbie in the doc
41m ago you said you hadn't seen the doc.Is it covered in the doc though? I saw it on the sun.uk and didn't see anything of debbie in the doc
Hey, chill. I am doing outside research first to prepare for myself for seeing the doc as it touches sexual assault, which is a topic that makes me queasy and is not for the faint of heart as this is a subject matter that is hard for me to watch and I need to prepare. Not to mention I'm on a work break now. So no need to for you to be a dick41m ago you said you hadn't seen the doc.
33m ago you were asking random questions still.
You evidently haven't seen the documentary. You obviously don't care to educate yourself. Can you please fuck off?
You literally just claimed to having seen the documentary, I'm not sure how I'm supposed to be taking your constant questions seriously.Hey, chill. I am doing outside research first to prepare for myself for seeing the doc as it touches sexual assault, which is a topic that makes me queasy and is not for the faint of heart as this is a topic that is hard for me to watch and I need to prepare. So no need to for you to be a dick
I never said that and I haven't seen it all. By not seeing anything on debbie on the doc, I meant that i haven't seen news which mention she is in the doc or information which shows she is in it.
I'd recommend just watching the documentary and reading the initial posts in this thread, which covers a lot. As you say it's a sensitive subject. It's a thread that has been trolled and poked at by drive-bys since it first went up, and even in its second life.I never said that and I haven't seen it all. By not seeing anything on debbie on the doc, I meant that i haven't seen news which mention she is in the doc or information which shows she is in it.
They're just asking questions.This thread (and the last one) are on an unending loop lol.
"I havent seen the documentary but didnt one of those two swear in court that MJ didnt do it."
This is as tedious, as it is predictable.I haven't watched the doc and I've heard a lot of defenders and accusers arguing and honestly, I am unsure what to think.
People celebrating a pedo abusing children cuz good tunes. Never fucking changeI was wondering why this thread got bumped out of nowhere. (i didn't know it was the pedo's deathday) And then to see it's the same ol same. Ahh, good times.
They're just asking questions.
I have believed him to be a pedo for a long time (since before he died). I won't listen to his music, but if I were in your position I don't think I'd try to get my sister to stop. When she's older (14-15 or so) then have the conversation and let her make her own choice about it. For now it shouldn't really matter if she listens or not given that she doesn't know about him. He's dead and the damage he inflicted has been done.So I'm gonna stop listening to MJ'S music and I have an issue. My little sister is 12 and has been enjoying MJ'S songs for a few years ad it was even how we bonded when she was little. I'm not comfortable having his music play anymore and I'd rather she not listen to it either. I was wondering, do you think she's old enough for me to tell her about the accusations or can I explain it in "He hurt kids" manner?
So I'm gonna stop listening to MJ'S music and I have an issue. My little sister is 12 and has been enjoying MJ'S songs for a few years ad it was even how we bonded when she was little. I'm not comfortable having his music play anymore and I'd rather she not listen to it either. I was wondering, do you think she's old enough for me to tell her about the accusations or can I explain it in "He hurt kids" manner?
The issue is, my little sister get curious and she'll ask for more specifics and she'll get mad if I refuse to tell her and I worry she might look it up herselfI'd simply explain it as "he used his fame and money to hide that hurt children that looked up to him" and then leave it at that. I don't think you have to go into more detail with a twelve year old.
The issue is, my little sister get curious and she'll ask for more specifics and she'll get mad if I refuse to tell her and I worry she might look it up herself
True, will do that first, thanksThen perhaps you should speak with a parent about this first. It probably should be a parent's call on how and when their child should get educated on complex issues like sexual assault and abuse.
Crow pauses. "I happened to turn on CNN the morning after the first half [of the documentary] aired, and they showed clips of the young man who was on the Jackson tour with us and it made me … I mean, I still feel really … "
Crow grasps for the right weight of words. "It's like a death in the family, you know? It's sad. [James Safechuck] was a great kid and the whole time he was with us – which was the better half of an 18-month tour – I always wondered: 'What in the world are his parents doing?', you know?"
We sit in an uncomfortable gloom. Did she guess? Did she wonder? "Honestly, I think … " She takes a longer pause. "I think that there were a lot of exceptions made because of the damage that [Jackson] … I mean, he didn't intentionally project it, but it was part of his aura – this almost being untouchable and almost alien-like [figure]. And, yeah, I mean, I'm sad, and I'm mad at a lot of people. I feel like there was just a huge network of people that allowed all that to go on. It's just tragic."
I wonder how many artists are having similar feelings of revulsion at working with him.Read this recent Sheryl Crow interview which highlighted a couple of points: