Well, it's currently 70€ digital / 75€ physical, which is, conversion wise, even worse than 70$/80€.
They may be big AAA titles but most of Ubisoft games come with a digital in-game storefront with plenty of timesavers/mtx's to alleviate a lot of the grind they implement into their game design.
This is why I think you will see this model improve and become a bigger touchstone in the industry. Especially as games become more expensive it will become more risky to invest in new single player IP without persistent spending or the cover of a sub service to draw heat away and shield the studios from losses
This is not the case right now, as they're asking 80€ for a remaster and cross-gen titles.
For some reason some people here seems to not understand this.
Maybe Betty fears that this model could compromise the scope and production value for games that Betty enjoys?
Absolutely true, the value you get form an opera is completely personal. And, while I understand that you're willing to pay even that price for these games since you really like them, It doesn't change the fact that thier statement is bogus.
Keep fighting the good fight. This place is super negative for no reason.
Nothing wrong with pursuing that style of game it makes financial sense at the time. The industry is constantly evolving, so we have no idea what the landscape looks like going forward.
This is not true though.
He didn't backflip the first time. You guys just heard what you wanted to hear, not what he said.
Maybe these are all ps5 only games until some people complaint about anti consumer so they added ps4 port, performance be damned, lol.
Then again, they weren't trying to build a narrative that they are only releasing ps5 games, why hide that some of their games shown in june were crossgen?
