Yeah, but was there any reason to expect that the Knights of Ren would be significant in the first place? Beyond the fact that they were Ren's followers? It just seems like such a random thing to build up excitement over. They're barely mentioned in either film and there's nothing to suggest they're anything more than cronies. What does their inclusion add to the plot thematically? Like, what makes them interesting?
I guess they're getting expanded in this one, so here's hoping they live up to whatever expectations people are building.
These new batch of detractors are really in a hard place though because these films have done well critically.
The prequel haters could look at the critical consensus as proof of their derision. With the new trilogy, they feel very much left out in the cold given the effusive critical praise, especially in regards to TLJ.
We've clearly reached a point where pleasing all SW fans is impossible but there's a subset looking to trash these films in a manner almost pathological.
That said, I'm personally thrilled because I think SW is in the best place it's ever been, especially with the TV show looming and the Clone Wars returning. :)
The redlettermedia generation, as if their opinion is the only "real" one.
Really interesting concepts in this leak, can not wait to see what's in the final official media.
excited to see all the leftover plot threads left from TFA answered finally 2 movies later
Isn't it a bit ironic to go "ugh, these haters think their opinion is the only 'real' one" in reply to a post that literally boils down to "the critics said it's good and I agree so anyone who dislikes the ST is 'pathologically inclined to trash it' and should therefore shut up"?
Did we just get a trailer or did we get a full movie?I can kind of see how that might square the circle of how Kylo could have that philosophy and then still have the helmet because his "letting the past die" = "doomed to repeat his past."
But the TLJ trailer literally putting his quote "let the past die" over footage of him destroying his helmet makes it pretty hard for me to really buy it. They kind of fused those two things together.
Yeah I think that's just trailer editing. That particular trailer was full of misleading shots and voice overs too iirc.I interpreted that whole sequence of Snoke humiliation, and the destruction of the helmet, as a moment of crisis that led him to the "let the past die" philosophy in the first place. That's why he immediately goes to (hesitantly) kill his mother.
But maybe the fusing of "let the past die" and the helmet destruction was a creation of the trailer editors more than a symbolic fact of the movie...?
"Finally! All those plot threads from TFA will at last be answered! Two movies later 🙄"
"Which ones?"
"Knights of Ren and...um..."
Reys parents matter after all :O
I never once interpreted it that way. I don't think the film itself acknowledges that what Luke is doing is down a dark path, and this is not a subtle series. If choking is more of a dark side move than slicing people with a lightsaber (something he also does with abandon on the skiff), then I don't think they thought to include that in the narrative in 1983. The score stirs and we're supposed to cheer for him defeating Jabba's minions. It is not presented as a moral quandary.The first thing we see him doing is choking people to death with a black hood. The entire throne room doesn't work unless he was subsceptible to the darkside.
Snoke and Rey are siblings! Greatest twist of all time!
The last film literally had a character state that the force is used for knowledge of defense instead of outright attacking and the climax of Luke's arc is the most blatantly time he's ever tried to attack somebody. First impressions are one thing, but when the entire context of a film and arc is taken into account things start to make sense.I never once interpreted it that way. I don't think the film itself acknowledges that what Luke is doing is down a dark path, and this is not a subtle series. If choking is more of a dark side move than slicing people with a lightsaber (something he also does with abandon on the skiff), then I don't think they thought to include that in the narrative in 1983. The score stirs and we're supposed to cheer for him defeating Jabba's minions. It is not presented as a moral quandary.
Yea sure.The whole RotJ trajectory of Luke seems to me like he has generally gotten his shit together since the last movie. He seems capable and morally sound (or at least the narrative seems to unsociable so). He seems righteous in his decision to confront Vader and save him. The narrative only shows us that Luke has an inner struggle after Vader finds out about Leia.
Considering some of the more popular characters in the franchise's history. Are you though?
Isn't it a bit ironic to go "ugh, these haters think their opinion is the only 'real' one" in reply to a post that literally boils down to "the critics said it's good and I agree so anyone who dislikes the ST is 'pathologically inclined to trash it' and should therefore shut up"?
They actually appeared on screen and did stuff for the little time they got. This is like getting hyped to see one of those space angels Anakin mentions, who cares??Not the first time SW fans have latched onto minor, one-note characters. Boba Fett and Darth Maul come to mind.
Yeah... well.. they look cool ok?Not the first time SW fans have latched onto minor, one-note characters. Boba Fett and Darth Maul come to mind.
It's been 2-3 days. Not hard to explain.I'm curious how they explain where these knights of Ren were all this time when Kylo needed them the most.
Rey's journey is not the same as Luke's. I think putting her in all black would look cool but I dont think it fits her personality/tendencies established in TFA/TLJ.I dunno. She's always been wearing white highlights. Luke in the first film was wearing white too. I think she should be wearing black now. Her version of Luke's outfit in RotJ. Alas.
For real. Haven't they been mentioned like... literally once, off-handedly in this series? Characterizing them as a "plot thread" is especially lol-worthy.
Weren't the Knights of Ren just the dudes that followed Ren in his betrayal? They've barely been mentioned as far as I remember. Why were people under the impression they were going to be so significant? What did I miss?
To be fair, why even include them in the first trailer? Of course everyone was going talk about it and speculate about it. And then have them be other students of Lukes that joined with Kylo. That has crazy potential and thus far has been squandered.They actually appeared on screen and did stuff for the little time they got. This is like getting hyped to see one of those space angels Anakin mentions, who cares??
Quite literally yes.For real. Haven't they been mentioned like... literally once, off-handedly in this series? Characterizing them as a "plot thread" is especially lol-worthy.
I think you're putting your own feeling into what I actually said. I never said anyone that didn't like it was wrong or they should shut up? You are allowed to dislike whatever you want, I just see a lot of the same rhetoric that groups like RLM say repeated over and over with no real thought put into it.
Hey man that one shot of them in the TFA was rad
The last film literally had a character state that the force is used for knowledge of defense instead of outright attacking and the climax of Luke's arc is the most blatantly time he's ever tried to attack somebody. First impressions are one thing, but when the entire context of a film and arc is taken into account things start to make sense.