Oh, I think she's a jerk. Full agreement. Just tired of the media getting played by this family and giving them constant attention. They're pure grifters.Are the people upset with it the managers of the dress? Did the public get a say in where the dress is stored or who owns it? Why such hostility over culture you obviously don't understand.
Of course Ripley sucks here. This is a problem with art being a game for rich folks where cultural artifacts are held onto and exploited by private owners. It's just weird to be like "Kim bears no blame" or people jumping in to defend Kim, who is a piece of shit.
This sounded better in your headRarely do you see someone agree with ISIS that it's OK to destroy history that you don't particularly care about. Bold stance.
Because he clearly doesn't give a shit about it.Why Fuck him? It didn't need to be auctioned if it was that important an item. I'd probably do the same thing if I had the disposable income.
I said it out loud to myself too! Trust me when I say it sounded very funny in spoken word.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Kardashians.
And you'd been making puppy dog eyes at it in the window for years?
talk about stupidity on their part.I take it they have insurance on it, they paid almost 5 million for that piece of tat and let someone waltz around in it.
There are many differences between video games and that dress, including the fact that that dress is famous because of celebrity worship and so it's fitting (lol) that it gets destroyed by celebrity worship.The "who cares it's just a dress" takes in this thread are pretty funny considering the threads we've had on this forum about video game preservation.
There are many differences between video games and that dress, including the fact that that dress is famous because of celebrity worship and so it's fitting (lol) that it gets destroyed by celebrity worship.
Should all unique/novel things necessarily be preserved?Another difference being there was only ever one of this dress made.
There are many differences between video games and that dress, including the fact that that dress is famous because of celebrity worship and so it's fitting (lol) that it gets destroyed by celebrity worship.
It should literally be taken off the people who allowed this to happen, and donated to an actual museum. Disgraceful way to treat one of our collective cultural artefacts.
I feel like the OP is burying the lede on some of the weirder parts of this that the article gets into.
but also... it's kinda weird as hell to care so much about the dress to begin with
I think you have to draw the line somewhere, the state seizing celebrity related objects seems over the line to me. She didn't wear it at the signing of a treaty or something, so you just have to rely on owners seeing the worth in what they own.
All of this…..like what the fuck? The idolization of a fucking a dress is SUPER weird by everyone.
How it is idolization lol.All of this…..like what the fuck? The idolization of a fucking a dress is SUPER weird by everyone.
Another difference is that one is part of an historic and iconic moment that has been redone in media dozens of times and Happy Birthday Mister President is known by multiple generations...and the other one is a video game.There are many differences between video games and that dress, including the fact that that dress is famous because of celebrity worship and so it's fitting (lol) that it gets destroyed by celebrity worship.
All of this…..like what the fuck? The idolization of a fucking a dress is SUPER weird by everyone.
I actually don't have any sympathy for people wilfully aiding in the damage/destruction of our shared collective cultural history. If you can't be proper custodians of it, then you don't deserve to keep it.
Not really. No President was involved in that. Context matters.In 50 years some rich trillionaire is going to stretch out Miley Cyrus's thong from the Wrecking Ball video, and a bunch of people who haven't been born yet are going to be pissed.
There are many differences between video games and that dress, including the fact that that dress is famous because of celebrity worship and so it's fitting (lol) that it gets destroyed by celebrity worship.
All of this…..like what the fuck? The idolization of a fucking a dress is SUPER weird by everyone.
You know who else knows what her body is like? Kim. Unless she has the exact same measurements she should not have worn it.no use in blaming kim, they know what her body looks like. they know what the dress looks like. they loaned it out to her and did what they could to force her body into it. clearly it wasnt that important if they were fine with ruining it.
this is a lesson we expect young children to learn. if something is valuable to you then you take proper care of it and keep it from harm
HahaYeah, who cares if it's a significant pop culture artifact? Museums are fascist propaganda and I fell for it.
Yep, you can actually hear the crystals falling off when they were trying to squeeze her into the dress in the clip I posted earlier.It should literally be taken off the people who allowed this to happen, and donated to an actual museum. Disgraceful way to treat one of our collective cultural artefacts.
Tbh, I don't think this is Kim K's fault at all. This is the fault of a private entity holding a historical artifact.
This is no different from Jeff Bezos buying the original movie prop of the Enterprise and putting into Blue Origin's cafeteria.
You know some idiot is going to spill coffee on it someday.
Tbh, I don't think this is Kim K's fault at all. This is the fault of a private entity holding a historical artifact.
This is no different from Jeff Bezos buying the original movie prop of the Enterprise and putting into Blue Origin's cafeteria.
You know some idiot is going to spill coffee on it someday.