I used to think I was an audiophile until I went to the convenience of Bluetooth headphones in my Bose QC35 II which I'm sure audiophiles will have an equivalent for the same or similar price that sound way better but are wired. And I know the Sony equivalents are better audio wise but I'm not spending more money until these break down and I upgrade.
Personally I kinda dig the look of the KPH30is, but yeah most of their other fare is pretty rough on the eyes.I was seriously considering getting some Koss headphones but I just couldn't get over just how damn ugly they are... I realise that's a silly reason not to get some headphones which I'm almost entirely going to be using at home but oh well.
These Grados were only £40 more than the Koss headphones though so I'm still pretty happy.
Yeah I love the shitty 90's PC beige color. I think the Porta Pros rock that look even harder though:The KPH30is being ugly is part of their appeal, because people that see them will wonder "the fuck are those cheap ass speak n spell headphones", then they try them on and get punched in the face by a soundstage that has no business being in a <$400 pair of cans, much less a THIRTY DOLLAR pair of cans.
Nice, big beefy expensive headphones are cool and all but have you ever put on a pair of Koss KPH30is?
They ruin everything. Not because they're the best sounding headphones on the market but for some library lookin ass headphones that only cost $20-30 you really start to question why you spend money on really expensive audio equipment unless you're a professional.
I'm going to ammend this post to say that I'm not one of those people who doesn't believe in spending lots of money in audio. There's totally a reason and it's valid, but I keep a pair of these next to me at all times because they do the job well enough and they really make me appreciate what has gone into them compared to my $200-600 cans.
These are the ugliest headphones ever made. They could bellow the voices of the gods themselves and I still would not put them on my head.Nice, big beefy expensive headphones are cool and all but have you ever put on a pair of Koss KPH30is?
They ruin everything. Not because they're the best sounding headphones on the market but for some library lookin ass headphones that only cost $20-30 you really start to question why you spend money on really expensive audio equipment unless you're a professional.
I'm going to ammend this post to say that I'm not one of those people who doesn't believe in spending lots of money in audio. There's totally a reason and it's valid, but I keep a pair of these next to me at all times because they do the job well enough and they really make me appreciate what has gone into them compared to my $200-600 cans.
Are these supposed to sound the same as the PortaPros?Nice, big beefy expensive headphones are cool and all but have you ever put on a pair of Koss KPH30is?
They ruin everything. Not because they're the best sounding headphones on the market but for some library lookin ass headphones that only cost $20-30 you really start to question why you spend money on really expensive audio equipment unless you're a professional.
I'm going to ammend this post to say that I'm not one of those people who doesn't believe in spending lots of money in audio. There's totally a reason and it's valid, but I keep a pair of these next to me at all times because they do the job well enough and they really make me appreciate what has gone into them compared to my $200-600 cans.
These are the ugliest headphones ever made. They could bellow the voices of the gods themselves and I still would not put them on my head.
I have an HD280 pro that I use for production. It's great but I still use my cheap ass sony buds most of the time for some reason. lol
I think my AT's cost ~$90 when I bought them, probably less. Other than a pair of Sony MDR7506 (which fell apart) I don't think I've ever owned a better pair.yea good luck. you're going to be buying $500 headphones soon enough. you're always going to be chasing that next best
I've already spent all morning looking at the GW100 wireless Grados...yea good luck. you're going to be buying $500 headphones soon enough. you're always going to be chasing that next best
listen to:Just listened to Black Magic Women by Santana - wow - the sound of an electric guitar through these things is incredible.
I've already spent all morning looking at the GW100 wireless Grados...
I really don't need them but...
listen to:
A Tear for Eddie by Ween
Europa by Santana
Cause We've Ended as Lovers by Jeff Beck
I'm going to be honest. I've compared FLAC, AAC, WAV, MP3 etc. And I can definitely tell the difference. On a blind test I got them all right. But much like people are saying about diminishing returns on audio equipment, the size of the files just isn't worth it in my opinion. Maybe my equipment just wasn't good enough though. Hard to say, for most users though I imagine at best they were in my boat which is just a mid tier pair of headphones Audio Technica ATH-M50x or Sennheiser HD 650 range. Which is probably the upper echelon for your general user. I'm not sure what level you have to reach for the value to be really apparent or if it's just personal though.I thought this was gonna be a thread about realizing the poor quality of your audio source/files.
That's probably your next epiphany.
Lossless audio, amplifiers, etc.
With all the people online saying that Grados are too bright and lacked bass I was worried that they might be a bit shit for the electro style music I quite often listen to.
Turns out I couldn't disagree more. Maybe it's just the type of electro I listen to but these things absolutely elevate it. Bass is definitely still present and they give out a kick when they need to. But it takes a slight backseat to the melodies and detail. I'm loving this.
I tried finding them in germany and its impossible. andon amazone they dont ship em to germanyNice, big beefy expensive headphones are cool and all but have you ever put on a pair of Koss KPH30is?
They ruin everything. Not because they're the best sounding headphones on the market but for some library lookin ass headphones that only cost $20-30 you really start to question why you spend money on really expensive audio equipment unless you're a professional.
I'm going to ammend this post to say that I'm not one of those people who doesn't believe in spending lots of money in audio. There's totally a reason and it's valid, but I keep a pair of these next to me at all times because they do the job well enough and they really make me appreciate what has gone into them compared to my $200-600 cans.
So to the few people mentioning better sources. Any recommendations to someone who isn't really interested in buying music and ripping it to a DAP?
I'm going to be honest. I've compared FLAC, AAC, WAV, MP3 etc. And I can definitely tell the difference. On a blind test I got them all right. But much like people are saying about diminishing returns on audio equipment, the size of the files just isn't worth it in my opinion. Maybe my equipment just wasn't good enough though. Hard to say, for most users though I imagine at best they were in my boat which is just a mid tier pair of headphones Audio Technica ATH-M50x or Sennheiser HD 650 range. Which is probably the upper echelon for your general user. I'm not sure what level you have to reach for the value to be really apparent or if it's just personal though.
I'm like this with video peripherals so I get it.
I bought the Sennheiser HD598, which led to me getting a small amp/dac and a pair of HD6xx's. It was definitely a mistake, in a great way.
I have the 598 now, my dad gave them to me after realizing he never used them. I think they're great but for some reason I was also thinking of upgrading to the 6xx. Is it a big jump?
I have a PS Sprout DAC / amp for my home PC but more frequently just use them with my phone or laptop.
Oh really?OP, just stay content with your setup and enjoy it for what it is.
Try to make sure your audio files are good bit rates (320 and above), and that alone should provide you with all you need.
Audio is absolutely a game of diminishing returns.
And it's a ludicrous game of one-upmanship, one where the only winners are those who learn to be content with their current setup.
As others have said $150-200 is the best price point for headphones.
Now good speakers are another thing...and considerably more expensive.
Remember the priority for good sound: it goes good audio source, followed by speakers/headphones, followed by proper amp, and last would be your DAC.
Oh really?
I wasn't going to bother with an amp because the headphones get plenty loud enough straight from the phone but I was under the impression that a quality DAC was quite important.
My laptop for example sounds awful in comparison to my phone - there's constant crackling - I thought a USB DAC might solve the problem.
You could try the Superlux HD 681, great sound and also extremely comfy.wait there are sub 100$ audiophile-grade cans ? can anyone recommend some widely available brands with good sound quality for this price
Nice, big beefy expensive headphones are cool and all but have you ever put on a pair of Koss KPH30is?
They ruin everything. Not because they're the best sounding headphones on the market but for some library lookin ass headphones that only cost $20-30 you really start to question why you spend money on really expensive audio equipment unless you're a professional.
I'm going to ammend this post to say that I'm not one of those people who doesn't believe in spending lots of money in audio. There's totally a reason and it's valid, but I keep a pair of these next to me at all times because they do the job well enough and they really make me appreciate what has gone into them compared to my $200-600 cans.