Can't say I'm surprised. I know a guy who refuses to play female characters because he feels "uncomfortable".
I absolutely agree. Nobody can tell me that he didn't know what was going on inside his company especially with such an enormous amount of complaints and incidents. Yves needs to step down.He is, but most people think that "sacrificing" the management that (most likely) reports to him directly is enough.
I'll repeat myself from other thread, I don't believe for a second he wasn't privy to the horrid shit going on at that company.
I'm saying there are reasons why one thread has more activity than the other than crudely gesturing some conspiracy by the era hive mind to avoid topics of sexual harassment. All whilst ignoring that those reports about the harassment directly informs the narrow subject matter of this thread. Rather than whining why this or that thread doesn't have many posts, you could actually just...ignore it and discuss the substance of the topic and wait for people to reply? It's an Internet forum, nobody is obligated to post in threads you deem more important than others.
There were several ways that you could have made your point without diminishing discussion of the sex abuse in a story that was PRIMARILY about the sex abuse. You could have said that the other discussion is obviously more important but that this was a discussion on another aspect of Jason's story.
Instead you mocked the other discussion by making a blanket statement that this one has more meat to it and that "wow this is horrible Ubisoft is terrible!" is all anyone can say when having the other discussion. Well this is just false on it's face because both discussions could be as meaty or as vapid as you choose to make them. There is nothing inherently more affecting about this portion of Jason't story than the main one. So ya maybe go about it another way next time in your valiant defense of thread discussion. Maybe even pop into the other one and say "wow this is horrible Ubisoft is terrible!" I mean that is all there really is to say right?
There's various reasons why I said that Kassandra wasn't "tacked on" late in development like many here assumed.I assume they started or planned for one lead and then were told to add the male lead by this bellend later on
Maybe Crossing Eden knows as he seems really insightful when it comes to the design choices and development processes at Ubisoft
Same. Just canceled my uPlay+.I'm so done buying Ubisoft games until true change is made in the company lol
Wow some of the things described in that article are horrifying. How on earth was stuff just allowed to continue like this? Unbelievable
When you have a thread critical of Ubisoft and certain prolific posters are not participating you know it's something truly indefensible
One former Ubisoft employee says they wrote an email to the CEO some years ago about problems with François. Not long after, François was promoted.
Or instead of appeasing the fragile male players, just have female protagonists period with no male option. That would be a step forward.I'm glad they let us choose between two protagonists in that game because it starts a trend where we'll always have a female option in the series going forward.
Are you planning to say or address anything in regards to the complaints made or is this really the only thing you're going to say about the whole affair?There's various reasons why I said that Kassandra wasn't "tacked on" late in development like many here assumed.
maybe because there are actually things to discuss other than "wow this is horrible Ubisoft is terrible!"
It's a real shame but sadly Ubisoft probably are right about games with female only leads not selling. Or certainly not selling as well as if a male was the lead
No they're not.It's a real shame but sadly Ubisoft probably are right about games with female only leads not selling. Or certainly not selling as well as if a male was the lead
How do you know? We don't have an alternate world where publishers made different decisions with promoting the exact same product only with a woman instead to compare.
It's a real shame but sadly Ubisoft probably are right about games with female only leads not selling. Or certainly not selling as well as if a male was the lead
This is nothing new in the industry. Why do you think cyberpunk has the male v
on the cover?
I remember lionhead had the same problem with fable 2. They wanted a black female on the cover but Microsoft said it would never sell, so that's why you had that generic white male protagonist on the box.
I don't agree with it and to be clear, I played as Kassandra in Odyssey and adored Aloy in Horizon. I'll also be playing as the female v in cyberpunk.
All of you have mentioned TLOU2 and Horizon. True they sold huge amounts but the sad thing is they would have probably sold more if they had a male protagonist.
I mean, these things are all a result of poor decisions on their part.Ubisoft just can't seem to stay away from the fire for 5 minutes.
I need receipts for this.
This post reads like the privileged bemoaning the situation from afar summed up in " 🤷🏼♂️ ".
These are about changes that break a self fulfilling prophecy steeped in sexism.
The argument that "games with women as protagonists don't sell" was a self fulfilling prophecy formed by the "video games are for boys" mentality that led to various games with women as protagonists, outside of the horror genre in particular, not getting as many resources and/or marketing as game starring men. There are various examples of games starring women that had huge marketing campaigns and just as many dev resources as a title like uncharted, which ended up selling well. Tomb Raider, Horizon, TLOU2, etc. That same "video games are for boys" mentality isn't even the whole picture, because for decades the medium was treated as "video games are for white males first and foremost." This is arguably the first generation of video games where that has been addressed and just looking at the various press conferences for next gen consoles you can see there's generally way more games being revealed with POC and women as the leads in a large range of genres. So when an exec says, "oh that wouldn't sell." They're out of touch.
The argument that "games with women as protagonists don't sell" was a self fulfilling prophecy formed by the "video games are for boys" mentality that led to various games with women as protagonists, outside of the horror genre in particular, not getting as many resources and/or marketing as game starring men. There are various examples of games starring women that had huge marketing campaigns and just as many dev resources as a title like uncharted, which ended up selling well. Tomb Raider, Horizon, TLOU2, etc. That same "video games are for boys" mentality isn't even the whole picture, because for decades the medium was treated as "video games are for white males first and foremost." This is arguably the first generation of video games where that has been addressed and just looking at the various press conferences for next gen consoles you can see there's generally way more games being revealed with POC and women as the leads in a large range of genres.