niceWait. They didn't apply for a Paycheck Protection Program grant, yet one magically appeared in their vault?
Lord, it's the Immaculate Deception!
According to a statement from Lakewood spokesperson David Iloff, the church's PPP loan was used to provide support for the church's employees.
Iloff went on to say, "Believing the shutdown would only last a few weeks, Lakewood did not initially apply for PPP assistance during the first half of the program. However, as the shutdown persisted month after month, given the economic uncertainty, Lakewood finally applied for the PPP loan and has been able to provide full salaries and benefits including health insurance coverage to all of its employees and their families."
Even with such a hefty loan amount, none of the PPP loan was used to pay pastors Joel or Victoria Olsteen, as neither of the them have received salaries from Lakewood Church since 2004.
Nah I would not trust that at all since they already lied.
He lives in a $10 million dollar mansion, in the most luxurious part of Houston. Tax the Churches. At least the ones helmed by televangelist grifters.
Its all a scam.I can believe that but what I'm most perplexed by is that, with how wealthy they are, they didn't have savings or investments or whatever to get by for this first year of the pandemic.
That PPP money could've actually gone to people that needed it.
Wait. They didn't apply for a Paycheck Protection Program grant, yet one magically appeared in their vault?
Lord, it's the Immaculate Deception!
All my thoughts exactly and then some, well said.This was also the megachurch that, IIRC, was turning people away at the door during a major storm emergency a few years ago.
I don't really have a problem churches applying for and getting relief. In cities like mine, religious groups are often the front-line for food and housing relief in emergencies, and with churches being closed around us for about half the year, fundraising dried up completely. Especially with schools closed, churches and church run food pantries were some of the only places that people could get a hot meal, take shelter for a few hours, do laundry, or get clean clothes. Ideally I think most of us would want the government to provide this relief, and in some places it does, but it usually doesn't, and so non-profits like churches often fill the gap (or provide the bulk of unmet need) and it's one of those things where your ideological purity -- "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE UBER ALLES!" -- is out of touch with the reality of people who need help and the groups helping them.
That said -- I have a problem with clearly profit-driven corporations run by eccentric multi-millionaire or billiionaires like JOel Osteen getting PPP funding.
I can believe that but what I'm most perplexed by is that, with how wealthy they are, they didn't have savings or investments or whatever to get by for this first year of the pandemic.
That PPP money could've actually gone to people that needed it.
I mean, they are already flush with cash, grabbing up this loan money for themselves wouldn't be worth the potential pushback.
They still need to be taxed to all fuck.
The PPP money is for payroll and employee benefits. While they are personally flush with cash, why would they dip into their own personal money to pay their employees? It is a business after all, and the PPP is used to help businesses.
Honestly, I don't see much of an issue here and I'm an atheist that thinks that smiling fuck is slimy. But, if they qualify for a PPP, I don't see the issue. Either their employees get paid or they get laid off. Why should a business owner have to dip into their own personal money to pay their employees when the government is offering a lifeline?
This was also the megachurch that, IIRC, was turning people away at the door during a major storm emergency a few years ago.
I don't really have a problem churches applying for and getting relief. In cities like mine, religious groups are often the front-line for food and housing relief in emergencies, and with churches being closed around us for about half the year, fundraising dried up completely. Especially with schools closed, churches and church run food pantries were some of the only places that people could get a hot meal, take shelter for a few hours, do laundry, or get clean clothes. Ideally I think most of us would want the government to provide this relief, and in some places it does, but it usually doesn't, and so non-profits like churches often fill the gap (or provide the bulk of unmet need) and it's one of those things where your ideological purity -- "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE UBER ALLES!" -- is out of touch with the reality of people who need help and the groups helping them.
That said -- I have a problem with clearly profit-driven corporations run by eccentric multi-millionaire or billiionaires like JOel Osteen getting PPP funding.
The PPP money is for payroll and employee benefits. While they are personally flush with cash, why would they dip into their own personal money to pay their employees? It is a business after all, and the PPP is used to help businesses.
Honestly, I don't see much of an issue here and I'm an atheist that thinks that smiling fuck is slimy. But, if they qualify for a PPP, I don't see the issue. Either their employees get paid or they get laid off. Why should a business owner have to dip into their own personal money to pay their employees when the government is offering a lifeline?
Then pay them has nothing to do with them getting funds they should not. These Mega churches has a shit ton of money to pay them.As much as I hate Joel Osteen, a church still has to pay its employees.
Then pay them has nothing to do with them getting funds they should not. These Mega churches has a shit ton of money to pay them.
their employees need to eat and pay bills just like everybody else'sThen pay them has nothing o do with them getting funds they should not.
He's a millionaire. He can pay his employees. Hell, regular church donations probably paid his employees.As much as I hate Joel Osteen, a church still has to pay its employees.
The PPP money is for payroll and employee benefits. While they are personally flush with cash, why would they dip into their own personal money to pay their employees? It is a business after all, and the PPP is used to help businesses.
Honestly, I don't see much of an issue here and I'm an atheist that thinks that smiling fuck is slimy. But, if they qualify for a PPP, I don't see the issue. Either their employees get paid or they get laid off. Why should a business owner have to dip into their own personal money to pay their employees when the government is offering a lifeline?
This was also the megachurch that, IIRC, was turning people away at the door during a major storm emergency a few years ago.
I don't really have a problem churches applying for and getting relief. In cities like mine, religious groups are often the front-line for food and housing relief in emergencies, and with churches being closed around us for about half the year, fundraising dried up completely. Especially with schools closed, churches and church run food pantries were some of the only places that people could get a hot meal, take shelter for a few hours, do laundry, or get clean clothes. Ideally I think most of us would want the government to provide this relief, and in some places it does, but it usually doesn't, and so non-profits like churches often fill the gap (or provide the bulk of unmet need) and it's one of those things where your ideological purity -- "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE UBER ALLES!" -- is out of touch with the reality of people who need help and the groups helping them.
That said -- I have a problem with clearly profit-driven corporations run by eccentric multi-millionaire or billiionaires like JOel Osteen getting PPP funding.
if it's a business it should be taxed
all the tax paying businesses that don't have an owner with a net worth of 60 million dollars and yearly contributions of 80 million dollars also have payroll and employees and have to scramble and get denied or delayed that PPP money while places like Lakewood get to grab another piece of the pie.
He has the ability to pay them out of his own pocketAs much as I hate Joel Osteen, a church still has to pay its employees.