• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

dabig2

Member
Oct 29, 2017
5,116
To be fair to Kurz, they did a little bit better on their other climate change vid from this summer:


They at least address some of the issues of disparity there better than here.
 

John Caboose

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,200
Sweden
boiling%2Bfrog.jpg


Only when disaster is already here will humanity do what it takes to make a difference.
 

MoogleWizard

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,692
The wheels are in motion. Anthropogenic climate change cannot be stopped. The earth's systems are all interlinked and extremely complex. You cannot flip a switch and then the change "stops". This whole debate about "stopping climate change" is a fallacy. Climate is always changing, the difference about the current change is that it is happening much faster than what can be reconstructed about past changes, and this extreme acceleration of climate change is what will make it so difficult for the planet's ecosystems - including humans - to adapt to it. This whole stopping debate makes people think it's like a switch and if we implement some measures in the future it will just stop, so we can just delay them, that's not how it works. It's not about stopping change, it's about mitigating it and its effects. As long as capitalism is the global economic system and all countries are obsessed with permanent growth, this cannot be achieved.
 

Neo C.

Member
Nov 9, 2017
3,002
As much as I like Kurzgesagt, this is their biggest blindspot. They are just incapable of pinning the blame on capital.
They are obviously very tech and science focused, that's why most of their videos are into how tech can solve our problems instead of pondering the question of political change.
 

Idde

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,668
For all the people who think 'nothing' is being done: check out the good news network. They regularly have news on initiatives and developments regarding climate change.

Will the stuff they report on be enough? Perhaps (probably) not, but it paints a less grim picture than this thread. And could help relieve some existential dread, which isn't healthy for anyone.
 

Sabot

Saw the truth behind the copied door
Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,946
I ran into this video today.

Absolutely irresponsible to bring up population first, had some real eco-fascism optics.
 

Tophat Jones

Alt Account
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
14,946
That damn 2000 election. Imagine if Gore had been setting us up to deal with this shit 20 years ago?
 

dabig2

Member
Oct 29, 2017
5,116
The wheels are in motion. Anthropogenic climate change cannot be stopped. The earth's systems are all interlinked and extremely complex. You cannot flip a switch and then the change "stops". This whole debate about "stopping climate change" is a fallacy. Climate is always changing, the difference about the current change is that it is happening much faster than what can be reconstructed about past changes, and this extreme acceleration of climate change is what will make it so difficult for the planet's ecosystems - including humans - to adapt to it. This whole stopping debate makes people think it's like a switch and if we implement some measures in the future it will just stop, so we can just delay them, that's not how it works. It's not about stopping change, it's about mitigating it and its effects. As long as capitalism is the global economic system and all countries are obsessed with permanent growth, this cannot be achieved.

Absolutely agreed here.

To put it in context:

Global Warming

Global warming is happening now, and scientists are confident that greenhouse gases are responsible. To understand what this means for humanity, it is necessary to understand what global warming is, how scientists know it's happening, and how they predict future climate.
Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century. When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees. The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster. This rate of change is extremely unusual.
epica_temperature.png

proxy-based_temperature_reconstruction.png


It's the rapid rise that's going to choke us. That rate of change that is going to knock us out of our crib that we've taken for advantage since the dawn of agriculture. We all know the planet itself is just a rotating rock, and life in some fashion will go on, but what a lot of us are worried about is the complete collapse of the biosphere and poisoning of the oceans with overheating. Life for almost all creatures is going to be negatively impacted to the point of extinction for many.

So far our natural sinks (oceans, ice, forests, rocks, etc.) have been doing their job in making sure we're not feeling all of the warming we've already put out, but that's not going to last for long. In our lifetimes we're going to see more of earth's systems buckle and fail. As we see already with this rapid acceleration, they're already taking too much.And humanity as it is now is absolutely not ready for what has been cooking.

To give some props to a clear climate change analog, this line from Chernobyl hits it on the nose a bit:
"Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth. Sooner or later that debt is paid."

And we keep stalling the real transformative societal change needed to give ourselves a fairer chance at coping with our already changed environment.

That damn 2000 election. Imagine if Gore had been setting us up to deal with this shit 20 years ago?

That what-if is always going to sting. At least we would've had a better shot at doing something than the actual less than nothing we got. Grass is literally greener when talking about this potential side, lol.
 
OP
OP
FliX

FliX

Master of the Reality Stone
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
9,875
Metro Detroit
I ran into this video today.

Absolutely irresponsible to bring up population first, had some real eco-fascism optics.
You're not wrong, I had the same though.
Though to be fair at least they have an old video that shows nicely that overall population growth really isn't a problem if we lift countries out of poverty.
 

Voodoowoolf

Member
Oct 31, 2017
631
I usually like Kurzgesagt videos, but this one was bad.


Neither did it explain the systemic issues behind climate change, nor did it convey the severity of the problem, nor did it mention the necessary systemic changes as part of the solutions.


Naming population size first is a big mistake, per capita emissions are so unevenly distributed that half of humanity barely even registers. The problem is literally the richest 1 billion people, the rest doesn't even matter.
Even the emissions 3rd world countries have are in large parts caused by industrial production for western markets. This stuff appears on these poor people's carbon footprint, but it's actually caused by western consumption.

70% of global emissions are caused by 100 corporations. These corporations bribe politicians worldwide in order to be allowed to keep emitting.
The IMF even calculated that 6.5 of the global GDP were used a fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. That's roughly $5 trillion we spend on industries that are destroying the planet. Because powerful people want to protect their profits.
To put this insane number into perspective: If the 2017 fossil fuel subsidies were a country, they would have been the 3rd or 4th largest economy in the world.

Degrowth should have been a bigger point. Redefining prosperity and leaving the notion behind that prosperity equals consumption and owning lots of stuff.

The cause of climate change and the reason why we haven't done anything against it is our economic system, without changing our economic system, we won't find a solution to climate change. We won't be able to innovate our way out of this mess. And we won't avoid climate change.


Literally, if we would want to keep global warming below 1.5°C we would need to reduce our global emission to zero by 2030.
Does anyone think we still have a chance to achieve that? That is a 100% reduction globally within not even 10 years.

We are 30 years too late to avoid climate change. We are currently on course to 4-7°C warming.


Whats missing in this video:
- The role of our economic system (Neoliberal capitalism) in climate change and how it distorts power structures and keeps our democracies from acting rationally

- International relations and climate change mitigation as a game-theoretical problem

- The global south likely becoming uninhabitable because of climate change and how we can deal with billions of refugees over the course of decades without industrially exterminating them

- The 1.5°C and 2°C warming scenarios and what would happen for us to achieve them.

- Degrowth, sustainability, and a focus on GHI (gross happiness index) instead of GDP, how can we redefine what wealth and prosperity mean?

- climate justice
Amazing post that really hammers home how influential the current economic system is in furthering climate change. Things will not change unless we change this system.
 
Last edited:
Dec 4, 2017
3,097
Amazing post that really hammers home how influential the current economic system is in furthering climate change. Things will not change unless we change this system.
The world's corporations have spent dozens of billions of dollars in bribes and lobbying (a.k.a. legalized bribes) over more than two decades in order to prevent production chain environmental standards being adopted as green policy. You occasionally hear of a factory-to-shop environmental standard being briefly discussed, only for it to vanish into nothingness after a few weeks. Remember their backlash against mandatory minimum operational lifespans for consumer products. You probably can't, since that initiative was quashed almost immediately after it was mentioned in the media, around 10 years ago (only thing we got out of it was that minimum two years' warranty for private consumers). Right-to-repair people still try to continue the fight, albeit from a slightly different angle (which is also furiously contested by the corporations).
 

Voodoowoolf

Member
Oct 31, 2017
631
The world's corporations have spent dozens of billions of dollars in bribes and lobbying (a.k.a. legalized bribes) over more than two decades in order to prevent production chain environmental standards being adopted as green policy. You occasionally hear of a factory-to-shop environmental standard being briefly discussed, only for it to vanish into nothingness after a few weeks. Remember their backlash against mandatory minimum operational lifespans for consumer products. You probably can't, since that initiative was quashed almost immediately after it was mentioned in the media, around 10 years ago (only thing we got out of it was that minimum two years' warranty for private consumers). Right-to-repair people still try to continue the fight, albeit from a slightly different angle (which is also furiously contested by the corporations).

Just shows that everything we try to help mitigate climate change is just instantly crushed and suppressed by big corporations and their billions. Stuff like this just makes me super pessimistic as it's like what we can do other than start a revolution? These corporations and lobbying groups aren't just going to change through us protesting and voting in a better candidate, anyone we get is owned by the corporations anyway. It's depressing to know that the biosphere of the earth which took billions of years to evolve and develop is going to be destroyed in the next 50 years or so because of the pursuit of infinite growth and profits. Thanks for the reply, really opens my eyes to how entrenched people are in the system in keeping the status quo.