One of the best, along with the benny lava stuff.
If she's wrong, you can talk about reactionary journalism.
This defensive reaction many seem to be adopting is premature and disconcerting.
ugh, i miss old nightwishHAMSTER!
A DENTIST!
HARD PORN!
STEVEN SEAGULL!
WARIO, THIS IPOD!
IN ME, THE FISH MASTER!
listenting to the song, it does sound like that. but its also real quiet and they could be saying restart it.
Frankly, I find this information worth getting out sooner rather than later so that people who have a problem with it don't purchase the DLC.How is it bad to be defensive when the original article is equally accusatory and based in the same non-information?
She was told it said that word, mentally processed that word due to the expectation of it, and wrote the article accusing the game of using that word without verification of any sort.
The accusation was premature and disconcerting and its hypocritical to not see that.
Well, she seemed based on the article to check the actual lyrics for the track, which btw. don't have the spoken section at all on it. At least the booklet for the soundtrack doesn't have the spoken section of of Get Up, Wake Up, Get Out There at all. As people can see here:
This is absolutely not how journalism works.Frankly, I find this information worth getting out sooner rather than later so that people who have a problem with it don't purchase the DLC.
She asked for comment, if she's wrong she can retract.
If this is what passed for research in my high school journalism class, I'd have gotten plenty of Fs along with any deserved Ls.
That and... surprised it took somebody that much time to go for that reach, I mean it's the same song as the one from 2017 (1:55):
so what gives? lol
Frankly, I find this information worth getting out sooner rather than later so that people who have a problem with it don't purchase the DLC.
She asked for comment, if she's wrong she can retract.
How does Kotaku has such varying degrees of quality in its articles?
Stuff from Schrier, to LKD shit stirring
Frankly, I find this information worth getting out sooner rather than later so that people who have a problem with it don't purchase the DLC.
She asked for comment, if she's wrong she can retract.
When I read this I was thinking out loud "wait what System of a Down song was this again"HAMSTER!
A DENTIST!
HARD PORN!
STEVEN SEAGULL!
WARIO, THIS IPOD!
IN ME, THE FISH MASTER!
that's not how journalism works, you can't put out anything you want, with barely any research, and then wait for comments after you've done the damage. that's incredibly irresponsible and unprofessional.
Frankly, I find this information worth getting out sooner rather than later so that people who have a problem with it don't purchase the DLC.
She asked for comment, if she's wrong she can retract.
Frankly, I find this information worth getting out sooner rather than later so that people who have a problem with it don't purchase the DLC.
She asked for comment, if she's wrong she can retract.
It could go either way since the consonant there is so soft. It goes back and forth between a G and a D for me.
Frankly, I find this information worth getting out sooner rather than later so that people who have a problem with it don't purchase the DLC.
She asked for comment, if she's wrong she can retract.
I find it's more important to be accurate than have things out sooner, but hey what do I knowFrankly, I find this information worth getting out sooner rather than later so that people who have a problem with it don't purchase the DLC.
She asked for comment, if she's wrong she can retract.
My outrage is stoked in the fact that this is a poorly researched article making an inflammatory definitive accusation that also got published before any clarifications were received.Yeah honestly the weirdest takes in here would be the "Wow, absolute slander from Kotaku" in here since it's not like this is particularly character-defamatory and, honestly, isn't even up there for worst persona 5 moments either
It's gotten into discussing the basics of any form of journalism that even a non-professional knows. That's the whole point.This thread has now devolved into the ethics and process of games journalism.
I love it. You're all *checks notes* professionals.
This feels like that video someone posted a few months ago where if you listened for "cause I'm a big fucking slut" or "cause I'm a paper chaser" you could hear either or.
https://youtu.be/22rNkXpizNc
I can see how someone listening for the word in question could hear it. I feel 90% of the lyrics in any persona song can be easily misheard because the english diction of these Japanese singers is generally pretty terrible. I feel all around LKD made a mistake writing the article early without doing more research or getting comment from nintendo/atlus, kotaku uk made a mistake for publishing the article despite knowing LKD was waiting for more sources to verify it.
It's truly unfortunate since LKD does so much good for games journalism and transgender people but situations like this get boosted for "look how much she messed up" and 95% of the good articles and reporting get completely ignored. Course it's not just a LKD problem it's a gamer problem as a whole. The only time games journalism is discussed on a site like era is when a magnum opus piece comes out like Jason's anthem autopsy, or a mistake happens like this.
How dare you say that. You fucking GamerGate bigot. 😏
no need to be condescending, this is basic stuff everyone knows, no need to be "professional" to know this shit.This thread has now devolved into the ethics and process of games journalism.
I love it. You're all *checks notes* professionals.
It is kind of a weird undercurrent here that even if this is a crappy article, we're sliding back from Persona 5's representation in another game being ableist to just Persona 5 itself being homophobic.Yeah honestly the weirdest takes in here would be the "Wow, absolute slander from Kotaku" in here since it's not like this is particularly character-defamatory and, honestly, isn't even up there for worst persona 5 moments either
She didn't put out "anything," she published this story. If she's wrong, she'll be embarrassed and it will effect her credibility. If she's right (and I believe she is), she acted swiftly to inform potential buyers of what they would be supporting by purchasing the DLC.that's not how journalism works, you can't put out anything you want, with barely any research, and then wait for comments after you've done the damage. that's incredibly irresponsible and unprofessional.
My outrage is stoked in the fact that this is a poorly researched article making an inflammatory definitive accusation that also got published before any clarifications were received.
And that people will use it to further pounce on kotaku and "fake news" and the like.
It's gotten into discussing the basics of any form of journalism that even a non-professional knows. That's the whole point.
"Put the information out there so those who feel strongly can avoid them, if we're wrong we'll just retract the article""Eh, are you sure we can say vaccines cause autism?"
"Yeah we can always redact it"
"Not liking Kotaku is misogynistic" is some fucking galaxy brain shit, dude.