So basically the quack doctor, at the behest of the patient's idiot wife, actually filled out the prescription, but the hospital refuses to fulfill and administrate it on the hospitalized patient (with good reason), so they're suing and the judge found in favour of the doctor... man, there's a whole gallery of stupid here. Failures on numerous levels:
- the patient for (probably) not being vaccinated;
- the patient's wife for buying into ivermectin nonsense;
- the quack doctor for being a snake oil salesman;
- the judge for enabling that doctor.
This is what anti-science and anti-intellectualism in society leads you, I guess. I feel for the hospital, they are trapped here. They'll need to either administrate the drug and endanger the patient, or... well, I don't know what the consequences of disobeying the judge's order would be like in this case. A fine? Criminal charges? Can they counter-sue?
And if they refuse to administrate the drug and the patient dies, they'll be sued again for sure for "not giving a life saving medicine". If they do give the drug and the patient dies, I guess the blood will be on everyone else's hands, though.
I don't think they can do that, since he's hospitalized