• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

PRrambo_

PlayStation.jif
Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,855
Then we both agree his stuff aint art.

Though neither are they entertaining IMO

So I'll continue not playing them, egdelord.
 

zoukka

Game Developer
Verified
Oct 28, 2017
2,361
One can operate inside an art form and have various motives such as creating art, doing business or wanting to entertain people. Kamiya likes to provocate people with exacerbated opinions.

Then we both agree his stuff aint art.

Though neither are they entertaining IMO

So I'll continue not playing them, egdelord.

Oh the irony.
 

dlauv

Prophet of Truth - One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,513
I kind of agree. There's a lot of art in games, but games aren't really art. They're games, and I'm always skeptical to consider the gameplay part "art." As Kojima says, games are like "a museum."

Ironically, one instance that I would consider gameplay artistic in some way is in MGS4, where the podcast is a meta "hints and tips" guide and also helps Snake relax. There are several statements in that.

Or maybe Spec Ops, where the gameplay is the narrative.
 

House_Of_Lightning

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
5,048
Is it the way that it is consumed?

Art isn't consumed.

Take my comparison above as an example.

A proper "chef" who is putting work, imaginative effort, etc into producing "haute cuisine" versus me cracking open a box of Kraft Dinner.

They both involve combining ingredients, preparing along a specific set way for a specific result. Putting that result on a plate and eating it.

I am not a chef nor is Kraft Dinner "haute cuisine" even though they are 99% "the same" in broad context. That said, someone could take a box of Kraft Dinner and do something amazing with it and actually for real "elevate" it to "haute cuisine".

Words like "chef" and "art" and etc have specific meaning and simply blanket generalizations diminish from the meaning of "art".
 

Deleted member 274

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,564
Lol at everyone calling Kamiya names, wonder how you'd deal with the toxicity of twitter with that many entitled assholes/trolls expecting shit from you.
 

Buckle

Member
Oct 27, 2017
41,049
I don't know why he's saying this, the dialog in his games are the stuff of poets:

 

vestan

#REFANTAZIO SWEEP
Member
Dec 28, 2017
24,612
K6Df2zS.png


This man is your friend
 

Deleted member 5159

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,704
people care too much about different opinions and dogmatic thinking. who cares about what he thinks is art or not and why does "art" needs to be treated as a holy word? art is everywhere really, almost everything that is produced by human hand has somekind of artistic intent in it, directly or not.

videogames primary intent is to entertain but they do have a lot of artistic input in them, if they are art or not depends on your own vision of it. I tend to think of games like ico and sotc more like interactive art than videogames in the traditional sense, so i think that some "games" value the experience and atmosphere way more than the ludic rush to win and make highscores but to each their own. i dont have a problem with someone saying pac man is art or that ico is a videogame. we're talking about a medium with extreme crossover from other fields, like design, cinema, photography and so on
 

lowlifelenny

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,408
Games are art. Everything creative is art.

I can see why he'd want to label himself as an entertainer over being an artist though. I most appreciate games that strive to entertain above all else. Of all the art forms out there, entertainment is the single most important aspect of games in my opinion.

TW101 is way better than Viewtiful Joe.

Definitely. I'd even say it's his best game since RE2.
 

evilmonkey

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,481
Canada
Game don't have to be entertaining, just like other art mediums don't have to be inherently entertaining.


The issue is that the people who make video games, at least the majority of them, want the medium to be taken seriously, they take their craft seriously, but a large part of the audience (partly due to the fact that games were absolutely juvenile for an extended period of time), don't want the medium to be taken seriously for reasons I can not comprehend.
They definitely do, and I honestly don't see how anyone can disagree with this unless they've outgrown their hobby.

The people that don't take games seriously as a medium (i.e., art snobs and film critics) decided a very long time ago that games weren't art, so aiming to have games make people "feel something" has been a lost battle from the get go.
 
Oct 25, 2017
9,091
Part of his point seems to be that calling games art is motivated by a desire for legitimacy and he believes entertainment is a similarly legitimate goal. I think that aspect of his opinion is fine.

He's wrong, as many have pointed out, that the two need to be separated, but I can see why he might be annoyed that people care so much about the label "art" in the first place.
 

Hero

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,747
Yeah, the reactions to his opinion are pathetic.

Video games are a unique form of entertainment and can have high artistic components, and some of them are even crafted to make people feel certain things, but I wish we would stop labeling them as art.
 

HStallion

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
62,262
Kamiya is trying more than a little too hard these days. I get its annoying to deal with the random fans and gamers on the internet in terms of expecting nuance or patience but this stuff comes off as reddit tier philosophizing. I'm surprised he didn't super impose the troll face in that comic.
 

Arthoneceron

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,024
Minas Gerais, Brazil
I personally never thought that games were art.

I mean, art only has meaning when it causes a reaction that you wasn't expecting from it, and I personally play games to have fun, without expecting a deep meaning from it.

And yes, I think that there are games where there's a really deep artistic effort on it, like most the cinematic games from Sony.

But I think that when you have a screenplay which supplants the core of gameplay, that game would work on most of the medias. The gameplay from it is a detail.
I mean, if we remove the gaming parts, the game would continue to work, while if we remove the narratives over it, the game doesn't work at all.

Looking over the most technical aspect, when I was growing, I thought that the nearest that a game was an art for me was the old neo-geo days and how the pixel art on them were beautiful. It's sad that the pixel art these days turned itself into more dynamic style. I mean, it's not bad, but I miss the overly-detailed backgrounds from the old fighting games.

TQqR2Zi.gif
 

Zomba13

#1 Waluigi Fan! Current Status: Crying
Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,919
I just find it a bit confusing considering he said this not that long ago:

"My feeling is that games themselves... they're not just mass-produced things. They're art, they're part of the developer's personality. It's not like you just have the parts and a blueprint, then you assemble them like a car. I don't want games to be that way. I want games to be about each person's individuality, [so] players can feel the creativity that comes from the person directing it.

"That's the way I want to look at games, that's how they need to be made."

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/artic...m-games-may-never-work-with-a-publisher-again
 

KomandaHeck

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,353
I don't know why anyone cares either way. Trying to quantify art has to rank as one of the most vapid conversations a person can have. All that is important is what value and meaning a piece has to you as an individual. By all means share your thoughts on it with others and listen to theirs, but attempting to match the work up to an imaginary set of criteria that signifies it's worthy of being placed in some higher cultural pantheon always leads to a dead end conversation and is a waste of time.
 

Vaibhav

Banned
Apr 29, 2018
340
Kamiya said:"to me.. .... "

Thats true. Games can be art form. Depends on creator. Not all Hollywood movies are artistic. Some are just to entertain you.
 

Kylo Rey

Banned
Dec 17, 2017
3,442
How do you show a tweet link on a thread ?
Sorry for bein out subject but i want to create a topic using a tweet.
Thx
 

Valcrist

Tic-Tac-Toe Champion
Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,692
Then we both agree his stuff aint art.

Though neither are they entertaining IMO

So I'll continue not playing them, egdelord.
Making edgy post while calling someone an edgelord. Hmmmm... anyway...

Some games are art because they make you think. Shadow of the Colossus is a good example.
Movies can also be art.
 

Somni

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
942
Much like film, video games can be a platform for both entertaining content and creative expression. Even then, those two qualities aren't mutually exclusive.

Why does it have to be one way or the other for so many people? Fucking hell...
 

Deleted member 29682

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 1, 2017
12,290
Art isn't consumed.

Take my comparison above as an example.

A proper "chef" who is putting work, imaginative effort, etc into producing "haute cuisine" versus me cracking open a box of Kraft Dinner.

They both involve combining ingredients, preparing along a specific set way for a specific result. Putting that result on a plate and eating it.

I am not a chef nor is Kraft Dinner "haute cuisine" even though they are 99% "the same" in broad context. That said, someone could take a box of Kraft Dinner and do something amazing with it and actually for real "elevate" it to "haute cuisine".

Words like "chef" and "art" and etc have specific meaning and simply blanket generalizations diminish from the meaning of "art".

So you're saying that the difference between "art" and "Art" is effort and imagination?

And if one does not consume "Art", what does one do with it? Is it just a poor choice of words or does it imply something that you take exception to?
 

dlauv

Prophet of Truth - One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,513
I just find it a bit confusing considering he said this not that long ago:

"My feeling is that games themselves... they're not just mass-produced things. They're art, they're part of the developer's personality. It's not like you just have the parts and a blueprint, then you assemble them like a car. I don't want games to be that way. I want games to be about each person's individuality, [so] players can feel the creativity that comes from the person directing it.

"That's the way I want to look at games, that's how they need to be made."

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/artic...m-games-may-never-work-with-a-publisher-again

Do you call your local dungeon master an artist? Maybe he changed his mind.
 
Oct 27, 2017
5,767
I just find it a bit confusing considering he said this not that long ago:

"My feeling is that games themselves... they're not just mass-produced things. They're art, they're part of the developer's personality. It's not like you just have the parts and a blueprint, then you assemble them like a car. I don't want games to be that way. I want games to be about each person's individuality, [so] players can feel the creativity that comes from the person directing it.

"That's the way I want to look at games, that's how they need to be made."

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/artic...m-games-may-never-work-with-a-publisher-again

He is clearly trolling with the thread topic Tweet. Yet people will fall for it for whatever their own personal biasses or not are on either side.
 
Oct 25, 2017
9,091
Hey also maybe he means to him, making games is not making art. His approach to games is not from the outlook of an artist. He doesn't consider his games art.

His English isn't perfect so I think there's plenty of room for that interpretation.
 

Sakujou

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
290
kamiya is soooo cool.
you dont have to agree with him, every country has a different concept of art. looking at the US with their glorifying military crap gives me goosebumps all the time. i dont like the lolification of stuff in japan, but i do like games such as katamari damacy, bayonetta, super mario or experimental stuff such as LSD back on PSX(even though i just played it a few years back on psp).

every dev can decide whether or not he wants to create art. i love kamiya for his own ways, and not trying to go with everyone else.
 

Sev

Member
Oct 27, 2017
422
So... all games are not art because he seems himself as an entertainer and not an artist?

The images on his screen when he talks speak for themselves though, lol. I don't have to wonder why he doesn't consider games art when looking at the ones he worked on.
 

NewGuy

Member
Nov 23, 2017
151
I believe he's supposed to be looking at smut in the monitor whilst tweeting via his cellphone.

It doesn't really have anything to do with tits or ass in games, that's not even something his games are known for.

well, that's unnecessary isn't it.


anyways there is plenty of developers who say the opposite, so unless he speaks for them this tweet really doesn't matter.
 

Liquid Snake

Member
Nov 10, 2017
1,893
Kamiya the edge lord. Yeah, we get it. You're a tortured... "entertainer". Yawn.


Oh, also, had anyone else noticed he's looking at porn in that cartoon? Fucking bizarre.
 

Zomba13

#1 Waluigi Fan! Current Status: Crying
Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,919
Do you call your local dungeon master an artist? Maybe he changed his mind.
I mean, why not? They create a world with characters and a story, they guide the player and try and create an experience for them where they will feel different emotions. Unless fiction is now suddenly not art?
 

HeRinger

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,302
By the definition of some people here, everything made with human thought can be considered art. It's a fair point of view, I guess.
 

The Albatross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,985
I respect that he's tweeting while watching internet porn on his desktop computer. Pretty good multi-tasking.

Regarding the substance...

Can games be art? Yes.
Are all games art? No.

Can music be art? Yes.
Is all music art? No.

If all games are art or all music is art or all of any creative expression is art, then you lose the meaning of art. Also if you start quoting the dictionary on this topic, then you've already missed the point.
 
Nov 2, 2017
6,804
Shibuya
The reason I find this shitty is that people were just innocently complimenting him by calling The Wonderful 101 art and he RTed them with "Fuck off" and blocked them, then he posts this comic edit insinuating they're like, pissy about it? That's super weird. I feel like this is the first time I think he's really off-base in a dumb way. You're totally allowed to say you don't think your stuff is art, but why are you treating fans like this?
 

Sailent

Member
Mar 2, 2018
1,591
He doesn't make games by himself. He has whole teams behind him. Maybe in that team we can find artists.

I myself make several cosplay props for a living, figures, clothing and such. But I don't consider myself and artist, that doesn't mean that what I do, for others it's considered "art".

Kamiya, dude, videogames require artworks to be developed, those artworks are born from ideas. Therefore, games are art, and art can be a form of entertainment.
 

Mr.Branding

Banned
May 11, 2018
1,407
Agree with him.
Some games qualify as art but I can count those on one hand.
The rest are commercial entertainment products.
 

dlauv

Prophet of Truth - One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,513
I mean, why not? They create a world with characters and a story, they guide the player and try and create an experience for them where they will feel different emotions. Unless fiction is now suddenly not art?

Because it's absurd. Not all fiction is art.
 
Jan 11, 2018
9,653
Good for him. He's free to express his opinion. His way of getting it across was slightly amusing, like how he drew himself with only a single hair.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.