There are other non-trivial differences that will require more devs input to explain:
The difference is now you're tweaking LOD settings on the horizon versus 10m in front of the player. It truly is at the point of diminishing returns.
Bolded the interesting. So when DF talks about shadows and ambient shadows and some texture quality in the latest Crash Bandicoot tech review, he talks about the base machines could have been the starting point for each, which resulted in lower quality areas in the 1X version vs the Pro. Is this the sort of thing your talking about?
Well yes, if developers choose to hold back or just not bother to utilize the extra power then that's the only times you'll see these discrepancies. I think something like RDR2 is a good example to show the actual performance and visual differences in current gen consoles. Both consoles are used to max capacity and there is a noticeable difference. Whenever this happens next gen, the same should happen ideally if they're both utilized fully.
But even then, that's not even a straight 20% of additional power.
Yeah sorry I am no expert I just vaguely remembered what Cerny said and that it has some important implications for RAM usage.
This is interesting to read through. Though I'm not sure I understand what you are saying about the audio. Xbox has a new dedicated audio chip that sounded like it was being compared to the one Sony is marketing heavily as Tempest. They seemed to say theirs helps ease the CPU as well.
I am speculating based off facts that the Series X is the more powerful console. Why wouldnt the more powerful console perform better??
Hey Matt, one more question, if you have time (this is probably a complex question), what does slower I/O speeds mean for graphics comparison?
If people dont want to notice, or care about the difference that is fine. All i am saying is there will be a difference. These consoles are not equal.
But people WILL be able to tell a difference. If the difference is what you described, then people will absolutely be able to tell a difference.
So why can't Devs also run the game on 1800p on on XSX and switch on some more bells and whistles?
But they are the same. And right , its not. But xbox is more powerful in ALL aspects minus the SSD. Will you not be able to notice the difference in the SSD either?
It will be obviously noticable . Will it be enough for people to care? Probably not. But it will still be noticeable . Thats all i am saying. And im directing this to the people that are saying there will be no noticeable differnce.
nah I think it was the other way around or something lol
Chad warden was PlayStation's marketing manager at the launch of ps3. He was unfortunately fired for inappropriate use of racial slurs.
Ryzen 5 3400 @ 4.2 GHz
That was joke. He was an unoffical Mascot for PS3 during the other-site days. He gained noteriarity being a Youtube influencer for PlayStation before that was even a thing. He was like the first YouTube fanboy in a way,
Sure. People say they cant tell the difference between 30 and 60fps. People say they cant tell the difference between 1440p and 4k. There is obviously a large group of people that cannot see these things or care so little about it that is not an issue for them.
Sure. I mean, really the only thing that matters is having fun playing games on the console you have. But it isnt specualtion. Xbox is still the more powerful console and it will be noticeable . Thats how things work.
Yeah, that's what I thought. :)
What people care about isnt the discussion here. The discussion is that there will be no noticeable difference. I am not with that.
