• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

mclem

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,456
Wait. They didn't apply for a Paycheck Protection Program grant, yet one magically appeared in their vault?

Lord, it's the Immaculate Deception!
 

Aftervirtue

Banned
Nov 13, 2017
1,616
He lives in a $10 million dollar mansion, in the most luxurious part of Houston. Tax the Churches. At least the ones helmed by televangelist grifters.

50aq6oe23d561.jpg
 

The Albatross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
39,038
This was also the megachurch that, IIRC, was turning people away at the door during a major storm emergency a few years ago.

I don't really have a problem churches applying for and getting relief. In cities like mine, religious groups are often the front-line for food and housing relief in emergencies, and with churches being closed around us for about half the year, fundraising dried up completely. Especially with schools closed, churches and church run food pantries were some of the only places that people could get a hot meal, take shelter for a few hours, do laundry, or get clean clothes. Ideally I think most of us would want the government to provide this relief, and in some places it does, but it usually doesn't, and so non-profits like churches often fill the gap (or provide the bulk of unmet need) and it's one of those things where your ideological purity -- "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE UBER ALLES!" -- is out of touch with the reality of people who need help and the groups helping them.

That said -- I have a problem with clearly profit-driven corporations run by eccentric multi-millionaire or billiionaires like JOel Osteen getting PPP funding.
 
Last edited:
Oct 25, 2017
5,537
I CAN FEEL THE HEALING POWER OF THE LORD COME TO ME IN THE FORM OF $4.4 MILLION FROM THE GOVERNMENT HALLELUJAH HAVE FAITH AND TITHE A $100 SEED OF GRACE AND PROVE YOUR FAITH IN JESUS THAT YOU TOO MAY BE GIVEN GOVERNMENT FUNDING
 

CatAssTrophy

Member
Dec 4, 2017
7,620
Texas
Must be nice being not only a big business corporate entity but also technically a religious organization so that you don't have to pay taxes, but can still benefit from all of the worst parts of capitalism and greed.

One of my coworkers goes to his church and defends the guy, and I absolutely judge him for it.
 

BossAttack

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,996
According to the article:
According to a statement from Lakewood spokesperson David Iloff, the church's PPP loan was used to provide support for the church's employees.

Iloff went on to say, "Believing the shutdown would only last a few weeks, Lakewood did not initially apply for PPP assistance during the first half of the program. However, as the shutdown persisted month after month, given the economic uncertainty, Lakewood finally applied for the PPP loan and has been able to provide full salaries and benefits including health insurance coverage to all of its employees and their families."

Even with such a hefty loan amount, none of the PPP loan was used to pay pastors Joel or Victoria Olsteen, as neither of the them have received salaries from Lakewood Church since 2004.

So, I guess that's something.
 

Dis

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,953
My mother in law and sister in law used to go to this church when I first met my wife 4 years ago, my wife was always calling out the bs from it because she isn't religious, but I'm glad they both stopped going now and stopped giving them money, I just sent my wife the link to show her mum and her mum said "well 4.4 million is enough of peoples money to never need to donate to them again" hahaha seriously though fuck this dude, people like him are why my mother in laws small family business never got a PPP loan because the money ran out. Gotta love that separation of church and state, don't pay taxes but happily help themselves to the tax funded bailouts.
 

Auros01

Avenger
Nov 17, 2017
5,509
According to the article:


So, I guess that's something.

I can believe that but what I'm most perplexed by is that, with how wealthy they are, they didn't have savings or investments or whatever to get by for this first year of the pandemic.

That PPP money could've actually gone to people that needed it.
 

Deleted member 6263

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
9,387
This was also the megachurch that, IIRC, was turning people away at the door during a major storm emergency a few years ago.

I don't really have a problem churches applying for and getting relief. In cities like mine, religious groups are often the front-line for food and housing relief in emergencies, and with churches being closed around us for about half the year, fundraising dried up completely. Especially with schools closed, churches and church run food pantries were some of the only places that people could get a hot meal, take shelter for a few hours, do laundry, or get clean clothes. Ideally I think most of us would want the government to provide this relief, and in some places it does, but it usually doesn't, and so non-profits like churches often fill the gap (or provide the bulk of unmet need) and it's one of those things where your ideological purity -- "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE UBER ALLES!" -- is out of touch with the reality of people who need help and the groups helping them.

That said -- I have a problem with clearly profit-driven corporations run by eccentric multi-millionaire or billiionaires like JOel Osteen getting PPP funding.
All my thoughts exactly and then some, well said.
 

BossAttack

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,996
I can believe that but what I'm most perplexed by is that, with how wealthy they are, they didn't have savings or investments or whatever to get by for this first year of the pandemic.

That PPP money could've actually gone to people that needed it.
I mean, they are already flush with cash, grabbing up this loan money for themselves wouldn't be worth the potential pushback.

They still need to be taxed to all fuck.

The PPP money is for payroll and employee benefits. While they are personally flush with cash, why would they dip into their own personal money to pay their employees? It is a business after all, and the PPP is used to help businesses.

Honestly, I don't see much of an issue here and I'm an atheist that thinks that smiling fuck is slimy. But, if they qualify for a PPP, I don't see the issue. Either their employees get paid or they get laid off. Why should a business owner have to dip into their own personal money to pay their employees when the government is offering a lifeline?
 

take_marsh

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,279
The PPP money is for payroll and employee benefits. While they are personally flush with cash, why would they dip into their own personal money to pay their employees? It is a business after all, and the PPP is used to help businesses.

Honestly, I don't see much of an issue here and I'm an atheist that thinks that smiling fuck is slimy. But, if they qualify for a PPP, I don't see the issue. Either their employees get paid or they get laid off. Why should a business owner have to dip into their own personal money to pay their employees when the government is offering a lifeline?

The exploited workers deserve the PPP.

The higher-ups, like Osteen, deserve nothing. My reaction was more to him saying he's not taking any money from the loan. I'll typically give churches (not Scientology) the benefit of the doubt since they do sometimes provide public services and help those in need. The organizations should pay taxes though.
 

Transistor

Hollowly Brittle
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
37,164
Washington, D.C.
As a Houstonian, fuck Joel Osteen

This was also the megachurch that, IIRC, was turning people away at the door during a major storm emergency a few years ago.

I don't really have a problem churches applying for and getting relief. In cities like mine, religious groups are often the front-line for food and housing relief in emergencies, and with churches being closed around us for about half the year, fundraising dried up completely. Especially with schools closed, churches and church run food pantries were some of the only places that people could get a hot meal, take shelter for a few hours, do laundry, or get clean clothes. Ideally I think most of us would want the government to provide this relief, and in some places it does, but it usually doesn't, and so non-profits like churches often fill the gap (or provide the bulk of unmet need) and it's one of those things where your ideological purity -- "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE UBER ALLES!" -- is out of touch with the reality of people who need help and the groups helping them.

That said -- I have a problem with clearly profit-driven corporations run by eccentric multi-millionaire or billiionaires like JOel Osteen getting PPP funding.

Preach it
 

Deleted member 22750

Oct 28, 2017
13,267
giphy.gif

this is the dude that wouldn't let downing people into his megachurch right?
 

Auros01

Avenger
Nov 17, 2017
5,509
The PPP money is for payroll and employee benefits. While they are personally flush with cash, why would they dip into their own personal money to pay their employees? It is a business after all, and the PPP is used to help businesses.

Honestly, I don't see much of an issue here and I'm an atheist that thinks that smiling fuck is slimy. But, if they qualify for a PPP, I don't see the issue. Either their employees get paid or they get laid off. Why should a business owner have to dip into their own personal money to pay their employees when the government is offering a lifeline?

Woops. I misread the article. I thought it said that the Osteen's payed themselves using the PPP funds. Nevermind.
 

Book One

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,821
The PPP money is for payroll and employee benefits. While they are personally flush with cash, why would they dip into their own personal money to pay their employees? It is a business after all, and the PPP is used to help businesses.

Honestly, I don't see much of an issue here and I'm an atheist that thinks that smiling fuck is slimy. But, if they qualify for a PPP, I don't see the issue. Either their employees get paid or they get laid off. Why should a business owner have to dip into their own personal money to pay their employees when the government is offering a lifeline?


if it's a business it should be taxed

all the tax paying businesses that don't have an owner with a net worth of 60 million dollars and yearly contributions of 80 million dollars also have payroll and employees and have to scramble and get denied or delayed that PPP money while places like Lakewood get to grab another piece of the pie.

This was also the megachurch that, IIRC, was turning people away at the door during a major storm emergency a few years ago.

I don't really have a problem churches applying for and getting relief. In cities like mine, religious groups are often the front-line for food and housing relief in emergencies, and with churches being closed around us for about half the year, fundraising dried up completely. Especially with schools closed, churches and church run food pantries were some of the only places that people could get a hot meal, take shelter for a few hours, do laundry, or get clean clothes. Ideally I think most of us would want the government to provide this relief, and in some places it does, but it usually doesn't, and so non-profits like churches often fill the gap (or provide the bulk of unmet need) and it's one of those things where your ideological purity -- "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE UBER ALLES!" -- is out of touch with the reality of people who need help and the groups helping them.

That said -- I have a problem with clearly profit-driven corporations run by eccentric multi-millionaire or billiionaires like JOel Osteen getting PPP funding.


yup.

Lakewood is a massive corporation at this point.
 

BossAttack

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,996
if it's a business it should be taxed

all the tax paying businesses that don't have an owner with a net worth of 60 million dollars and yearly contributions of 80 million dollars also have payroll and employees and have to scramble and get denied or delayed that PPP money while places like Lakewood get to grab another piece of the pie.

Well, technically it's a "faith based organization." Listen, you're preaching to the choir about churches being taxed. But that's a separate subject. They qualify for the loan as a faith based organization, why would I be upset for them applying for a loan to pay their employees which they qualify for?
 

APOEERA

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,065
If Lakewood Church got the grant and said they didn't apply, they lied.

According to the Bible Joel Osteen espouses, when you lie to another person, you lie to God.

It's despicable that they got the loan but if they told the truth, it would have been more accurate.