We need Bones to do something. How about surgery on a torpedo?
Good enough.
Bones does surgery on a torpedo in the climax of Star Trek 6, so even that wasn't original.
We need Bones to do something. How about surgery on a torpedo?
Good enough.
I haven't read all the comics, so I probably missed a few things, but here's some stuff I recall:
Probably something like "Leia and Han's son is ruling the empire now. In the last movie, Leia turns him back to the light side."
Lucas stopped the OT because he worried about the logistics of doing more films. And his fears were quite valid.
It's a tragedy that his original treatment for the ST was thrown out. While throwing out Mr. Prequels' next works at the time not seeming like the worst idea, it turns out not having anything is even worse, as it shows. I wish Lucas could have done Episode 8. Or anyone competent.
You can sum up the plot of Empire Strikes back in like 5 sentences. That doesn't mean shit.TLJ does an opening crawl worth of plot. I can watch the good bits on Youtube in between 7 and 9.
Translate Klingon and fight with Spock about their relationship.
Those films may feel complete thematically, but in terms of elements that are supposed to continue from one film to the next, like the arcs of the characters, they work together less cleanly. They work more to serve the narrative of the film than an overall arc across the trilogy.The funny part is people keep citing the Nolan Batman films as an example of "YOU DON'T NEED A PLAN"
But what they miss about those movies was that they weren't telling one single continuous story. Every Nolan Batfilm was positioned as if it could've been the LAST one in the series, so they always ended with closure and a completed narrative arc.
The Dark Knight trilogy wasn't a pre-planned trilogy, it was just three movies and then Nolan was finished. That's the difference.
Those films may feel complete thematically, but in terms of elements that are supposed to continue from one film to the next, like the arcs of the characters, they work together less cleanly. They work more to serve the narrative of the film than an overall arc across the trilogy.
Except for all the character development and major events events that set up the premise of the final film but guys keep posting poorly thought out hot takes. REALLY makes it apparent who to take seriously when it comes to film criticism.Pretend Luke is a force ghost in TFA and you are literally missing nothing.
Except for all the character development and major events events that set up the premise of the final film but guys keep posting poorly thought out hot takes. REALLY makes it apparent who to take seriously when it comes to film criticism.
This some grade B Star Wars shit that should have been in part 2 of 3 when part 1 did nothing special.
I haven't read all the comics, so I probably missed a few things, but here's some stuff I recall:
Prior to death shenanigans:
Post humous shenanigans:
- During the events of Star Wars: Rebels Palpatine was attempting to gain entry into the 'world between worlds' – something like the Black Lodge - a realm that exists beyond spacetime.
- Palpatine set up observatories and labs in the unknown regions (space Bermuda Triangle); his motivations being related to sensing some source of dark side power being 'out there'.
- Palpatine invested in secretive research operations into force-related artefacts.
- Palpatine visited Jakku and thought it was of some significance.
- After his death, special droids bearing the face of Palpatine issued a variety of peculiar and specific orders to high-command Imperials.
- Operation Cinder was a posthumous contingency to destroy 'traitorous' Imperial remnants and victorious Rebels.
- The plan was to eventually draw everyone to Jakku, and then explode the planet, leaving a power vacuum for his 'pure' chosen few to assume control of the galaxy.
- As this failed, another contingency provided an escape for his 'chosen few' to flee to the unknown regions following a a secret hyperspace route calculated by Palpatine's research observatories.
- These select few set up the 'First Order'.
- Spoilers for Fallen Order
One planet of interest in the Unkown regions was Ilum: the plaet where Jedi took their kyber crystals. During the reign of the Empire it was strip mined for the creation of the Death Stars. The First Order continued this work to convert the planet into StarKiller Base.- There is some significance given to the Emperor's flagship the Eclipse which was saved from the fate of many other SSDs, and was waiting for the First Order in the Unknown Regions.
- An observatory in Pillio had a 'compass' that helps navigate the 'unkown' regions. Luke Skywalker took this compass in the SWBF2 campaign. It may be seen in the background in Luke's hut in TLJ.
TL:DR The Emperor had a big contingency plan for 'the brightest and best' Imperials to succeed the Empire (The First Order). He was obsessed with the 'unknown regions' and force-related artefacts. It is suggestive that there has been some other contingency we don't know about.
Palpatine having some kind of contingency has been telegraphed by the new canon since the first few books that came out with TFA, of course there was some sort of plan.
Watch the movie./ Kids get it so i'm sure an adult can glean what are very easily readable character arcs.
So you're just a sexist got it. 👍Rey goes from being a questionable Mary Sue into being an Absolute Mary Sue*
When I think of side characters, I think of characters that, if taken out of the film, would lead to the entire climax of the film being completely different.
So you don't know how to read character arcs or metaphors got it.Poe goes from hotshot pilot guy to learning how to always follow orders
Out of all of the main characters Kylo literally gets the least amount of character development in TLJ and that's by design because his "let's start something NEW" speech included this:Kylo gets some character development, but the script makes sure he goes from edgy sith lord to maybe not...nope, back to edgy sith lord.
Not answering fan theories with specific answers that they wanted does not=erasing plot questions.
Resistance is packing up trying to get away from their base on D'Qar. Direct continuation from TFA where, if you don't recall, Starkiller base was charging up to fire on the Resistance base. FO knew where they were. FO forces were not concentrated at Starkiller base, and it's destruction did not destroy the FO ability to swiftly enter into the galaxy conquering mode.
Finn wakes up from coma, shouting REY, first thing he asks anyone he recognizes, 'Where's Rey?' Direct continuation of his attitude and mission from TFA. If you don't recall, he told Han he specifically came to Starkiller to get Rey.
Luke and Rey on Ach-To, don't know how you can miss the direct continuation there.
Snoke and Kylo. end of TFA, Snoke orders Hux to bring Kylo to him so he can complete his training. Direct continuation, where Snoke berates Kylo for his failure to take out Rey.
They surely can be taken more seriously than people who apparently read headlines from sketchy places and then just repeat them verbatim... 👀You're right about Film Criticism though. Anybody who thinks this is the best Star Wars movie can't be taken seriously.
Not surprised by the reactions here, but often, when I'm writing, I'll have a general idea of where my story is going. Like, I know where I want to go, but I tend to keep the particulars fairly vague, and let the actual minutiae happen as I write.
Wow, thanks for this, dude! Always good to learn a new process!Not surprised by the reactions here, but often, when I'm writing, I'll have a general idea of where my story is going. Like, I know where I want to go, but I tend to keep the particulars fairly vague, and let the actual minutiae happen as I write.
Then in subsequent rewrites I tighten it and tighten it. Writing a story isn't always like a crime show, where you have a wall of post it notes with string connecting everything together.
A lot of the fun of writing is letting the characters and story surprise you. Some unpredictability. I have no doubt that going into this trilogy, the team at Lucasfilm knew where they wanted the characters to end up at the conclusion, but they let the individual film teams handle the point to point of how they get there.
Some writers are meticulous, sure, and have insanely detailed plot outlines, covering every single moment of the story.
My work flow is usually like this:
1. World building. I'll spend a ton of time here, setting the groundwork for what the backdrop of my story is. Once I feel like my world has enough meat on its bones, I'll work on fleshing out my primary cast of characters.
2. Plot outline1. This is really broad. Something like this: A, K, Z. I sketch out a rough outline of my beginning, middle, and end.
3. Plot outline 2. Now that the skeleton of the story is established, I start to flesh it out some mire: A, E, H, K, R, U, Z. This would be a more scene to scene outline. Some key moments/sequences that I really want to have in the story. Sometimes I'll write them in mire detail, and they'll get shuffled around during final plotting.
4. Plot outline 3. Probably my final plot outline, and is even more detailed than the 2nd: A, B, C, E, H, J, K, Q, R, S, U, X, Y, Z. I still don't have every detail mapped out, but usually by this point I have enough to go on to move to scriptwriting.
5. The actual writing of the script/story. Taking all of my detailed plot and then adding all of the detail that fleshes out a story. Sometimes things I put in my plot outline get completely scrapped because the story/characters take a turn as I'm writing it. I actually enjoy that part XD. Then I rewrite and rewrite and rewrite until the story isin a spot where I'm happy with it and can say it's complete.
Thinking that the Lucasfilm creative team behind the new trilogy was just completely winging it without at least a broad idea of where they wanted the trilogy to end is just foolish confirmation bias. They left enough room for the filmmakers to tell the story they wanted to tell, but the backbone of the story, that A, K, and Z? No doubt that's been there since the beginning. The how, is the part that the screenwriters and directors had complete freedom to do with as they please. I do think that Carrie Fisher's unexpected passing messed with their plans, and they were forced to adapt, but I think the trilogy is still ending where they wanted it to end.
I don't care if they had a plan or not. Nolan didn't have a plan when he made the The Dark Knight trilogy. Just make good movies with good stories. People are totally exaggerating the inconsistencies here. Also, best to wait for the third movie to see how it all gels together. All signs point to TROS being very much a sequel to TLJ.
What's funny about the Mary Sue complaint is that she...kind of fails at being a Mary Sue. Like, aren't Mary Sue's supposed to easily get what they want? She botches redeeming Kylo Ren. She botches convincing Luke to help her save the day (that's Yoda that does that). Like in the grand scheme of the movie, her one achievement is...lifting some rocks...
Nolan was the intended auteur behind the whole trilogy, there's a difference there. This Star Wars stuff is a lot more messy and was originally supposed to be three separate directors, so I think the plan criticism works here.
Because to argue that Rey is a mary sue is to not only micro analyze literally every single thing she does, but also requires one to outright ignore the multiple times she fails, gets into a situation she can't get out of or struggles to get out of, on top of how her backstory affects her character. Frankly, there's been way more SHOWING why she is the way she is compared to Luke getting lines of exposition to justify being able to perfectly take off in a vehicle he's never flown before in space while staying in formation with a squad comprised mostly of people he's never met. Compared to Rey struggling to fly the falcon despite intimate knowledge of it's inner workings and only succeeding due to an involuntary flight or fight boost from the force. You know...as an example 👀
🍵Maybe, if anybody ever actually used the term Gary Stu as anything other than a completely hypothetical rhetorical exercise as you're doing now.
No, the plan criticism is legitimate because there wasn't supposed to be a Nolan trilogy. It was never announced at the outset such a thing would happen. Each movie was something that just happened based on the success of the last.
Star Wars was different, it was announced at the outset at the start. This is an absolute rarity in film, franchises rarely are able to just straight up say, "there will be three films, we've already got the funding and backing for all three." That pretty much never happens. So, to go in with the absolute knowledge this will be a trilogy, something not even the OT had, and then go in without any sort of grand plan is fair criticism.
The Lord of the Rings films are an adaptation of an existing storyline with literally every beat planned out, that's completely different than making a trilogy comprised of a new story. Also, the ST is essentially written and filmed back to back. TLJ was written and going into pre-production while TFA was almost done and TFA even had changes made to it to accommodate the story of TLJ.I mean... the three Lord of the Rings films were all written and filmed back to back... (it helped that they were based on a book series) Why didn't Lucasfilm do that with these films?
Disney wanted that Star Wars money ASAP.I mean... the three Lord of the Rings films were all written and filmed back to back... (it helped that they were based on a book series) Why didn't Lucasfilm do that with these films?