Yes, he made the announcement on Instagram, on a holiday.
Given the memes about Bezos not putting enough of a proportion of his wealth into social causes, $10B is a bit more significant.
We shouldn't have to rely on the charity of the ultra rich to save the planet.But... ERA members apparently want to kill this man (see L.A Mansion thread...)
But... ERA members apparently want to kill this man (see L.A Mansion thread...)
Exactly. When I'm as rich as Bezos, I will prefer to make sure my $$ go to proper charities/initiatives and not leave it up to the government's discretion.Good, I guess? I'd normally prefer he was being taxed appropriately, but our current government wouldn't put this tax money towards fighting climate change so this is what we'll have to settle for.
But... ERA members apparently want to kill this man (see L.A Mansion thread...)
Is the US government likely to use this revenue (which they could also borrow if they were so inclined) better than Bezos?
This is nothing, to him and to the cost that is required of us to fight this properly.
Is the US government likely to use this revenue (which they could also borrow if they were so inclined) better than Bezos?
It would be more effective for Bezos to lobby a broad wealth tax increase targeted at the billionaire class, so we could broadly address climate change at the state level. 10B is a grand gesture but personal charity is not sufficient to tackle a problem of this magnitude.
You wouldn't be the only rich person though.Exactly. When I'm as rich as Bezos, I will prefer to make sure my $$ go to proper charities/initiatives and not leave it up to the government's discretion.
Honestly if I had that kind of money, I can't imagine not saving at most like a billion for myself and using the rest for what I felt was important. Like, how does my life change going from having a billion dollars to 100 billion dollars?But... ERA members apparently want to kill this man (see L.A Mansion thread...)
I'm really impressed with you guys, multiple posts in and not one edgy guillotine or eat the rich comment
Can't complain about $10 billion towards protecting our home tbh
Is the US government likely to use this revenue (which they could also borrow if they were so inclined) better than Bezos?