It's still not the most likely hypothesis*, it wasn't the most likely hypothesis* 2 months ago, it wasn't 2 weeks ago, and it isn't today, but you can't entirely rule it out. If you trust the science then you trust the science. And for the origins of this corinavirus, the science suggests it was probably natural spillover, but the science also can't rule out other theories/hypotheses, one of which was that this coronavirus could have originated in a lab (and then from there, there's also benevolent and malevolent theories).
Also I don't think it's true that *most* people think this coronavirus escaped from a lab. I also think the media has been pretty responsible with this reporting. For basically all of 2020 and most of 2021 the "lab leak theory" was widely dismissed and not given any air in the media, but after the statement from WHO scientists 2 weeks ago that it can't be ruled out, that got some play in the media and it should. I think the Slate's Political Gabfest panel was accurate, when they rightly described that the lab leak theory was verboten in the establishment media for most of 2020 and 2021, and even after some scientists came out and walked back a definitive dismissal of it, it's still not the predominant theory espoused by the establishment media or held by most informed people.
There's also the point that "the wet market theory" drips in as much racism as "the lab leak theory."
(* originally used "lab leak theory," changed to "hypothesis" and tried to be consistent where I'm calling it a theory vs. hypothesis, vs. quoting others using the word theory... might have some gaffes)