It kind of does. It means the critics don't fully understand the situation. If a critic is gonna say it will inspire copycats then you have to address the gun issue more than the movie. There are more cogs than a film regarding shooters, so to use this as a critique against the film is short sighted. It would be like if I reviewed a car for being bad cause it gets into accidents when my country has no laws against driving wherever the fuck you want.
Liked it for sure. Definitely glad it sets itself apart from the formulaic superhero movies we're drowning in but a lot of the movie was still pretty stereotypical. The execution was still worthwhile.
People definitely overstated how messed up the movie was supposed to be though.
Yeah this movie isn't that transgressive, nor is it incel bait, it's just a depressing tale of mental illness and abuse.
I didn't really find it that emotional affecting other than when he checked the mail box and there wasn't any mail. I feel that. I want my parcels to arrive.
I really enjoy unreliable narrators, and I think this movie did it well. What I didn't like, though, was how
when it's revealed that he never actually had a relationship with that woman in his appartment complex, they had to pull a flashback scene of all the scenes where they were together to show he was actually alone. I'm not stupid. It devalued the twist.
I really enjoy unreliable narrators, and I think this movie did it well. What I didn't like, though, was how
when it's revealed that he never actually had a relationship with that woman in his appartment complex, they had to pull a flashback scene of all the scenes where they were together to show he was actually alone. I'm not stupid. It devalued the twist.
I really enjoy unreliable narrators, and I think this movie did it well. What I didn't like, though, was how
when it's revealed that he never actually had a relationship with that woman in his appartment complex, they had to pull a flashback scene of all the scenes where they were together to show he was actually alone. I'm not stupid. It devalued the twist.
I appreciated it because the moment she expresses that she cares about him after he creepily stalks her, like she was some Manic Pixie Dream Girl, I was going "huh?" She's on his wavelength the entire time, even during that godawful standup routine, which isn't natural knowing what we know of Arthur. So showing that it was another of his delusions made all too much sense.
Well that was something... I wish the musical choices were more creative. The rest... yea need to think on it. The people who love this will adore it, the people who hate it will loathe it. Im somewhere in the middle leaning towards that it could have done more with its premise.
Yeah this movie isn't that transgressive, nor is it incel bait, it's just a depressing tale of mental illness and abuse.
I didn't really find it that emotional affecting other than when he checked the mail box and there wasn't any mail. I feel that. I want my parcels to arrive.
but he says it himself, it's a comedy!
the guy who couldn't reach the door knob was pretty damn funny but extremely dark. Like that is a wild moment to put that joke.
I thought that the movie was a very powerful critique of American society and the way it can create a monster.
And Arthur/Joker is most definitely a monster at the end. I think the movie makes that very clear.
The movie didn't feel like incel bait to me at all. Seems like a lot of people just can't handle the critique of a cold and heartless society that the movie presents.
Yep, the movie makes it very apparent that all the sentiment around it was extremely overblown. No surprise, though, that's what happens nowadays before people even educate themselves on what they're ranting about.
I thought that the movie was a very powerful critique of American society and the way it can create a monster.
And Arthur/Joker is most definitely a monster at the end. I think the movie makes that very clear.
The movie didn't feel like incel bait to me at all. Seems like a lot of people just can't handle the critique of a cold and heartless society that the movie presents.
This movie was good for the most part. Great in the last 30 minutes.
Despite framing this as a sheer departure from the comics, this felt like one of the most realized Batman worlds ever put to screen. It actually makes sense for Bruce Wayne to dress up like a bat to fight this shit. That said I felt background parts of the narrative were rushed when they could've been bolstered to deliver a more powerful conclusion to Arthur's character which was my biggest overall issue.
Just left the theater. Great movie, stellar performances, cinematography, soundtrack.
Yes he's evil by the end of it but the movie absolutely wants you to sympathize with him and I completely understand the reading of it as an incel call-to-action.
Beyond that, my main critique is that this Joker is just...this guys too, I dunno, dumb? to go toe-to-toe with Batman. There's no way he could outwit him.
Just left the theater. Great movie, stellar performances, cinematography, soundtrack.
Yes he's evil by the end of it but the movie absolutely wants you to sympathize with him and I completely understand the reading of it as an incel call-to-action.
Beyond that, my main critique is that this Joker is just...this guys too, I dunno, dumb? to go toe-to-toe with Batman. There's no way he could outwit him.
I may be in the minority, but I didn't like it that much. I thought it was just okay, while the performances were great (mostly Joaquin), but the other stuff bothered me (personally, others may like it).
What I didn't like
The liberties of making Joker what caused the Waynes to die, the "twist" that I saw coming as soon as she knocked on his door, trying to tie the politics of today with the story (i.e. "resist", etc) in light of the directors comments on "woke culture"
Also, plus one for some people laughing at inappropriate parts. There was a dude right next to me who cracked up
This is one wild film, and he might have shot past Heath Ledger. it's a terrifying performance, even though some shots are literally straight out of The Dark Knight(the police car ride).
My favorite, most chilling shot:
When he's standing in the neighbor's doorway in shadow. Yeeeeesh.
I felt it could have worked as a standalone film, but I always enjoy seeing Gotham as a playground, so I have no objection.
So uh...
Did it say what happened to the 'girlfriend' and her daughter? The ambulance sirens afterward sounded like bad things.
But again, unreliable narration, which this film did very well. Kind of Perfect Blue-ish.
This was great. Definitely get the Taxi Driver vibes some of the reviews mentioned and have absolutely no fucking idea what the controversy was about.
Yes it was dark and uncomfortable and violent. No it didn't glorify any of it. Joaquin is so good in the role it was repulsive and downright depressing at times.
I may be in the minority, but I didn't like it that much. I thought it was just okay, while the performances were great (mostly Joaquin), but the other stuff bothered me (personally, others may like it).
What I didn't like
The liberties of making Joker what caused the Waynes to die, the "twist" that I saw coming as soon as she knocked on his door, trying to tie the politics of today with the story (i.e. "resist", etc) in light of the directors comments on "woke culture"
Also, plus one for some people laughing at inappropriate parts. There was a dude right next to me who cracked up
This is one wild film, and he might have shot past Heath Ledger. it's a terrifying performance, even though some shots are literally straight out of The Dark Knight(the police car ride).
My favorite, most chilling shot:
When he's standing in the neighbor's doorway in shadow. Yeeeeesh.
I felt it could have worked as a standalone film, but I always enjoy seeing Gotham as a playground, so I have no objection.
So uh...
Did it say what happened to the 'girlfriend' and her daughter? The ambulance sirens afterward sounded like bad things.
But again, unreliable narration, which this film did very well. Kind of Perfect Blue-ish.
Yeah that was pretty good , Joaquin Phoenix is obviously incredible
anyone else find it weird how that dude just gave him a gun? I thought it was going to be like he was trying to get Arthur fired or in trouble but it seems like he just gave him a gun for protection even though they clearly all think hes pretty weird
Yeah that was pretty good , Joaquin Phoenix is obviously incredible
anyone else find it weird how that dude just gave him a gun? I thought it was going to be like he was trying to get Arthur fired or in trouble but it seems like he just gave him a gun for protection even though they clearly all think hes pretty weird
connection there, especially when he was like "you're my boy", I felt like he may have abused him or had some kind of inappropriate relations with him, so I thought he was genuinely trying to protect him.
Yeah that was pretty good , Joaquin Phoenix is obviously incredible
anyone else find it weird how that dude just gave him a gun? I thought it was going to be like he was trying to get Arthur fired or in trouble but it seems like he just gave him a gun for protection even though they clearly all think hes pretty weird
The reason Arthur ends up killing him and is pissed off at him by snitching about the gun in the subsequent scene at his workplace, is that he learned that the guy who gave him the gun was talking to others about he was trying to buy a gun off of him. This was after he got fired from his hospital gig, where he's told about this by someone on the phone.
I'm not sure if there was more elaboration on this point, but I think the assumption is that he was trying to get rid of the gun for whatever reason and just threw it to Arthur. Same reason he goes to his apartment out of "concern" for him after his mother dies, when he's really only there to have him talk to the cops and take the heat off of himself.
The entire character should have been cut from the film, it's pointless and adds nothing but thematic confusion and potential controversy. On the other hand, it's obvious why they didn't.
The entire character should have been cut from the film, it's pointless and adds nothing but thematic confusion and potential controversy. On the other hand, it's obvious why they didn't.
I do agree with the criticism that Joaquin was rather one-note. The best part was when he was talking to the two detectives outside of the hospital. Now THAT attitude felt like the Joker.
The reason Arthur ends up killing him and is pissed off at him by snitching about the gun in the subsequent scene at his workplace, is that he learned that the guy who gave him the gun was talking to others about he was trying to buy a gun off of him. This was after he got fired from his hospital gig, where he's told about this by someone on the phone.
I'm not sure if there was more elaboration on this point, but I think the assumption is that he was trying to get rid of the gun for whatever reason and just threw it to Arthur. Same reason he goes to his apartment out of "concern" for him after his mother dies, when he's really only there to have him talk to the cops and take the heat off of himself.
Yeah okay that's what I thought ,I caught all that I guess I just thought they'd explain his reason for dumping it on him like that but I guess it doesnt really matter
I do agree with the criticism that Joaquin was rather one-note. The best part was when he was talking to the two detectives outside of the hospital. Now THAT attitude felt like the Joker.
Just got back from the Alamo Drafthouse. Wonderful film. Exactly what I wanted it to be. Unreliable narrator story telling really sold it. Great film. This is what should have started the DCU.
It's incredibly on the nose. Often it literally spells out what it's trying to say. It's not intelligently or cleverly written. I don't really understand why Joaquin decided to participate on this project.
Yeah, I just saw it.. and loved it. However, I did sympathize with Arthur, at least during the first 45 minutes.
You realized the guy is mentally lost from the beginning, but hell, I felt "poor guy" during some situations.
I was really rooting for him when he killed at least the first two wall streets guys in the subway when he was being beaten, but then he fucking killed the third one who was trying to escape, and there is where I had to accept the dude is a psychopath and complete murderer.
Although, the dude was really looking forward to stop laughing in order to not get into trouble; it seemed like an accidental kill or in defense, but it ended up being a total cold blood cowardly act.
Fantastic film, loved it. Cinematography was on point. If I had to gripe about something, I felt Arthur was a bit dumb. Joker usually is portrayed as a pretty witty foe, this guy not so much. Just plain nuts. But, I understand they were going in a different direction with him.
I loved how they handled Wayne and his family. It would incredible to see a sequel to this film with Batman versus the Joker and his legion of fanatics. They made Gotham looks so damn dark and gritty, would be a shame to pass that up.
Yea I thought this was pretty great. It dodged a lot of the pitfalls I expected it to fall into. The tension level in some of the scenes near the end was through the roof.
Fantastic film, loved it. Cinematography was on point. If I had to gripe about something, I felt Arthur was a bit dumb. Joker usually is portrayed as a pretty witty for, this guy not so much. Just plain nuts. But, I understand they were going a different direction with him.
I loved how they handled Wayne and his family. It would incredible to see sequel to this film with Batman versus the Joker and his legion of fanatics. They made Gotham looks so damn dark and gritty, would be a shame to pass that up.
I think they were really trying to establish Joker being 30 years old in this film. Let's say Bruce is like...12, max. He most often debuts as Batman when he's 25, so that would make Joker 45.
I much prefer Bat and Joker being closer in age so that Joker can keep up.
About to see a 10:00 O'Clock showing, have one cop car stationed with a cop patrolling the inside and outside area. Expecting the film to be good-to-great.