Multiple pictures, same lighting, same clothing… first she says "the next day", the rest? Some time after.
I mean come on.
I mean come on.
The trial.
They have to, they took the case and got paid for it; I can't imagine how you could though seeing it all laid out like this.
Rihanna was struck 3 times. Amber says it was 10-20.After all what she said and explained I expected a Rihanna-like photo of injuries. WTF is this?
She would be in a coma or even dead from 10-20 hits.she healed up real good in just 2 days. nose doesn't look broken at all, i'm shocked.
Rihanna was struck 3 times. Amber says it was 10-20.
"He's no angel"I'm not saying she's not lying but do all you believe johnny is some angel that hasn't been abusive at all?
Absolutely not. Both of them suck, but for different reasons.I'm not saying she's not lying but do all you believe johnny is some angel that hasn't been abusive at all?
I feel gross even listening to this and trying to give credence to Heard's words versus what we're seeing. And I'm really struggling.
This was Heard's testimony.
"He pummeled me."
"He dragged my by the hair up the stairs."
"You could find my hair all around the house."
"He hit me in the face with his casted hand."
That is what she said. That is how she described the violence.
These photos do not show those injuries.
I...feel like I'm going crazy watching this and trying to make sense of it.
I'm not saying she's not lying but do all you believe johnny is some angel that hasn't been abusive at all?
I'm not saying she's not lying but do all you believe johnny is some angel that hasn't been abusive at all?
No, but this case is not about DV. It is about whether the 2018 op-ed is defamation.I'm not saying she's not lying but do all you believe johnny is some angel that hasn't been abusive at all?
I absolutely believe that Johnny Depp was at the very least verbally abusive in this relationship. He admitted it in his own testimony.
And I want to believe Heard here. But those photos. I almost would have preferred not seeing them.
This case is the exact moment "not an angel" rhetoric became acceptable for a lot of people; I don't know any angelic adult abuse victims.I'm not saying she's not lying but do all you believe johnny is some angel that hasn't been abusive at all?
I don't think this argument is ever going to be one to win with some people. Apparently when you're being abused, emotionally, mentally, physically, you're supposed to just sit there and take it like a kind human being and never develop unhealthy coping skills or verbally lash out to your friends or defend yourself.Once again talking shit about your abuser and getting mad around them doesn't make you 'no angel' just as bad as your abuser or even in the same vicinity.
I'm not saying she's not lying but do all you believe johnny is some angel that hasn't been abusive at all?
Yeah cuts from thick pieces of glass will go very deep, it's hard to believe the wound would close without stitches. Cut my hand once with a pyrex pan that shattered and it required five stitches. Still has a very thick, obvious scar even though it was almost a year ago.
It does come across like she's describing walking on glass with shoes on instead of bare feet....
I was wondering when the both sides argument would return. Mixed with a good old dose of "he was no angel".
No that's just the reality of the situation that they both suck
Yeah, I'm done with the "both of them are bad" arguments at this point... one of them is almost gone-girl levels of batshit abusive and the other is what? a substance abuser who sometimes falls asleep in the sand and tries to run from physical fights?
It's not even close.
And we have people in here saying his career should also be over and numerous "both as bad" takes.
Honestly it's disgusting.