Because God of War isn't a remake of a beloved classic that in this case will be split into parts?!
I don't get it...are all of the people making these posts just purposely being obtuse?
I don't know about that. Every time there's one of these threads, there's always some users who go "whoa, it's split in parts?"This game is so hotly anticipated I can't see how anyone would not know it's split into multiple parts.
And this lives-under-a-rock individual probably didn't play the original, so they wouldn't know the difference anyway.
This is just another scheme to get to my Black Materia, isn't it?Hey guys, what if I told you that Square-Enix is pulling a fast one on us and ALL of the original game's content is in this release?
Trust me, I'm in the game.
But they DO have plans to release the rest of the storyline remade later in a part 2 (and 3, 4, etc)?
FFVIIR is very much episodic though. It's one story told in several smaller parts. It's just on a much bigger scale, but it's the literal definition of an episodic title.
The Witcher 1 to 3 don't tell just one story but three different, with each game meeting an end that resolves the storyline proper to that game.
They have to be.I don't get it...are all of the people making these posts just purposely being obtuse?
How many people were angry that they paid to see what was advertised as an adaptation of a novel, and only ended up getting half the story?
If were counting FFVII ending at Midgar is incomplete then so is Mass Effect. Both end with what you thought was the main threat being killed only to find out there's a much larger threat out there.
I wasn't aware that God of War on PS2 also included God of War PS4 in it's entirety. Almost like those games were actual sequels and not parts of one game remade.Well then God Of War should also had "Part 1" somewhere on the boxart.
There were absolutely 100% discussions about this after E3 when it was shown that they were still just calling the first release "FF7 REMAKE"Futhermore, i think this is a stupid argument to have and none of us would be having it if Jason didn't write an article about it. i saw ZERO complaints about the "title" of the game leading up until right now.
It's a remake of final fantasy 7, that's what the title says. The game won't be a full remake though.
I feel like Era will be more mad about this than general audiences.
So now price is a factor for some reason?I see we're comparing a $10 movie remake ($20 if you count both) to what will most likely be a $200 remake game of the original FF7 story. Makes total sense.
Fuck no.
In conclusion nothing. This is more than just the first few hours of FFVII remade. Midgar isn't as short as everyone seems to be misremembering and it's already pretty clearly been added to to make a more complete part of the story. It not being outright, in your face "PART 1 OF HOWEVER MANY WE WANNA MAKE IT!" is asinine. Bitching about it when we haven't seen the back of the box to know if they are for sure not mentioning it only being part of the full experience is asinine.
When a company is purposely being misleading, they should be called out on it.Honestly, whatever. It's a full game. Midgar is expanded upon. Nothing shady. Everything is a damn problem these days
They literally think it's a real "gotcha" moment while not understanding they're using sequels in a discussion about a remake.I don't get it...are all of the people making these posts just purposely being obtuse?
I get the criticism, but I really doubt that this will be a 4 hour experience.
The sheer amount of work being put into this certainly warrants a $60 price tag. It looks magnitudes more difficult to produce than the static backgrounds approach.
You can resell used game, not used movie ticket.I see we're comparing a $10 movie remake ($20 if you count both) to what will most likely be over $200 remake game of the original FF7 story. Makes total sense.
Fuck no.
I dont care about company but semantics.Lol. People will defend anything. The last of us 2 is a sequel. This isn't the entirety of Final fantasy 7. Pretty poor comparison mate to defend your favourite company.
I just want them to adress this already. I'm so tired of these discussions lmao.
You'd have an absolutely fair argument, if it wasn't literally called "Final Fantasy VII Remake".
That's not what he meant. He meant the remake is based on 4 hours of the original game, just with extended content to be a full AAA length game.I get the criticism, but I really doubt that this will be a 4 hour experience.
The sheer amount of work being put into this certainly warrants a $60 price tag. It looks magnitudes more difficult to produce than the static backgrounds approach.
FF7 just massively opens up after the part the remake will likely end. I doubt there'll be 10 parts, 3 tops is my guess.Is it really only 1/10th of the original? I can handle trilogy but not this...
The story is finished as far as this game goes though. Stop with the original PS1 game.
Hope all future releases of Last Of Us gets Part 1 added to it or i guess it would mislead Uncle Joe of not getting the full experience.
They're straight up trolling
In conclusion nothing. This is more than just the first few hours of FFVII remade. Midgar isn't as short as everyone seems to be misremembering and it's already pretty clearly been added to to make a more complete part of the story. It not being outright, in your face "PART 1 OF HOWEVER MANY WE WANNA MAKE IT!" is asinine. Bitching about it when we haven't seen the back of the box to know if they are for sure not mentioning it only being part of the full experience is asinine.
This is not an issue.
FF7 just massively opens up after the part the remake will likely end. I doubt there'll be 10 parts, 3 tops is my guess.