Tony's funeral reminded me of the half a dozen tedious endings at the end of Lord of the Rings 3.
Dude... I don't think you saw the movie honestly.
Yondu's funeral in GOTG Vol 2 had more people and far more bombastic.
Tony's funeral reminded me of the half a dozen tedious endings at the end of Lord of the Rings 3.
Dude... I don't think you saw the movie honestly.
Yondu's funeral in GOTG Vol 2 had more people and far more bombastic.
I mean you haven't even tried to honestly argue with anyone.
If your going to continue to post hot takes you could actually try to explain why you feel that way. Otherwise your trolling.
All I've done is give my opinions on the scene. Not my fault they aren't the correct opinion and you feel the need to 'argue' about it. Is "DER YOU PROBABLY DIDN'T EVEN SEE IT" supposed to be some kind of reasonable criticism?
i didn't like tony's funeral. it just had weird cameos and threw everything at it. you only needed a handful of people there. im3 kid was just weird. also, nat never got a funeral. it's funny how overlooked her death was.
Wow so even Kevin Feige, the creative head of the MCU, felt that the movies lacked "steaks."
All I've done is give my opinions on the scene. Not my fault they aren't the correct opinions and you feel the need to 'argue' about it. Is "DER YOU PROBABLY DIDN'T EVEN SEE IT" supposed to be some kind of reasonable criticism?
i didn't like tony's funeral. it just had weird cameos and threw everything at it. you only needed a handful of people there. im3 kid was just weird. also, nat never got a funeral. it's funny how overlooked her death was.
i didn't like tony's funeral. it just had weird cameos and threw everything at it. you only needed a handful of people there. im3 kid was just weird. also, nat never got a funeral. it's funny how overlooked her death was.
All I've done is give my opinions on the scene. Not my fault they aren't the correct opinions and you feel the need to 'argue' about it. Is "DER YOU PROBABLY DIDN'T EVEN SEE IT" supposed to be some kind of reasonable criticism?
if we can reasonably infer from your posts that you might have not seen the movie then.........yes?
Why the hell would they underplay the funeral of the man who sacrificed his life to save the entire UNIVERSE.
They'd best give Knowhere a makeover so it's a giant floating Tony head, in remembrance for what he did.
I liked Tony's funeral scene but it just made me think Black Widow got ripped off.
I would like to sincerely apologize to you for disliking a single scene in Avengers: Endgame.
lol, your reading comprehension seems to be on par with your movie going comprehension
That specific part of the movie felt like it was backseat directed by RDJ.
I'm obsessed with Hawkeye's superhair bending reality 19 seconds in
Also, yeah, good god that scene is terrible
The fact that Feige needed to answer that really bums me out. Can people not put these things together for themselves? Can they not realise how unimportant to the story that kind of detail is? Did anyone really sit in the theatre and think "Oh no, they brought everyone back, WHAT ABOUT EVERYONE ON PLANES, OR IN TRAINS, OR IN CARS THAT AREN'T THERE ANY MORE???".
Yeah, Logan's was done much better. The entire movie sets up his death while Tony's is more he dies and you get sad cause of his legacy. Logan is an emotional rollercoaster of a film so it will naturally have a better death. I still don't get why they added the IM3 kid to Tony's funeral. Seems really weird.Yeah, it's like they couldn't come up with a single tasteful moment like Logan's cross falling over so it ended up being just a blizzard of cameos, where it is just scrubbing the camera by a shitload of people, and forced moments like the raft and TONY LIKE HAMBURGER. Shit was interminable.
Really gotta give Cumberbatch props for being able to sell the cold realist part of his personality while also showing some remorse and regret like anyone else would.I wish they kept the shot of Strange.
He steered the timeline to this point. And while it was the only way to save the universe it still cost a life.
Cumberbatch's face seems to perfectly encapsulate the emotions of him feeling the consequences of what he did.
And while it saved the universe it doesn't make it any easier.
I wish they kept the shot of Strange.
He steered the timeline to this point. And while it was the only way to save the universe it still cost a life.
Cumberbatch's face seems to perfectly encapsulate the emotions of him feeling the consequences of what he did.
And while it saved the universe it doesn't make it any easier.
Logan could have been so much better without the clone drama. I really don't know what they were thinking
Speaking of Logan, Xavier's death in that movie just didn't work for me at all. It's not really Mangold's fault but the fact that the franchise had killed him off once before really took the oomph out of that scene imo. Also, it might have been just my theater, but the audio mix in that scene was really bad, I could not make out what Logan was saying to him at all.
right, but it was still a depiction of Xavier dying. It was something that had been shown already. When Xavier dies in Logan, honestly my reaction to that moment was, I've already seen this before.Xavier technically never died in X3. After credit showed him still alive.
One of the problems with X3 is not commiting to it's choices (like the cure actually not being permanent).
Except Far From Home shit on that....
Oh I agree, but what's in the movies is more canon that what a producer says happened in their head.for the sake of a silly and fun gag. i wouldn't read too much into it.
Oh I agree, but what's in the movies is more canon that what a producer says happened in their head.
Wow so even Kevin Feige, the creative head of the MCU, felt that the movies lacked "steaks."
That specific part of the movie felt like it was backseat directed by RDJ.
Plus it was more of a means to show every major character together at once.
So? If it weren't for that guy there wouldn't even be an MCU. Marvel risked everything on that Iron Man movie. If that means Tony Stark gets a badass death and a funeral, then so be it.
Back at what? In the interview Feige specifically mentions that Nick Fury's "death" lacked consequences and stakes. He cites past movies within MCU not delivering on the kind of finality Logan had and he felt that was something that needed to change with IW. What exactly is your problem with what I said?
That still doesn't explain the countless people who died as a consequence of other people being snapped. Like if someone's pilot was dusted, that person's dead dead and ain't ever coming back from The Blip.
A ton of people all over the universe probably died as a direct result of the snap, but that's kind of the point with disasters.
Actually, I wouldn't mind seeing a non-superhero movie just about the effects of the snap.
COMPLETELY WRONG, you MORON! How dare you insinuate such liesWow so even Kevin Feige, the creative head of the MCU, felt that the movies lacked "steaks."
Tony's funeral lasted like 2 minutes, what the fuck are people in this thread talking about.
Plus it was more of a means to show every major character together at once.