Snowden has proven to be a known shit stirrer and has shit opinions. Openly dressed MET detectives are now UK secret police ? You want to know about secret police ask your host Putin.
It really could not be more obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together what their goals are, but Assange must still be charged in such a way as to not imperil legitimate journalists exposing the misdeeds of powerful institutions. If they hit him with the Espionage Act, that is some actually disturbing shit. My fear is that this is the avenue for Trump's DOJ to finally begin "opening up those libel laws" like he so desperately wants to do.
Where exactly did I say that? So you think the US DoJ is going to charge him for releasing that information? Sure.
if bolton/trump are involved in this, this is most likely the real reason
Should we love and celebrate someone who was instrumental in getting Trump elected instead? Someone who helped irreparably harm the country for decades?
Of course they are. Apparently that's totally a-okay with some people though because Trump or something.
Yes, I said I'd be happy with him being charged on rape allegations or hacking (of the DNC e-mails if he did so himself), so I must obviously support him.You support him right? Then you are wilfully over looking death that his has cause because he once did something good. Typical white man defense. Cant we just ignore that rape, those piles of dead bodies, just because he has adoring fanboys.
Snowden has proven to be a known shit stirrer and has shit opinions. Openly dressed MET detectives are now UK secret police ? You want to know about secret police ask your host Putin.
Where do you live? I think it's complicated as far as Snowden. Back in 2013 I thought so too. But the last six years, being stuck in Russia, I just have an issue with a lot of his tweets from that account.
let them fuck it up and then have him go to jail in swedenYeah I think it's good to be suspicious about the charges from the US. I don't want Bolton nor Trump involved in this. They have the subtlety of a hammer.
Of course they are. Apparently that's totally a-okay with some people though because Trump or something.
I mean, all that stuff just makes the Assange case so complicated to judge, but I honestly cannot fathom how anyone is happy with him being charged on these grounds.
Yes, I said I'd be happy with him being charged on rape allegations or hacking, so I must honestly support him.
That's what I love about discussions on this forum, this constant "You're not 100% with me? Must be one of them, then!" Really leads to fruitful and productive discussions.
U.S. Attorney EDVA
@EDVAnewsJulian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, charged in computer hacking conspiracy. Click here for copy of the indictment:
As much as I dislike Hillary. There's no way she's not a better choice than this fucking turd in office.ya cause Hillary would have been a GREAT choice lmao - id rather someone whos dumb and too stupid to realize his racism to that snake Hillary.
Whistleblowers are important, but that is not the role Assange played. He was an information broker, posing as a neutral clearing ground for information while actually seeking to effect a particular outcome by filtering what did and did not get released. Moreover, he repeatedly (and in some cases intentionally) allowed collateral damage via his releases by including identifying info for regular people (military sources, women voters in Turkey, etc.) who stood to be harmed.
If he had been everything he claimed to be, I think he would still be facing the same outcome here. And that's likely not a good thing - though perhaps he would already have been taken out by former collaborators with fewer scruples, like Russia.
The illegal wars carried out by the US, and notably, the UK, don't really matter when it comes down to it. You could see that in America when it came to 2016 and suddenly George Bush was a hero because something something poncho at Trump's inauguration. You repeatedly get rhetoric that Trump is far worse than Bush because all the lives lost in the Middle East aren't on home soil.
One doesn't have to currently like Assange, to be honest about why the US Government is gunning for him here. It's nothing to do with the things everyone is talking about in this topic. It's for sharing leaked information that made the US Government look like shit.
children in cagesya cause Hillary would have been a GREAT choice lmao - id rather someone whos dumb and too stupid to realize his racism to that snake Hillary.
The difference is Wikileaks worked in direct coordination with the Trump campaign.
You honestly believe that Trump has no awareness of his racism?ya cause Hillary would have been a GREAT choice lmao - id rather someone whos dumb and too stupid to realize his racism to that snake Hillary.
ya cause Hillary would have been a GREAT choice lmao - id rather someone whos dumb and too stupid to realize his racism to that snake Hillary.
You honestly believe that Trump has no awareness of his racism?
oooh. thank you, this is really well put.Whistleblowing has it's place as a positive thing, when the data that is released is narrowly focused on whatever is being highlighted.
Information is a pretty fucking powerful thing, and when used without care can result of innocent people at best being placed in danger. The likes of Wikileaks, Snowden, Assange etc have been guilty of releasing data for the sake of it, with little care in the implications of such actions beyond what they intended. That has major ramifications.
People see this now, such as the incidents shown in the threadmark. It should be no surprise that it comes down to the political intent of those behind Wikileaks what happens with that leaked information - and history has shown that Assange/Snowden et al should be treated with the contempt they deserve. It's only a matter of time before Snowden, the pawn he is, sees himself seeing the same kind of situation once his current hosts have determined he is of no further use.
I agree with you, but we cannot keep going on with the fucking tweet from Snowden about the elections, it's like he somehow got Trump elected because he simply said that both Trump and Hillary were shit.As much as I dislike Hillary. There's no way she's not a better choice than this fucking turd in office.
That post reeks of privilege and dishonesty. Straight to the ignore list. Pure trash.You honestly believe that Trump has no awareness of his racism?
Denying climate change.ya cause Hillary would have been a GREAT choice lmao - id rather someone whos dumb and too stupid to realize his racism to that snake Hillary.
Yup. And conviently, it allows people to forget about said war crimes. I'm all for prosecuting Assange for rape, but let's not pretend that's the only issue here
Ya, cause Hillary probably isn't all those things and more too.Denying climate change.
Locking kids in cages.
Inciting violence towards PoC.
Calling other countries shitholes.
A sexist piece of shit.
Rampant corruption.
Trying to fuck LGBTQ people
Nominating a known rapist called Kavanaugh as Supreme.
But sure, Hillary Clinton is worst than Trump. I don't even like her, but that statement is stupid.
This was an incredibly helpful post, thank you! In my head, I was thinking "Why are people so against a dude releasing information?" but this gave me exactly what I was looking for.Wikileaks selectively leaking the Panama Papers to protect Russian interests and suddenly not caring about transparency:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/1...-government-during-u-s-presidential-campaign/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...e-russian-authors-say/?utm_term=.8bbe74e163d8
https://www.theguardian.com/news/20...ma-papers-as-an-attempt-to-destabilise-russia
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/717458064324964352 (Also some antisemitism here, but I'll come back more to that one later)
Leaked Wikileaks emails proving that Assange did what he did to help Trump win:
https://thinkprogress.org/dump-of-w...on-assanges-conspiracy-theories-324923bf22a3/
https://theintercept.com/2018/02/14/julian-assange-wikileaks-election-clinton-trump/
Wikileaks twitter account posting stuff like Russian-propaganda conspiracy theories about MH17
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/492033939142619136?lang=en
Now, unlike the Panama Papers connected to Russian interests, which Wikileaks chose not to leak, Wikileaks was suddenly interested in transparency again when it came to stuff like, say, leaking information regarding rape victims in Saudi Arabia and the identity of gay men:
https://www.theverge.com/2016/8/23/...rsonal-data-exposed-rape-victims-saudi-arabia
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...ts-sensitive-medical-information-saudi-arabia
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...udi-arabia-homosexuality-arrest-a7206901.html
https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawo...sing-tyranny-or-a-tyrant-itself/#1518bdab7034
And the information of every woman voter in Turkey:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wikileaks-erdogan-emails_b_11158792
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...-of-the-Female-Population-of-Turkey-Last-Week
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016...-most-of-turkeys-adult-female-population.html
https://www.wired.com/2016/07/wikileaks-officially-lost-moral-high-ground/
Oh, and there was also those times where Wikileaks posted blatantly anti-Semitic stuff like this:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...ht-have-meant-by-that-anti-semitic-tweet.html
http://www.timesofisrael.com/wikile..._comment_id=1127039907342378_2005230816189945
The point being, Wikileaks under Assange was a thoroughly terrible organization not interested in transparency in any actual meaningful sense, not giving a damn who they hurt, and based on their selective interest in leaking information, what they do and don't leak, and the type of conspiracy nonsense posted to their Twitter, that they/Assange were very, very, very much connected to Russian interests. And that aside, the damage they did to Turkish and Saudi Arabian citizens with reckless release of information that serves no purpose at all other than to be damaging cannot be defended no matter how one feels about transparency (as it has nothing to do with transparency at all to begin with, as it's not useful to anything other than government interests in those countries and those that would wish to do harm at that information), especially with them giving up any claim to actually care about transparency regardless with their reaction to the Panama Papers.
Wikileaks under Assange was a terrible, terrible organization which was doing way too much harm to way too many people for those kinda reasons and more (as this naturally isn't even touching stuff like the rape accusations against Assange personally), but that stuff is a good starting point.
You're so full of shit mate LOL. Absolute trash.Ya, cause Hillary probably isn't all those things and more too.
The point is id rather someone who's dumb and falls over their untied shoelaces than Hillary who is just as bad, but smarter and can hide it.
Ya, cause Hillary probably isn't all those things and more too.
The point is id rather someone who's dumb and falls over their untied shoelaces than Hillary who is just as bad, but smarter and can hide it.
This was an incredibly helpful post, thank you! In my head, I was thinking "Why are people so against a dude releasing information?" but this gave me exactly what I was looking for.
I'm on the same boat. It's the first time I see people hating on this guy. It's also viewed on a pretty different lens here.
I sure hope this is a joke or something like that. Because, wow, this is so wrong.Ya, cause Hillary probably isn't all those things and more too.
The point is id rather someone who's dumb and falls over their untied shoelaces than Hillary who is just as bad, but smarter and can hide it.
Reading is hard.
ya cause Hillary would have been a GREAT choice lmao - id rather someone whos dumb and too stupid to realize his racism to that snake Hillary.
Because the dead gay and women Saudia Arabia and Turkey will never have their day in court because they are not white man with means. Instead of going to court and proving his innocent, this fucker ran away long enough for the statue of limitations to kick in on most of his rape charges. Sometimes the only solace victims of crimes get is for their attacker to be taken down on unrelated crimes. Tax evasion seems like such a milquetoast charge mob boss, but no one cries for Al Capone.I mean, all that stuff just makes the Assange case so complicated to judge, but I honestly cannot fathom how anyone is happy with him being charged on these grounds.
If Hillary were present, Brett Kavanagh and Neil Gorsuch would not be Supreme Court justices.Ya, cause Hillary probably isn't all those things and more too.
The point is id rather someone who's dumb and falls over their untied shoelaces than Hillary who is just as bad, but smarter and can hide it.
but ah, as the wise man (me) once said, would you still be happy if he never hurt anyone? makes you think.Because the dead gay and women Saudia Arabia and Turkey will never have their day in court because they are not white man with means. Instead of going to court and proving his innocent, this fucker ran away long enough for the statue of limitations to kick in on most of his rape charges. Sometimes the only solace victims of crimes get is for their attacker to be taken down on unrelated crimes. Tax evasion seems like such a milquetoast charge mob boss, but no one cries for Al Capone.