This ain't itWhen their latest efforts of Fallout games were disasters in some way there's some cynicism involved. I hope their new tech can be better than what they've had up to now but i am no insider, and people say sufficient backing by Microsoft will be able to address this. Unless i see the improvement i am not assuming things.
That's fine i just want to know the arguments of the opposite stance, just saying it ain't so doesn't give me much i am open to all the evidence against my initial thoughts so long as you present them. People already said the long dev time and other groups in Bethesda working on it show it's gonna turn out differently. My lack of knowledge of the inner workings of Bethesda didn't give me reason to get overly enthusiastic.
People need to understand, a monthly sub is far far more valuable than selling a even 10 million copies of a couple games on playstation. The added effect of gamepass is that if it becomes people's primary system because they and their friends are both subscribers, that means all the microtransactions from all the other games they play are done through MSs store. If exclusivity isn't announced, it would be shocking
It's almost a lose-lose, situation on Era for Xbox lol. Announce tons of new games available everywhere for Bethesda, Xbox fans will be mad. Announce new games exclusively for MS platforms, PS fans are mad.
probably not worth it. they've said they're gonna honor previous commitments, and that would include having those games be exclusive to ps5 for a while.Would be cool if MS buys out the timed exclusivity for the 2 PS5 money-hats. Of course they should still release on PS5 given this option.
It's almost a lose-lose, situation on Era for Xbox lol. Announce tons of new games available everywhere for Bethesda, Xbox fans will be mad. Announce new games exclusively for MS platforms, PS fans are mad.
That's their choice to make and it's a bit disguise to assume it's just one game. Perhaps there are some RPG player, who now have to make a choice between Xbox and PS? Perhaps there are some Xbox 360 owners, who switched to PS4 and will now go to Xbox again?Expecting Playstation consumers to just SWITCH ecosystems and abandon all of their digital purchases and online friends because one game they might want got bought out seems pretty silly, don't you agree?
What? Lmao. Gamepass is the exact reasons there is need for both.If they do go exclusive I expect massive layoffs on the Bethesda publishing arm. There is no need for both especially with Gamepass
The question you should ask yourself, what gives them more money out of the two options? Clearly Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft agree exclusive do more for their business, otherwise we'd see Mario Kart, The Last of Us and Halo being on all consoles.MS gets paid for Minecraft and it's still on PlayStation. PlayStation gets paid for MLB the Show even tho it's developed by Santa Monica and releasing on Xbox now. I don't care either way, just highlighting that your view is flawed.
Yea, I've been wondering if this is a possibility. Buy out the contract and announce that they'll be releasing same day on Xbox and PS5.Would be cool if MS buys out the timed exclusivity for the 2 PS5 money-hats. Of course they should still release on PS5 given this option.
Some surely would like the twitter PS guys going on rage when Horizon Zero Dawn was announced for PC. War, war never changes.
They can honor commitments by still releasing on PS5. It would be nice for Game Pass subs to have the 2 Sony money hats on day one rather than waiting a year for no reason.probably not worth it. they've said they're gonna honor previous commitments, and that would include having those games be exclusive to ps5 for a while.
Someone obviously hasn't read any of the official Microsoft/Bethesda correspondence (no layoffs), or paid attention to the Phil/Satya continued usage of "Xbox ecosystem" when talking about the Bethesda acquisition.
You can see the console warriors foaming at the mouth for bragging rights lol
Strictly about Xbox, you're right in that Minecraft is still on PlayStation. MS has made it clear they don't close deals already in place, and believe there is value in continuing to support a game that is a service on the platforms already out and future ones.MS gets paid for Minecraft and it's still on PlayStation. PlayStation gets paid for MLB the Show even tho it's developed by Santa Monica and releasing on Xbox now. I don't care either way, just highlighting that your view is flawed.
Don't change the subject to mobile games nobody has brought up. You said Fallout 4 was a "disaster" and it very clearly wasn't. I am not assuming anything in regards to Bethesda's future titles, only highlighting how wrong you are in regards to Fallout 4 being a "disaster" of any kind.Elder Scrolls Blades has good scores on the appstore and the google play store, and i don't know how that reflects that games quality from what i've seen.
These new games shouldn't be making the same mistakes so the comparison shouldn't hold either. Arguing that these new games will be bangers without repeating mistakes would be nice, but most people say they will be a success no matter the initial quality since these are Bethesda games.
it would, but sony already moneyhatted those and promoted them as exclusive games. while i'm sure there's a price for everything and they can make it happen, i don't think it'll be worth the news articles and the fanboy over-reactions. they can just wait it out and then put them on game pass. in the meantime they can promote other games, and bring the rest of bethesda's back-catalog to the service.They can honor commitments by still releasing on PS5. It would be nice for Game Pass subs to have the 2 Sony money hats on day one rather than waiting a year for no reason.
Because Matt and his team can't oversee all those studios themselves. Xbox grown so much, they would need another team or more people anyways. So why not take the Bethesda guys, which know their studios best?Yep, just like the firm I worked for. Say no layoff and less than a year later after the merger lay offs.
If that's the case I don't see where all that publishing staff will be needed if it's only on Xbox.
Why would they need more publishing staff for Sony releases? They already do that for Minecraft without the extra staff.Yep, just like the firm I worked for. Say no layoff and less than a year later after the merger lay offs.
If that's the case I don't see where all that publishing staff will be needed if it's only on Xbox.
It's worth buying them out to keep Game Pass healthy. Also, why would Sony fans be upset that other Xbox fans get to play Xbox made games? That's a little ridiculous. Also... why would Microsoft care about this?it would, but sony already moneyhatted those and promoted them as exclusive games. while i'm sure there's a price for everything and they can make it happen, i don't think it'll be worth the news articles and the fanboy over-reactions. they can just wait it out and then put them on game-pass. in the meantime they can promote other games, and bring the rest of bethesda's back-catalog to the service.
Also MLB is a licenced game. Sony can't control what MLB wants their games to be on unless Sony want to abandon the IP completely. MS will not have that restriction with Bethesda.
Xbox is not building towards being "platform agnostic", they are building towards being hardware agnostic. Removing the platform (Xbox) from the limitations that dedicated hardware (Xbox consoles) puts on it, the same reason Spencer gave on why Xbox games on Switch wouldn't be a thing in the future (they can't put the Xbox platform on Switch.)Sony wouldn't have purchased ZeniMax in the first place as that is not their strategy and they have different goals and that doesn't involve being platform agnostic as MS envisons of Xbox. In fact, if the idea is for Xbox to be platform agnostic, why are people getting up in arms and upset as if it is taboo to mention that they might want to continue releasing games on other platforms as they already started doing?
that's just my opinion on why it won't happen, i guess we'll see. these deals don't often change, even if they technically could.It's worth buying them out to keep Game Pass healthy. Also, why would Sony fans be upset that other Xbox fans get to play Xbox made games? That's a little ridiculous. Also... why would Microsoft care about this?
When has this situation happened before?that's just my opinion on why it won't happen, i guess we'll see. these deals don't often change, even if they technically could.
It's a six year old game and people gave the initial launch problems a pass since that's what people expected.I remember people being disappointed with the simplified dialogue system and as a fallout game. Perhaps you can put that under people who also didn't like FO3 for being what it was. The most fervant fans i see keep going back to New Vegas as their favorite game. Saying that no one was disappointed is rather strong.Don't change the subject to mobile games nobody has brought up. You said Fallout 4 was a "disaster" and it very clearly wasn't. I am not assuming anything in regards to Bethesda's future titles, only highlighting how wrong you are in regards to Fallout 4 being a "disaster" of any kind.
It's worth buying them out to keep Game Pass healthy. Also, why would Sony fans be upset that other Xbox fans get to play Xbox made games? That's a little ridiculous. Also... why would Microsoft care about this?
It's almost a lose-lose, situation on Era for Xbox lol. Announce tons of new games available everywhere for Bethesda, Xbox fans will be mad. Announce new games exclusively for MS platforms, PS fans are mad.
I get that, but Deathloop was already delayed and Ghostwire is a long way out. 1 yr timed exclusivity is a long time, and MS should buy these timed windows out if they want to keep Game Pass healthy over the current drought.I wouldn't expect MS to make any changes to the deals for Ghostwire Tokyo or Desthloop. If the teams are primarily focused on PS5 development to get those games out, who knows what the state of the Xbox versions are and suddenly changing the planned consoles this close to release could negatively impact the games.
i guess it hasn't, but what i mean is when a timed-exclusivity deal is signed and announced, i don't see either party wanting to change things. specially in this case when in the grand scheme of things these two games coming a year (or is it 6 months?) later to game pass doesn't change much.
Luckily for me, I didn't say that and you are just attacking a straw man to distract from the fact you said Fallout 4 was a disaster when it wasn't.It's a six year old game and people gave the initial launch problems a pass since that's what people expected.I remember people being disappointed with the simplified dialogue system and as a fallout game. Perhaps you can put that under people who also didn't like FO3 for being what it was. The most fervant fans i see keep going back to New Vegas as their favorite game. Saying that no one was disappointed is rather strong.
Their commitment includes that PS5 would be the only place to play those games, for a while at least. Anything less is grounds for lawsuits.They can honor commitments by still releasing on PS5. It would be nice for Game Pass subs to have the 2 Sony money hats on day one rather than waiting a year for no reason.
i doubt sony would be cool with that.Is there any reason to suspect Deathloop + Ghostwire: Tokyo won't be on PC Game Pass day one?
Right, so there isn't really precedent for this situation. I'm pretty sure both titles are 1 year exclusivity, which means it could be years until Xbox fans get to play Ghostwire which is now made by an Xbox studio. I think that's a little ridiculous, and MS should at least try to buy that one out.i guess it hasn't, but what i mean is when a timed-exclusivity deal is signed and announced, i don't see either party wanting to change things. specially in this case when in the grand scheme of things these two games coming a year (or is it 6 months?) later to game pass doesn't change much.
also as bsigg said, it might be too late for them to have an xbox version ready for launch.
Probably for the same reason why PS owners would be annoyed if the next God of War game came to Xbox.
Probably for the same reason why PS owners would be annoyed if the next God of War game came to Xbox.
I mean, it's to sell gamepass not hardware. I'm sure MS would be fine selling you an Xbox Studios games on psn if Sony allowed it.Yeah, there are still people discussing if they'll be exclusive or not. I think they'll be because I don't think a company spends 7.5b buying another company to not use that in it's advantage.
If by playable you mean crashing at every turn, sure. But with their ambitions for the game and where it was in production in 2019 do not make me confident in a 2021 release.
EDIT: I should say, you're right that playable can be many things, but it was no where near being a finished product in 2019 and COVID hit in 2020 probably didn't help
Note: I'm not an insider.
That being said. In 2019 it was in active development but not very far along (As far as I'm aware their was no general QA presence assigned to it and that was by mid 2019) so active development yes, far enough to ensure a 2021 release, highly unlikely.
Is there any reason to suspect Deathloop + Ghostwire: Tokyo won't be on PC Game Pass day one?
I wouldn't expect MS to make any changes to the deals for Ghostwire Tokyo or Desthloop. If the teams are primarily focused on PS5 development to get those games out, who knows what the state of the Xbox versions are and suddenly changing the planned consoles this close to release could negatively impact the games.
Fanboys were initially mad when Quantum Break was announced for PC. But they eventually came to terms with it.
It will be the same, when people realize that not all Bethesda games will be exclusive to Xbox, something they are clearly hoping for, making banners and warring on twitter.
Fanboys are really hoping that Phil Spencer steps on the stage immediately after the completion of the acquisition saying: "When everyone plays, we all win unless you are a PlayStation gamer. That's why we cancelled the PlayStation version of Starfield and TES6. X Gon' Give It to Ya!!!"
You're not an insider, but you claim to know these things? You're contradicting yourself. Pardon me for not believing a random new user on resertera over the game director's words that the game was playable in mid-2018.