No offense but you didn't even read the article before posting, the author mentions why it took her a while to write about it
Read my other posts
No offense but you didn't even read the article before posting, the author mentions why it took her a while to write about it
Whatever cross-promotion boost they thought they were getting out of this - was it really worth it?
"At a certain point"Probably. At a certain point she was one of the most prominent female athletes. A single tweet from her as more influence than any one forum or gaming website. Several times over.
You gonna show us some examples of people being "wrongly banned" or what?I wish there was a mod that i could actually have a conversation with.. Just looking at some of the post people have been banned for above .. It just seems like resetera members aren't allowed to have differing opinions.
Transphobia is defined as "Dislike of or prejudice against transsexual or transgender people."
Or irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against transgender people
If resetera has its own definition, then that should be readily available in the terms of service (or something)
Some of the bans above are opinions and have not voiced any hate whatsoever.
Person a saying its ok to go 60 mph in a 55 limit area... Person b says no you cant do that.. And .... Person c says fuck person a i hate them stupid speeding fuckers. In this stupid scenario resetera bans person b and c
Just doesn't seem even remotely reasonable
Star talent, maybe? But bad choice, yeah, even NetherRealmStudios and Warner Bros. Games didn't take advantage of that after the reveal, guess the negative opinion worked. Sadly, too late to replace her.
True. I'm personally cool with going back to MKX's VA for Sonya.Destiny has taught us it's never too late to replace bad voice acting
You might not see this for a while, but I think there's a chance you asked this in good faith. So in case you're genuinely interested in learning how and why your perspective could be misguided: the "biological advantage" argument is at best flawed and can tend to be pretty narrow minded and disingenuous.I'm no fan of Rhonda and there is a lot not to like about her but I don't understand how her comments about the physical advantages of trans women over their cis gendered opponents are transphobic. Is this just something that we are not allowed to discuss because it's uncomfortable? Just today there is an article:
https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...regory-smashes-womens-world-records/23720231/
about a trans woman dominating a weightlifting competition breaking 4 world records in the process. There are competitors that feel like they don't have the ability to compete with her and are considering dropping out of competition because of this trans woman's unfair advantage (she competed in male competitions for 9 years before her transition). I strongly believe in LGBTQ rights and I am anti discrimination of anyone but it definitely looks like bulking up as biological male for a decade has given her a serious unfair advantage. Am I transphobic for thinking this way?
So yes, for Fallon to go through all that, and have Rousey still say she has an "advantage", is pretty transphobic of Rousey. The extent to which it downplays what these athletes have to go through to even be allowed to compete is downright harmful. And since Rousey does this for a living, even assuming that she's unaware of official MMA procedure in regards to transgender athletes means she's being inexcusably ignorant about the whole thing. It's more likely that she's maliciously trying to discredit her competitor in an awful way. Either way it's pretty gross.Eric Vilain, the director of the Institute For Society And Genetics at UCLA, worked with the Association of Boxing Commissions when they wrote their policy on transgender athletes. He stated in Time magazine that "Male to female transsexuals have significantly less muscle strength and bone density, and higher fat mass, than males"and said that, to be licensed, transgender female fighters must undergo complete "surgical anatomical changes ..., including external genitalia and gonadectomy and subsequently a minimum of two years of hormone replacement therapy, administered by a board certified specialist. In general concurrence with peer-reviewed scientific literature, he states this to be "the current understanding of the minimum amount of time necessary to obviate male hormone gender related advantages in sports competition". Vilain reviewed Fox's medical records and said she has "clearly fulfilled all conditions." When asked if Fox could, nonetheless, be stronger than her competitors, Vilain replied that it was possible, but noted that "sports is made up of competitors who, by definition, have advantages for all kinds of genetics reasons".
You might not see this for a while, but I think there's a chance you asked this in good faith. So in case you're genuinely interested in learning how and why your perspective could be misguided: the "biological advantage" argument is at best flawed and can tend to be pretty narrow minded and disingenuous.
Any significant physical advantage that Fallon Fox might have hypothetically had, has been made null and void from her undergoing transitional surgery and multiple years of hormone replacement therapy. Here's an excerpt from her Wikipedia article:
So yes, for Fallon to go through all that, and have Rousey still say she has an "advantage", is pretty transphobic of Rousey. The extent to which it downplays what these athletes have to go through to even be allowed to compete is downright harmful. And since Rousey does this for a living, even assuming that she's unaware of official MMA procedure in regards to transgender athletes means she's being inexcusably ignorant about the whole thing. It's more likely that she's maliciously trying to discredit her competitor in an awful way. Either way it's pretty gross.
Huge props for this answer and explanation. It's almost like the people who are no longer with us would have learned from posts like this rather than getting banned because of opinions based on faulty/limited information...
... I'm getting the hammer aren't I?
most people don't care, straight up. I'm not disagreeing with people here but these types of forums are echo chambers. she has almost 4 million followers on twitter. That's INSANE."At a certain point"
Now, she's known as a Sandy Hook truther and a transphobic asshole. And a terrible actress.
Okay. All the more reason for articles like this to call her out for the shitbag she is.most people don't care, straight up. I'm not disagreeing with people here but these types of forums are echo chambers. she has almost 4 million followers on twitter. That's INSANE.
Ignorance is not an excuse. These people could have learned at any point prior to posting but decided their half-ass opinion was more important. It's not everybody else's job to educate willfully obtuse opinions every single time.
Can we just Nolan North this and have her re-recorded with Tricia Helfer?
They literally paid this woman to make the game worse on multiple levels. She literally brings nothing but a bad performance and baggage from having shit viewpoints to the game.
This, she brings nothing positive to the game. Wasting all that money for terrible performance and bad PR. Brilliant job NetherRealms.
At its core, the major appeal of the game is built around "look at that violence!!!!" What positive aspect does that bring to the game? I doubt the people who buy it would be put off by this at all and I'd expect the name recognition would have actually helped.
Which is messed up in multiple ways, but what exactly do you think MK as a series is? It is the same reason AJ Styles can be on the cover of a wrestling game.
I'm using "positive" here in the context of a plus to the game, not in the context of unicorns and rainbows. Maybe I should've said she adds nothing of value to the game other than a bad performance and bad PR, would be a better choice of words.
I'm not a fan of NRS MTX, but would gladly pay for DLC to patch Ronda's voice out of the game entirely so I could actually enjoy using Sonya Blade as more than an AI farmer.
Has Ed Boon spoken on this at all?She's a terrible person
She's a terrible VA
Literally nobody asked for this or is happy with this.
Even NRS and WB (AFAIK) stopped using her as a marketing point after the reveal.
It gave the game negative PR.
What was the point of this, again?
I don't even know how Ronda is still relevant.
She should have been laughed out of relevance when she got her ass absolutely handed to her twice in MMA.