Is that official? I have yet to see a building in Japan without those. My apartment is 20+ years old and it has those in every room. Even crappy office buildings I've been to all had those. Hard to believe they didn't have them.No sprinklers/emergency exit. So incredibly frustrating that this could have been a lot less worse if Kyoto was more vigilant with fire code.
Murdered 33 people because he felt "ripped off", this piece of shit should be hanged on the spot or better yet set him on fire
For safety issues in general, not really. Remember this place gets hit by quakes all the time, plus population density is massive so any fire or destruction is bound to hit A LOT of people in general. It might have been for this building, but I don't think it's a general thing.Japanese building codes are way more lax than western ones I'd guess. Hopefully this is a wake up call.
Excuse me?
I mean dude is pretty much a dead man walking at this point, it's really only a matter of time. That said, it's not like him dying brings anyone backMurdered 33 people because he felt "ripped off", this piece of shit should be hanged on the spot or better yet set him on fire
You suggested these 33 deaths weren't really the fault of the arsonistExcuse me?
Are you seriously saying that the shocking lack of fire safety procedures didn't lead to massive unesscessary loss of life.
They is no way that a single arsonist should of been able to kill 33 people and injure another 36.
The menas to trap people should never have been possible.
WTF? They don't mandate those in Japan?No sprinklers/emergency exit. So incredibly frustrating that this could have been a lot less worse if Kyoto was more vigilant with fire code.
Remember this place gets hit by quakes all the time, plus population density is massive so any fire or destruction is bound to hit A LOT of people in general.
I mean the Arsonist is definitely the most directly at fault and is going to get the death penalty, but that doesn't mean no other negligence occured that made the situation worse and should be punished with regards to the building design. That said it seems the building is pretty old and might have been built under more lax lawsYou suggested these 33 deaths weren't really the fault of the arsonist
That's the worst way to get your message across dude. Only one person in this equation *decided* to kill people.
Sounds like Dimebag's murderer.
Yeah and there's a bloody way to say that without absolving the bloody arsonist.I mean the Arsonist is definitely the most directly at fault and is going to get the death penalty, but that doesn't mean no other negligence occured that made the situation worse and should be punished with regards to the building design. That said it seems the building is pretty old and might have been built under more lax laws
I said that those 33 deaths might of been preventable. Whether the fire was man made or not.You suggested these 33 deaths weren't really the fault of the arsonist
That's the worst way to get your message across dude. Only one person in this equation *decided* to kill people.
And you're saying this while facts are in dispute. With assumptions.
I honestly feel more responsibility lies with the shocking lack of fire safety protocols than the actual arsonist.
I would guess 95% of these lives wouldn't of been lost. Hell maybe nobody would of had to die.
You said you felt the arsonist was less responsible than the safety protocols, despite the fact that the arsonist was 100% the cause of the fire.I said that those 33 deaths might of been preventable. Whether the fire was man made or not.
The whole point of fire safty regulations is to prevent or minimise loss of life in these situations.
Of course the guy is to blame for starting the fire. But he should never of been able to easily kill 33 people!
I'm not going to argue with you. You are twisting what I said.
He was 100% the cause of the fire but NOT 100% of the cause of the 33 people dying.You said you felt the arsonist was less responsible than the safety protocols, despite the fact that the arsonist was 100% the cause of the fire.
I quoted you but okay.I'm not going to argue with you. You are twisting what I said.
Didn't see their original post, yeah that's a pretty bad way to say that. SorryYeah and there's a bloody way to say that without absolving the bloody arsonist.
's cool, yoDidn't see their original post, yeah that's a pretty bad way to say that. Sorry
well if you look around the building. there is no fire escape leader. so if the first floor is burned then very hard to go out. you have to go to upstair but report say that roof access could be locked since many victim found on the stair to the roof
Obviously, Arsonist will be the one the responsible for this accident. but huge death toll could be prevented
Fire escape ladders on the exterior are NOT a thing in Japan nor in many other countries (including many in Europe). They are interior.
Not every country has the same rules, and the interior stairs are also protected so they can't burn.
This. At least in Spain we don't have exterior escape ladders or stairs. Everything is interior. Those interior stairs are sealed off with "fire-proof/resistant?) doors.Fire escape ladders on the exterior are NOT a thing in Japan nor in many other countries (including many in Europe). They are interior.
Not every country has the same rules, and the interior stairs are also protected so they can't burn.
It is one of the safest countries in the world in terms of crime, which is why when something happens it always causes a big stir.This is so fucked up, Japan seems so safe that you never think about something like that happening