Okay, and what specs was Alien Isolation developed with in mind?
What improvements does not having a disc drive get us? They can leave it in and still sell it at the same price, that's how very little impact it has on bom.
Outer Worlds was patched appropriately and using this as an example is as bad as it can be to make assumptions of what could or would be. You could have a point if this was a mass phenomenon but it is not.
Thank you for the feedback.
Except the XB1 had the same amount of RAM, the exact same CPU (slightly overclocked) and the same type of storage, so no, it's not the same thing. Also releasing a console and a lower specced version of that console at the same time is not the same thing as one company releasing a console and the competition releasing a slightly less powerful console.
Actually, I'm torn on the disc drive myself. I guess it wouldn't matter to me but I can see people caring for it.
Think you're getting a bit carried away. What's funny about my question? Also forgive me but I don't know how either version of that game differs.
So developers being equally concerned isn't a problem then?
Thats what some are pushing, not where we are, as the sales on the other hand show. MS is again falling against the same stone as with XB1 and the only digital thing.
The thing is there has not been a game with the type of gpu resource split you are talking about. Regardless of what other gpu task you are talking about the jump from 1080p to 1440p would still take considerable gpu resources , those pixels are still being rendered.
I mean on PS4 launch the game Resogun, used GPU compute. How Resogun uses the PS4's architecture to create 'chaos'
Not really. As alot of people think its less powerfull then the X.
If it's only targeting 1080p then that won't be much of an issue. Depending on the price, I'd definitely consider getting one as a second console.
Graphics are scaleable nobody is forced to decrease the gfx fidelity of the Anaconda version.
To my best knowledge, the biggest reason for tanking performance on PC is resolution which in turn means if you lower resolution, that's the easiest way to get performance back on the GPU. I don't know why everything has to be painted in the darkest color, it's disgusting.
Why would they do something silly like that? Do devs on PC not try to get their games on as many PC's as possible?
Sounds normal honestly, it's just offering different graphical settings. Something theyalresdy do on PC
Can't ignore something that will end up getting positive press. It will be the new gamepass machine.
wut? they'll still have a console equal in power to ps5 based on reports.
Jesus christ man, this is 100% awful console warring. Also this is a 2nd sku with less gpu for lower resolutions but similar cpu/ram/ssd so not "shitty"
Do you know if Sony is going to pull anything like this next gen or will they only have 1 system?
And what happens if Sony mandates 1440p 30fps?. where do this take the same games with Lockhart at 1080p 60fps or Anaconda at 4K 60 fps. Both of them would be 4 times less powerful to render the same game!.
Developers now have access to tools that allow them to develop for the top tier box and with a push of a button on the Dev kit scale it down to work with all other versions of Xbox, but Im sure most of you know this by now.
I'm laughing cuz ur serious when I clearly put a "/s"...and if you don't know you don't know.
Because they'll have to run on the Lockhart as well. You can't push the high-end versions, otherwise they'd be nearly impossible to port over. You think having 3 times the GPU power will only amount to resolution differences? Fuck no.
Initially I didn't care for lockheart, but if they can achieve $299 while keeping the disc drive. It becomes hard to ignore for me. At minimum I trade my one x.
