Climate change won't even be a topic in the debate tonight.
They have already given up.
This was actually the most time Climate Change has gotten at a debate so...
They are obviously very tech and science focused, that's why most of their videos are into how tech can solve our problems instead of pondering the question of political change.As much as I like Kurzgesagt, this is their biggest blindspot. They are just incapable of pinning the blame on capital.
The wheels are in motion. Anthropogenic climate change cannot be stopped. The earth's systems are all interlinked and extremely complex. You cannot flip a switch and then the change "stops". This whole debate about "stopping climate change" is a fallacy. Climate is always changing, the difference about the current change is that it is happening much faster than what can be reconstructed about past changes, and this extreme acceleration of climate change is what will make it so difficult for the planet's ecosystems - including humans - to adapt to it. This whole stopping debate makes people think it's like a switch and if we implement some measures in the future it will just stop, so we can just delay them, that's not how it works. It's not about stopping change, it's about mitigating it and its effects. As long as capitalism is the global economic system and all countries are obsessed with permanent growth, this cannot be achieved.
Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century. When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees. The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster. This rate of change is extremely unusual.
That damn 2000 election. Imagine if Gore had been setting us up to deal with this shit 20 years ago?
You're not wrong, I had the same though.I ran into this video today.
Absolutely irresponsible to bring up population first, had some real eco-fascism optics.
Amazing post that really hammers home how influential the current economic system is in furthering climate change. Things will not change unless we change this system.I usually like Kurzgesagt videos, but this one was bad.
Neither did it explain the systemic issues behind climate change, nor did it convey the severity of the problem, nor did it mention the necessary systemic changes as part of the solutions.
Naming population size first is a big mistake, per capita emissions are so unevenly distributed that half of humanity barely even registers. The problem is literally the richest 1 billion people, the rest doesn't even matter.
Even the emissions 3rd world countries have are in large parts caused by industrial production for western markets. This stuff appears on these poor people's carbon footprint, but it's actually caused by western consumption.
70% of global emissions are caused by 100 corporations. These corporations bribe politicians worldwide in order to be allowed to keep emitting.
The IMF even calculated that 6.5 of the global GDP were used a fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. That's roughly $5 trillion we spend on industries that are destroying the planet. Because powerful people want to protect their profits.
To put this insane number into perspective: If the 2017 fossil fuel subsidies were a country, they would have been the 3rd or 4th largest economy in the world.
Degrowth should have been a bigger point. Redefining prosperity and leaving the notion behind that prosperity equals consumption and owning lots of stuff.
The cause of climate change and the reason why we haven't done anything against it is our economic system, without changing our economic system, we won't find a solution to climate change. We won't be able to innovate our way out of this mess. And we won't avoid climate change.
Literally, if we would want to keep global warming below 1.5°C we would need to reduce our global emission to zero by 2030.
Does anyone think we still have a chance to achieve that? That is a 100% reduction globally within not even 10 years.
We are 30 years too late to avoid climate change. We are currently on course to 4-7°C warming.
Whats missing in this video:
- The role of our economic system (Neoliberal capitalism) in climate change and how it distorts power structures and keeps our democracies from acting rationally
- International relations and climate change mitigation as a game-theoretical problem
- The global south likely becoming uninhabitable because of climate change and how we can deal with billions of refugees over the course of decades without industrially exterminating them
- The 1.5°C and 2°C warming scenarios and what would happen for us to achieve them.
- Degrowth, sustainability, and a focus on GHI (gross happiness index) instead of GDP, how can we redefine what wealth and prosperity mean?
- climate justice
The world's corporations have spent dozens of billions of dollars in bribes and lobbying (a.k.a. legalized bribes) over more than two decades in order to prevent production chain environmental standards being adopted as green policy. You occasionally hear of a factory-to-shop environmental standard being briefly discussed, only for it to vanish into nothingness after a few weeks. Remember their backlash against mandatory minimum operational lifespans for consumer products. You probably can't, since that initiative was quashed almost immediately after it was mentioned in the media, around 10 years ago (only thing we got out of it was that minimum two years' warranty for private consumers). Right-to-repair people still try to continue the fight, albeit from a slightly different angle (which is also furiously contested by the corporations).Amazing post that really hammers home how influential the current economic system is in furthering climate change. Things will not change unless we change this system.
The world's corporations have spent dozens of billions of dollars in bribes and lobbying (a.k.a. legalized bribes) over more than two decades in order to prevent production chain environmental standards being adopted as green policy. You occasionally hear of a factory-to-shop environmental standard being briefly discussed, only for it to vanish into nothingness after a few weeks. Remember their backlash against mandatory minimum operational lifespans for consumer products. You probably can't, since that initiative was quashed almost immediately after it was mentioned in the media, around 10 years ago (only thing we got out of it was that minimum two years' warranty for private consumers). Right-to-repair people still try to continue the fight, albeit from a slightly different angle (which is also furiously contested by the corporations).