• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tap In

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,034
Gilbert AZ
The thing with Caulkin and Feldman is they both had their own considerable fame and wealth. They both had awful parents as well, but the parents weren't going to be as easily manipulated by gifts/cash, attention, or a taste of an extravagant lifestyle. Also, it'd be much easier to brush aside the accusations of an anonymous average kid, rather than those of a globally famous child actor with a team of handlers. Jackson knew how to pick his targets.

True , Sick shit.

Yes i can see that

... And Those mom's.... Come on man
 

Deleted member 224

Oct 25, 2017
5,629
You clearly made up your mind long before this thread and you're replying to me in an aggressive tone while literally making stuff up.

One of my last posts in the thread was defending the victims when I thought someone implied that because MIchael was rich and had a lot to lose, that makes the accusations less likely. I believe I've also stated that his relationship with kids was inappropriate.
You've repeatedly downplayed the abuse and predatory behavior of Michael. He's a gross, fucked up, evil guy. You call his actions "innapropriate". But it's way, way more than that and you keep ignoring that fact

Edit: and it appears you continue to do so...
 
Last edited:

Mekanos

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 17, 2018
44,088
I haven't seen the doc yet but it sounds like I should. The defenses for him seem less and less in this thread.
 

riotous

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,315
Seattle
You clearly made up your mind long before this thread and you're replying to me in an aggressive tone while literally making stuff up.

One of my last posts in the thread was defending the victims when I thought someone implied that because MIchael was rich and had a lot to lose, that makes the accusations less likely. I believe I've also stated that his relationship with kids was inappropriate.

Have you watched Leaving Neverland?
 

synapsidal

Member
Oct 25, 2017
102
If someone like Culkin came forward, I believe that would change the discussion in an irreversible way.
If he came forward it would be in support of Wade & James, not his own experience. Mac didn't fit MJ's profile.

But idk, I guess 4 hours of illustrating his predatory grooming behavior which can be corroborated across multiple families and fits a psychologically proven pattern of abusers isn't enough.
 

shintoki

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,068
Yeah, this is totally not about his grooming/psychological abuse of children and sleeping in the same bed with them alone, which is reprehensible and indefensible.

These posts are straight up trash. You're fine with what I just posted above? Or you gonna keep ignoring it and redirect to sexual abuse?

Nah, he's completely right. There are two sides to this argument. One side that believes he isn't a pedophile, he just slept with little boys... I can't even get over saying that without laughing at how ridiculous the defense is. Try saying that aloud. He did not sexually molest these kids, just slept with them and not get side eye from everyone in your life.

I'm pretty happy about this thread though. I know a lot of people are down on it because of a few, but I see it as the reverse. A lot of posters here who've I've seen over the years aren't falling for the bullshit and letting it slide.
 
Last edited:

Tap In

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,034
Gilbert AZ
O Winfrey putting this all in perspective for any doubters that want to put themselves in a position to see how and why it took them this long to say this
 

I Don't Like

Member
Dec 11, 2017
14,882
Saw it today and it was hard to listen to the accounts sometimes. Awful stuff. Also incredible to me MJ asked the one guy's mom to leave him with her for a year. Glad she shut that shit down immediately.
 
Oct 27, 2017
3,092
Ok just finished part two


Went in with skeptical benefit of the doubt.

Came out pissed at the horrible acts perpetrated in these innocent kids.


Find it hard to believe Caulkin didn't have it happen too

If you also notice most of them were pushed by Michael away from there fathers maculy is no exception when he started to blame his father for his career
 

rude

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,812
Now that I've seen it, I'm not surprised at the reception to it. I realize that a lot of people weren't going to believe the accusers no matter what, but I think the documentary was kind of...weak? I appreciate that they made the doc really focus on the victims and ramifications of their abuse, but they really should have had more...idk informative/explanatory/illuminating parts? Like maybe mentioning the child pornography-adjacent books he had, or that people have acknowledged the toddler voice he did was an act.

The focus should have been on giving insurmountable information that tipped the scale toward it being believable that Michael more than likely did what he was accused of (the R. Kelley doc did it really well) wth a mix of his victims' stories (since people are already pre-disposed to not believe anything they say).

That's just my two cents. It could've been made to be more effective for the average idiot imo.
 

Tap In

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,034
Gilbert AZ
Watching the Oprah interviews... At times during the doc i had doubts wanting "proof" but.... unless you're a horrible judge of character you can see this is real to these men talking to her
 

Chitown B

Member
Nov 15, 2017
9,584
Not really going to comment on this video as a whole, but it does touch on one good point... the lack of investigative work/research to create a balanced piece. I generally do believe most likelyMJ did these sick things, but this documentary was one sided. I havent seen episode 2 yet, but the creators haven't included any other viewpoints or questione the victims on anything.

I mean its one thing to examine this as a shockpiece, but to examine it as an actual documentary, theres things which could've been better.

As far as I'm aware, this wasn't an investigatory operation. It was to let the boys/men say their experience. If you wanted it to be something it wasn't trying to be, that's on you.
 

riotous

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,315
Seattle
Spike Lee has a famous story about Michael talking to him in a deep voice.

Dude basically LARPED as a little boy half his life.
 

feyder

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,156
Nah, he's completely right. There are two sides to this argument. One side that believes he isn't a pedophile, he just slept with little boys... I can't even get over saying that without laughing at how ridiculous the defense is. Try saying that aloud. He did not sexually molest these kids, just slept with them and not get side eye from everyone in your life.

I'm pretty happy about this thread though. I know a lot of people are down on it because of a few, but I see it as the reverse. A lot of posters here who've I've seen over the years aren't falling for the bullshit and letting it slide.
That's where I was even before the documentary. This guy openly and happily admitted to sleeping with young boys. I guarantee if any man other than Michael Jackson admitted to that, almost everyone would be disgusted, and believe that he's a pedophile. And everyone would believe that he did more than just sleep with them. After this documentary, I'm finding it very hard to believe it wasn't more than just sleeping.

That there are still people defending his behaviour and downplaying him and his acts as merely "inappropriate" is gross.
 

Surfinn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,590
USA
"Inappropriate" is making dirty jokes at work.

Grooming and sleeping in the same bed as children is fucking abuse, so I'd really appreciate if people would stop calling it something less.

But anytime the subject is brought up, the defense force vanishes into the night.
 

kyoya

Member
Dec 26, 2017
117
I honestly believe Jackson's friendship with Macauley Culkin was intended to make him look normal as strange as it sounds. Jackson intentionally didn't abuse Culkin, and other child actors he had befriended so he could use them later on to testify as character witnesses that could help him in a court case. We'd see in part two of the documentary that Culkin would in fact be used by the defense in the second court case, testifying that Jackson had never sexually abused him.

The way this documentary was presented, focusing on both men, their grooming by Jackson, the gifts, threats, promises and the way their families back up the stories (and were also manipulated by Jackson), I believe both men are telling the truth. They have nothing to gain from telling their story and they have put a lot at stake with regards to their own safety and families.

If anyone wants a similar documentary to watch on pedophile behavior in Hollywood, just find "An Open Secret" on YouTube, there are so many similarities in the predatory behavior in both documentaries.

I truly feel sorry for both men and I hope that with time and therapy they can begin to lead normal lives. I also feel sorry for Jackson's three children, they must be going through a lot of mixed emotions about the father they thought they knew.

This whole thing is a study of how society worships individuals who put themselves up on pedestals, portray themselves as God-like or like royalty and can do no harm. Michael Jackson was truly the Pied Piper. All the good that Jackson did through his music and charitable donations is tarnished now. Jackson's wealth and image fooled a ton of people, and the Hollywood machine of music, movies and PepsiCo tolerated and defended his behavior because Jackson was a money-maker for so many people.

It's my hope that Neverland ranch, currently on sale for $30 million, will be bulldozed to the ground.
 

riotous

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,315
Seattle
I honestly believe Jackson's friendship with Macauley Culkin was intended to make him look normal as strange as it sounds. Jackson intentionally didn't abuse Culkin, and other child actors he had befriended so he could use them later on to testify as character witnesses that could help him in a court case. We'd see in part two of the documentary that Culkin would in fact be used by the defense in the second court case, testifying that Jackson had never sexually abused him.

I think the answer is simpler than that; MIcahel had a fixation on kids that wasn't just sexual. Keep in mind that in this documentary they discuss the sheer amount of time he spent hanging out with or talking on the phone with these boys. He got something out of all of it, and I doubt it was all 100% grooming them for something more nefarious. You don't need to spend that much time to accomplish that, the friendships he had were also important to him.

If he did molest some boys, he was also smart enough not to do that to the somewhat less vulnerable ones. And he could have gotten something sexual out of spending time with them, in bed with them, etc. without ever molesting them.

I doubt Micahel ever imagined he'd need to call them as character witnesses; he may have used them to some extent to normalize the idea of him having friendships with chilldren, but beyond that I doubt it was that far thought out.
 

Modi

Member
Oct 29, 2017
763
Is Paris ok? i remember her go to hospital from some comments in Instagram about her father years ago.
 

Deleted member 2533

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,325
It's so insane to see Jackson running around being chased by paparazzi all while surrounding himself with these boys.

Okay, he has a boy dancer for the tour, fine, but it's not like he was going to zoos with his bass player or something. And yeah, if I saw Usher going places and just *one* of his backup dancers was getting out of/into the car with him, we'd all be thinking "Usher is definitely fucking them."

It's so out in the open.
 

seat

Banned
Mar 14, 2018
756
I just watched both parts.

I absolutely believe Safechuck and Robson are telling the truth.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
31,902
Imagine this being your response to the documentary.
He comes off as a fucking con artist. I don't believe a word of it.

These are some slick drone shots though.
Imagine this being your response to the faxes while knowing the context of what was going on.
And no, if I had a close family friend who was basically like an uncle or big brother to my children, I wouldn't care if they sent what essentially amounts to "best wishes" cards to my house. You guys are deliberately viewing this in the most perverse way possible (partly because you've just finished watching a one-sided 2 hour film).
1551679513_264_Bizarre-faxes-and-the-lullaby-that-Michael-Jackson-wrote-for-alleged-rape-victims-Wade-Robson-have-been-revealed.jpg


10540198-6767779-wadegckru.jpg
 
Last edited:

Maolfunction

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,871
Man, just finished watching both parts in one go. What a fucking brutal watch. As someone who's suffered from sexual assault, the testimonies of both Wade and James were very convincing. The feelings and thought processes they had were so familiar, the grooming, the way that it feels good at the time so you're confused about it being harmful. It's exactly what I felt when I went through my own experience and healing from it.

If they're lying for the money, they're unbelievably well researched and rehearsed. To the point I really just can't believe that anyone would do that. These men were suffering mental breakdowns, their families were crumbling, why would these two men add an element as stressful as trying to lie about something so monumental to their lives?

You can see that both of them are loving fathers to their children and it's the birth of their kids that drives them to the point of being brave enough to speak their stories, kids they did not have in 2004 or 1994. It's just so so relatable, every part of their story was exactly on point. Nothing felt fabricated or false about their emotions or how they rationalized their choices. Definitely had tears running down my cheeks for most of the second part. Gonna watch the Oprah segment when I can, but at this point, yeah, they're telling the truth. I got up and trashed my collection of Michael Jackson CDs as soon as it ended. Fuck him.
 

StuBurns

Self Requested Ban
Banned
Nov 12, 2017
7,273
I understand there's some wrinkles in various details and motivations in their stories, but I watched it, and I entirely believe them. I thought it was a really hard to watch, and fascinating in how the birth of their respective children informed how they felt about it. How it 'broke the spell' of indoctrination or however you'd favour describing it. I watched an interview with one of Jackson's brothers on YT and it made me so angry. The idea that because they lied under oath we should take that version of events as true over this version, or that they can't be trusted because of it. I understand that it might be hard to stomach for his family, or his die hard fans, and I can't imagine the weight of having to go through all this over and over, but personally, I entirely believe the two victims in the film, and I wish I believed in a hell to hope Jackson currently resides in it.

The responsibility of parents is tough. I am not a parent, and it's all too easy for me to say who the fuck would allow their child to sleep with a grown man, and you can see that at least one of their mothers is hurt deeply by her actions or inactions, and I can understand the older brother's perspective on his mother fucking up, certainly, but I don't know how I feel about it. Certainly the safe thing is to presume everyone is a potential threat to your children, but I can somewhat understand the lapse in judgement in the context, as damaging as the repercussions were.
 

Lentic

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,835
I don't know how anyone can watch the documentary and walk away unconvinced. The part about the wedding rings especially captured the mixture of emotions involved. The dude's hands were shaking ffs. They sincerely loved MJ at one point in their lives.
There are plenty of clips of his "real" voice as well...


Holy shit! That's creepy af. I don't know how anyone can continue to deny that he was a master manipulator. This is the same guy who said with a straight face that he never got plastic surgery or his skin bleached. It's a perfect example of people willing to believe what they want to believe.
 

Prattle

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
995
User Warned: Low-Effort Drive-By Posting
Like with anything else out there, idol worship is poison. Whether Michael Jackson or anyone else actually did what they're accused of, defending them militantly is never healthy behavior in any sort of context outside of the court of law. It's always good to look at things with a critical eye first and foremost, and even if you come to a personal conclusion that skews in one certain direction, that doesn't mean things are set in stone.

Over the years I've always felt MJ's accusations had nothing behind it, however if there WAS more than what I knew about it that proved otherwise I would never be shocked or disappointed by it aside from the fact that the victims had to deal with this dirtbag. I'll be watching this documentary when it comes out for sure.
JDD1006-2__00507.1390359141.1280.1280.jpg
 

regenhuber

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,201
I watched like 75% of the first episode last night with my wife and we were both devastated. We both don't want to believe it, just like many posters ITT. But the facts kinda speak for themselves.

We were both born in the mid 80s, so we experienced the height of MJ's power. During that time (late 80s to late 90s) he was as big as Spiderman and Justin Bieber combined. Not sure if any superstar will ever be as big as MJ was back then. OTH we were too young to understand the rumours about stuff with little boys. It was super hard to even think of MJ as an actual person.
But hey, he's a perv. fuck him.

Now the question is, how will the world handle MJ and his legacy going forward. Will there be a #muteMJ like #muteRKelly?
I kinda doubt it:

a) R Kelly only had one global hit "believe I can fly", MJ had like 20+ of those. For Spotify, labels etc. it's easy to move forward without R Kelly content & revenue. With MJ tho?

b) there's already enough doubt about these allegations out there. During MJ's lifetime the matter was never settled once and for all, so debates will linger on.

Thing is, I was listening to an "old people radio station" in the car this weekend and they were playing "I believe I can fly".
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
31,902
Now the question is, how will the world handle MJ and his legacy going forward. Will there be a #muteMJ like #muteRKelly?
People have trouble even condemning him for sleeping in the same bed as little boys, let alone everything else.

People in this very thread have excused an adult man calling a seven year old boy he's unrelated to every day for two years, calling said unrelated child 'little one' in abundant faxes sent daily, sleeping in bed with children and debating the meaning of "share" in the context of sharing a bed, having a security system installed so he knows who's coming to his bedroom despite using the bedroom to sleep in bed with young boys. Have victim-blamed with numerous "if it was that bad why did he do x". Have criticized child abuse victims for the length of time they took to come out and for not revealing they had been Michael Jackson's plaything when asked.

Each trying to say how meaningless one grain of sand is while standing on a beach.

I sincerely hope I'm wrong but I can't see there being any overarching rebuke of Michael Jackson and his work.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
31,902
Yup. According to this (based on Forbes):
https://www.infoplease.com/world/health-and-social-statistics/highest-earning-dead-celebrities

MJ generated 115 million $ in earnings just in 2015. That's a pretty big incentive to "fight for his legacy".
Yet to some here it's the victims of child abuse – who were sold the dream of fame, wealth and the lifestyle they were experiencing at the time before being dropped like a brick in favour of the company of younger boys – that are greedy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.