Allowed? Welcome to every case ever. It comes down to whether or not the jury actually believes the coached testimony.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Johnny Depp v Amber Heard's defamation trial is underway [UPDATE: Verdict reached. Johnny Depp won.]
- Thread starter WinFonda
- Start date
- Status
Yes, they can prod at her if she coordinated with her legal team over past 10 days. They did so much repair work on things she had said, timelines she had laid out etc.
Still if she flatly denies it and doesn't give opening to go deeper then Team Depp shouldn't waste time on that. It's something that is very hard to prove.
They want to 'explain' it... Essentially trying to gaslight the jury as well.
'You didn't hear what you were hearing'.
She's insane.
Are all the audio recordings presented so far of her initiating and him reacting?
Maybe it's to pre-empt Depp's side from presenting it first...? That way, they can try to provide some "context" for it since it's so damning on its own. Otherwise, that seems like something you'd bury forever. (I don't know why Heard wouldn't have deleted it to begin with, though.)
... Except, it's already been played by Johnny's team during his testimony.
She's trying to bullshit her way through it. Please, for all that is good, I hope the jury see through her lies.
I mean her excuse that she was trying to force her way into the bathroom because she was worried about him when in the audio he's clearly lucid and clearly doesn't want her anywhere near him…
That was a major fuck up. I don't even know why they played the audio at all if that's how they collectively decided to argue it. And this isn't Amber. Her lawyers told her to say that and thought it would be a good idea.
That was a major fuck up. I don't even know why they played the audio at all if that's how they collectively decided to argue it. And this isn't Amber. Her lawyers told her to say that and thought it would be a good idea.
Man her explanations of the first tape just doesn't line up at all. She's calling him a baby for running away and admitting she started a fight in it, but she's trying to say she was the victim and hiding from him? And then her next argument for the next tape was "I was lying in it"? The tapes since they're real damning but these explanations are really shit.
Callback to her testimony from 10+ days ago. I think she takes truths and then adds made up shit on top to make it fit her narrative so we get these weird situations where she is in 5 different positions and locations at once. Basically what Dr. Curry told us what person with personality disorders that Amber has does often.
It's why they did that clean up at beginning of today.
Been like that since Amber took stand almost 2 weeks ago for first time. Getting ultra leading questions and told what to say or not to say.
Jesus CHRIST, if anyone still believes this person.
"So scary... I was scared. I was afraid he wouldn't remember."
... What?!
She clearly wasn't scared in the video, so she caught herself (she was smirking and laughing).
"So scary... I was scared. I was afraid he wouldn't remember."
... What?!
She clearly wasn't scared in the video, so she caught herself (she was smirking and laughing).
Yeah, every time Heard's side show that video they intentionally cut it off before the smirk.
At this point, it's incredibly foolish for any normal human being to believe anything that woman spews out of her mouth.
Looooooooooool she's blaming the dog for the poop in the bed loooooool.
The poop was almost the size of the dog...
She's such a liar, wow.
The poop was almost the size of the dog...
She's such a liar, wow.
My dog had accidents in the house but he wouldn't have shat in my bed any more than he would his. They have standards.
This was happening before the trial break. She was very tangential and very flowery with her word choice in the days leading up to the break. This, combined with Depp's team constantly throwing out objections, resulted in her attorney basically telling her what and how to say things while testifying.
With the 10-day break, she was likely coached further about what to say once she returned to the stand. It'll be interesting to see how she performs under cross without an attorney to guide her responses.
Listening to Heard say "jovial" might have been the most unnatural thing I've heard a human being say in my entire life.
I know we've discussed LegalBytes (the YT channel) here before and their less than flattering guests but 3 of the laywers regularly appearing on this channel are actually in the court room today and will discuss later their observations about they jury and their reactions... I'm definitely waiting for this discussion later today.
Bit annoying it's on a shitty YT channel but I really want to hear that stuff. Would be interesting to hear if the jury look sympathetic or not.
Why not admit that? Not admitting it makes your whole story weaker. If you lie about this, what are you also lying about?
That's been the entire issue with her testimony. She's admitting to nothing.
- Status