Not backseat moderating in any way, shape, or form here, but these posts are examples of how not to make good arguments in your favor or viewpoint.
1: There 100% are sensitive documents in the Delaware archives. Most of those will be something along the lines of "here's behind the scenes documents on how we made this event, this legislation, whatever, happen". They affect much more than just Joe Biden. They will be released in the future, as per norm. What is almost assuredly not there is documentation about that time he allegedly sexually assaulted a staff member. That doesn't make sense from a preservation standpoint, from a cover-up standpoint, from any standpoint. Calls to go to the Delaware archive from a lot of people seem more like an opposition fishing expedition than a serious attempt to uncover information about this specific event.
2: The "hand-picked library" he made the calls to open is the one that would have anything like this in it. Biden has no control over what they would find in there or how it is presented.
3: Joe Biden has physical disabilities that affect the way he speaks sometimes. This is a known fact and has come up more than once throughout his career. That is a horrific take on determining someone's guilt or innocence, and is a fucked up thing to do, whether these allegations are true or not.
4: It's perfectly okay to not like Joe Biden, to disagree with him, or even to want more information with regards to these allegations against him. But these arguments I quote ain't the right way to go about ANY of this.
