https://q13fox.com/2019/02/04/judge...essor-in-sex-abuse-case-with-67-year-old-man/
Seems like we have a ways to go I'm some courts
Seems like we have a ways to go I'm some courts
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Judge calls girls, 13 & 14, ‘aggressors’ in sex abuse case with 67 yo man
- Thread starter BringBackSonics
- Start date
Someone needs to start looking into this judge. All these motherfuckers are projecting. You know he's looking out for his own kind.
.
Any time I see someone get off on a rape charge over concern of how "it might affect their future," it just sounds like a judge protecting them from the shit they're probably guilty of themselves.
I don't care if a bunch of teenage girls started a pillow fight in his front yard. If he bought or attempted to buy child pornography, then he deserves to have the book thrown at him.
Don't go blaming teenagers for acting as stupid as teenagers typically are.
Don't go blaming teenagers for acting as stupid as teenagers typically are.
Yeah, there's a reason why the law stipulates kids as minors, which makes this ruling all the more fucked.
The judge implies he has prior knowledge of the victims ('pretty familiar')... is he allowed to bring that knowledge into his argument if it was never part of the court case and the prosecutor has no chance to address it? Not a lawyer, but that feels off.
The entire thing is "off".
Someone really needs to start investigating this creepy ass judge.
He knows kids can't legally consent and made this ruling anyway.
When a judge drops a verdict like that, can nothing be done? Can't he be investigated for sheer incompetence and reaching a completely delusional, dangerous conclusion such as this? What the fuck.
Wonder why the judge is so familiar with the girls. Really should be looked into.
Also, wouldn't surprise me if the girls were black. Whenever some jackass like this refers to kids as the aggressors, usually a dog whistle to refer to black kids. They're kids for goodness sake, this sicko was trying to get sexual favors from them.
Also, wouldn't surprise me if the girls were black. Whenever some jackass like this refers to kids as the aggressors, usually a dog whistle to refer to black kids. They're kids for goodness sake, this sicko was trying to get sexual favors from them.
I can imagine the prosecutor going on after reading the case thinking it's going to be a slam dunk.
Then his face once he realized the judge is fucking crazy
100%. People who want to blame teenagers for coming on strong to a man 5 times their age are not looking at those teenagers as children but as sexual beings. That's a fucking problem.
User Banned (1 day): victim blaming
Sexually aggressive children are absolutely a thing, but most of the time it's the result of past abuse.
As a 67 year old, it shouldn't matter how "sexually aggressive" any child is; an adult should be mature enough to rebuff the advances of children
Children cannot consent to anything. This judge gave this guy a slap on the wrist for trying to fuck 13 and 14 year old girls when he's 67 years old.
Yes, I read the link. I wasn't saying I agreed with the judge, or that it was the childrens fault, I'm just talking from my experience as a foster parent that some kids have sexualized behavior from past abuse.
The article really doesn't give any details to the judges thinking or provide information as to what the evidence of the case is. What the article does provide is eyebrow rasing, but not enough information is provided for me to make an informed opinion.
The article really doesn't give any details to the judges thinking or provide information as to what the evidence of the case is. What the article does provide is eyebrow rasing, but not enough information is provided for me to make an informed opinion.
Especially since the girls didn't show up themselves. If he knows them and doesn't have a positive view of them, and they're not showing up to their own court case with him as judge... There's a lot of blanks that can be filled in...
From what I can tell the man did this willingly, so I don't understand why the girls were considered to be aggressors.
What information would exactly change anything? Because it wouldn't be the sexual aggressiveness of children which the judge seems to think is most valuable to cite. The sexual behavior of the children should have no bearing in a case that involves teens and a grown adult.
Because apparently they were soliciting for money which it's own set of issues and inal but it shouldn't really matter it's not like the girls had superpowers and he was powerless
It's crazy that someone with that poor of an understanding and perception of the world can be a judge, unless it really is projection. It's because of grown ups' lust for underage girls/boys that causes situations like these two girls are in, not because they are sex sirens no one can resist. Instead of attacking the character of the girls the judge should have expressed concern for them and vowed to find a way to get them the help they need to recover and to avoid this happening again.
Well, this is embarrassing. This is my hometown.
When someone offers you money at 13 or 14 years old for something like that, you aren't entirely aware of the consequences. You see money, something that can be hard for a young teen to come by but is most desired at this age. I also fail to how being submissive to someone else's demands makes you an "aggressor."
When someone offers you money at 13 or 14 years old for something like that, you aren't entirely aware of the consequences. You see money, something that can be hard for a young teen to come by but is most desired at this age. I also fail to how being submissive to someone else's demands makes you an "aggressor."
If the judge has seen the girls in his courtroom before, as he implies, he should have recused himself if he cannot be objective about the victims.
But if they have engaged in criminal activity at such a young age, that does suggest a home life where it's not very surprising that they would be desperate for money. In a more humane and rational person, that context would only make you more compassionate, not less.
Even if he's not a pedophile himself, the kind of Judge who dehumanizes and sneers at the people brought before him, even when they are victims, should not be on the bench.
It absolutely does, but in my limited understanding of the law the judge has to be willing to acknowledge that himself and the people who are most influenced and biased will seldom acknowledge said bias. His comments might help the prosecutor who is trying to push for a harsher sentencing, though.
But if they have engaged in criminal activity at such a young age, that does suggest a home life where it's not very surprising that they would be desperate for money. In a more humane and rational person, that context would only make you more compassionate, not less.
Even if he's not a pedophile himself, the kind of Judge who dehumanizes and sneers at the people brought before him, even when they are victims, should not be on the bench.
It absolutely does, but in my limited understanding of the law the judge has to be willing to acknowledge that himself and the people who are most influenced and biased will seldom acknowledge said bias. His comments might help the prosecutor who is trying to push for a harsher sentencing, though.
Shit doesn't seem right. If he has any prior knowledge of these girls, doesn't that introduce an element of bias in his ruling?
Exactly what I thought. He probably already meet the old man during a certain kind of party, if you know what I mean.
