It seems designed to keep pushing her narrative and make it look like the justice system failed her.
Basically, yeah the verdicts are gonna stand, and this is a waste of time.
It is a sad truth that no matter how progressive and open to discussion one thinks they are, the denial of reality can happenWe deadass have a Q-anon level distance in perceiving this whole event and if sucks to see her think i'm subject to propaganda and unchecked bias/projection of male victimhood.
There was a crowdfunding/charity campaign? For what?The unsealed documents were released today after the crowdfunding/charity campaign.
Because the documents cost 3,000 dollars and then whatever was left went to charity.
Oh for the documents? Got it.Because the documents cost 3,000 dollars and then whatever was left went to charity.
This is something that really needs to get wider recognition, regarding the UK trial. "...the UK Judgement is lacking in any evidentiary factual value".
Look up Emily Baker's video on the lawsuits between AH's insurance providers, there's more of her bizarre behavior there lol
Look up Emily Baker's video on the lawsuits between AH's insurance providers, there's more of her bizarre behavior there lol
Vardy spaffed 3 million on a case she never really had a chance to win.If anyone wants a bit of levity and want to read up on another defamation trial with very different scope but also a heartening outcome I suggest everyone reads up on the Colleen Rooney vs Rebekah Vardy case in the UK. It was pretty weird, two of the most high profile defamation trials I've ever heard about were running concurrently.
https://andreaburkhart.com/documentsThe unsealed documents were released today after the crowdfunding/charity campaign.
It's not just photocopying.https://andreaburkhart.com/documents
Total 6642 pages of unsealed documents. No wonder why it cost over $3,300 to have the court photocopy every page.
I'll keep my eye out for interesting excerpts and summaries. I'm glad it's now scanned, all online, and available for free for everyone that wants it. But I'm not reading all those 6642 pages. I read the 100+ page UK judgement document, but this I'll wait for summaries and excerpts.
Amber Heard's financial status is not good at all following the trial against her ex-husband Jonny Deep, but the actress startled everyone by filing for bankruptcy after finding herself unable to pay the Pirates of the Caribbean actor's court punishment.
Amber Heard declared bankruptcy on July 20 and appealed to the Commonwealth of Virginia on July 21. Due to a lack of resources, the 35-year-old woman would be requesting that the decision be declared null and void.
Amber Heard Declares Bankruptcy: Unable To Pay Johnny Depp
Amber Heard Declares Bankruptcy: Unable To Pay Johnny Depp
Amber Heard's financial status is bad following the trial against her ex-husband Johnny Deep, but the actress filed for bankruptcyguardian.ng
I think they all were either banned or got scared off from posting their bullshit here. No idea about other places or what the general public thinks.Sorry if it's off-topic to the case at hand, but for anyone keeping closer tabs on this case, is there still a vocal group of people supportive of AH/Claiming JD winning most of the verdicts is somehow not a fair judgment or a "perversion of justice"?
Wonder if she's trying to pull an Alex Jones and is just trying to get out of paying. If so hopefully she's denied bankruptcy like Alex Jones was.Amber Heard Declares Bankruptcy: Unable To Pay Johnny Depp
Amber Heard Declares Bankruptcy: Unable To Pay Johnny Depp
Amber Heard's financial status is bad following the trial against her ex-husband Johnny Deep, but the actress filed for bankruptcyguardian.ng
Definitely on other sitesSorry if it's off-topic to the case at hand, but for anyone keeping closer tabs on this case - is there still a vocal group of people supportive of AH/Claiming JD winning most of the verdicts is somehow not a fair judgment or a "perversion of justice"?
No, that's a suspension bond to keep Depp from executing the judgment against herI'm confused. I thought she had to put up the money as bond in order to appeal.
She ain't getting out of this one. Sorry, Amber.Amber Heard Declares Bankruptcy: Unable To Pay Johnny Depp
Amber Heard Declares Bankruptcy: Unable To Pay Johnny Depp
Amber Heard's financial status is bad following the trial against her ex-husband Johnny Deep, but the actress filed for bankruptcyguardian.ng
Anything is possible but I think it's more likely that she may legitimately not have the money. Her filmography would indicate she probably doesn't. It looks like her peak net worth a few years back was sitting around 9 or $10 million, which is more money than most of us on this forum will ever see but by Hollywood career standards isn't much money at all.Wonder if she's trying to pull an Alex Jones and is just trying to get out of paying. If so hopefully she's denied bankruptcy like Alex Jones was.
Progressive media and academia and visible social media figures/content creators as well as most progressive/non-male leaning communities on sites such as reddit have grown in that belief over the course of the case and some subreddits like say /r/GamerGhazi enshrined support of Amber in their rules.Sorry if it's off-topic to the case at hand, but for anyone keeping closer tabs on this case - is there still a vocal group of people supportive of AH/Claiming JD winning most of the verdicts is somehow not a fair judgment or a "perversion of justice"?
I don't find it particularly important to attack Amber more than it is to attack narrative she constructed and challenge the influencers/communities that want to push her line unchecked.She ain't getting out of this one. Sorry, Amber.
I don't want to celebrate people's lives falling apart... But she really only has herself to blame. I can't even muster an ounce of sympathy for her.
I'll never forget how her goddamn gaslighting affected me while listening to her testimony. I almost wanted to believe her, because I refused to believe that people like her actually exist.
What she said during her testimony didn't make any sense and she constantly changed things up, got caught in lies/contradictions etc. I can't even imagine what it must've felt like being in the midst of that for years on end... It affected me just by listening to a goddamn testimony.
She deserves everything bad coming her way.
Sorry if it's off-topic to the case at hand, but for anyone keeping closer tabs on this case - is there still a vocal group of people supportive of AH/Claiming JD winning most of the verdicts is somehow not a fair judgment or a "perversion of justice"?
They're both equally shitty, IMO.I don't find it particularly important to attack Amber more than it is to attack narrative she constructed and challenge the influencers/communities that want to push her line unchecked.
I think that's something a lot of people who're anti-Depp miss when they call out attacks on her and how much of it's actually people correcting what we see (know) as lies and not simply backing down- because this isn't close to over.
Amber Heard Declares Bankruptcy: Unable To Pay Johnny Depp
Amber Heard Declares Bankruptcy: Unable To Pay Johnny Depp
Amber Heard's financial status is bad following the trial against her ex-husband Johnny Deep, but the actress filed for bankruptcyguardian.ng
...But did she, though? Did she really...[...]but the actress startled everyone by filing for bankruptcy[...]
So, having recently seen The Rainmaker, does this mean that by declaring bankruptcy Heard doesn't have to pay a cent? Cause that's kind of fucked up.
This take needs to fucking stop. No one cares if you think both people are shitty. One person clearly assaulted the other and then gaslighted said person. Not only that they made it more difficult for men to come forward since it helped prove how hard it is for us; plus how the media will treat the victim.
Saying they are both shitty feels like you are dismissing everything and saying it doesn't matter because both people are bad.
I'm pretty sure they meant both Amber and the influencers/communities supporting her in that statement.
I agree but that definitely wasn't Finnegan's intent; they are firmly pro-Depp and anti-Heard.No, in Virginia there are certain rules/laws that precede calling bankruptcy. The court found her to have acted in malice, so declaring bankruptcy wouldn't help her here since acting in malice means you will have to pay somehow no matter if you do not have the money.
This take needs to fucking stop. No one cares if you think both people are shitty. One person clearly assaulted the other and then gaslighted said person. Not only that they made it more difficult for men to come forward since it helped prove how hard it is for us; plus how the media will treat the victim.
Saying they are both shitty feels like you are dismissing everything and saying it doesn't matter because both people are bad.
I looked into the paper and it is a real one, but unaffiliated with other Guardian newspapers. I don't know if the article is correct (if there aren't any other reports from sources closer to the events then it's unlikely to be), but the website is not a fake news mill.Is Guardian Nigeria a reliable source? I ask as I haven't heard of them before nor seen this be picked up any major outlet.
I'm pretty sure they meant both Amber and the influencers/communities supporting her in that statement.
Law and Lumber an amazing source on all thing's Depp/Heard and who disproved Amber's claims about how the bed was broken debunked the article and gave clarification on everything.I looked into the paper and it is a real one, but unaffiliated with other Guardian newspapers. I don't know if the article is correct (if there aren't any other reports from sources closer to the events then it's unlikely to be), but the website is not a fake news mill.
Jeff Grubb thats a game journalist/'insider" always coming up on the gaming forum is.Sorry if it's off-topic to the case at hand, but for anyone keeping closer tabs on this case - is there still a vocal group of people supportive of AH/Claiming JD winning most of the verdicts is somehow not a fair judgment or a "perversion of justice"?
You've clearly never read a single thing I've ever posted on this topic.No, in Virginia there are certain rules/laws that precede calling bankruptcy. The court found her to have acted in malice, so declaring bankruptcy wouldn't help her here since acting in malice means you will have to pay somehow no matter if you do not have the money.
This take needs to fucking stop. No one cares if you think both people are shitty. One person clearly assaulted the other and then gaslighted said person. Not only that they made it more difficult for men to come forward since it helped prove how hard it is for us; plus how the media will treat the victim.
Saying they are both shitty feels like you are dismissing everything and saying it doesn't matter because both people are bad.