Not defending them, some people would buy any shit if it's about Kojima. Then again, devs and journos are pros.That's because of the sheer gullibility of people. Anyone that genuinely bought into this deserves to be made fun of.
Not defending them, some people would buy any shit if it's about Kojima. Then again, devs and journos are pros.That's because of the sheer gullibility of people. Anyone that genuinely bought into this deserves to be made fun of.
That's not true at all. And extremely toxic. These same people had all their theories proven true when the games came out. Like the Surgeon theory you reference as silly, which turned out to be true(did you not play that game?).That's because of the sheer gullibility of people. Anyone that genuinely bought into this deserves to be made fun of.
Gotta agree with Patrick here, this whole thing was just painful to watch. Some people with a lot of reach egged others on unnecessarily.
Sony need to step in on this. Having a studio with their backing pull this kind of nonsense makes them look incompetent as well.
It still makes them look bad, especially since they'll step in on cyberpunk, but not this. Everyone has been wanting Sony to try again with silent hill after the PT situation and this whole debacle is just not a good look after that.Sony isn't publishing their game, though. This literally isn't their problem.
Which makes it even weirder lol
Why would they go from TLOU2 to working with someone who has never shipped an actual game?
Or you know, they make art for dozens of different games from small indies to AAA titles, and they almost exclusively put the AAA titles on their website.And even Halo Infinite. Shows how much all this story is suspect. An incognito indie collaborating with Sony since 2015 and outsourcing their game to a studio that helped in in big AAA games.
It still makes them look bad, especially since they'll step in on cyberpunk, but not this. Everyone has been wanting Sony to try again with silent hill after the PT situation and this whole debacle is just not a good look after that.
Oh, so head transplant doctor Sergio Canavero actually was making announcements about an experimental surgical procedure as part of an elaborate ARG related to Metal Gear Solid V, and not as a doctor with over a hundred published papers who was sucked into the vortex of weird rumor based entirely on fan hot air, despite his denials and threats to sue Konami?That's not true at all. And extremely toxic. These same people had all their theories proven true when the games came out. Like the Surgeon theory you reference as silly, which turned out to be true(did you not play that game?).
There's always a meme aspect to theories(like Chico is Quiet) and there's always far fringe people like Python Snake. But pointing out coincidences and connections and having fun isn't something that deserves your toxicity.
Cyberpunk did release though, in an abysmal state counter to what has been promised.It still makes them look bad, especially since they'll step in on cyberpunk, but not this. Everyone has been wanting Sony to try again with silent hill after the PT situation and this whole debacle is just not a good look after that.
Sony can do it justice and have to see the buzz and excitement around just a rumor of the game. People are thirsty for a Silent Hill game that Sony could benefit from having on their system.Outside of people being unable to let go of internet fan theories, why would people want Sony to try again with an IP they don't own?
Silent Hill isn't Sony's responsibility, and people assuming the two have to be connected for so long, especially after everything that happened with Bokeh, just feels weird.
Sony can do it justice and have to see the buzz and excitement around just a rumor of the game. People are thirsty for a Silent Hill game that Sony could benefit from having on their system.
Why July 8th mind me asking? Rumoured PS event?
Friend, I don't even remember that theory. If I even heard it I totally don't remember.Oh, so head transplant doctor Sergio Canavero actually was making announcements about an experimental surgical procedure as part of an elaborate ARG related to Metal Gear Solid V, and not as a doctor with over a hundred published papers who was sucked into the vortex of weird rumor based entirely on fan hot air, despite his denials and threats to sue Konami?
It did not turn out to be true. You're getting two different things mixed up. People figured out the twist with the medic in MGSV immediately, but people also thought that an Italian neurosurgeon named Sergio Canavero appearing in the news for his claims about head transplants being feasible was actually all part of viral marketing for TPP; he bore a strong resemblance to the plastic surgeon at the start of TPP when you're in the hospital in Cyprus. It turned out to be nothing despite the internet going nuts over it in the same exact way. Some modeler at Konami probably just saw the guy in the news and thought "hey, a Mediterranean doctor doing experimental procedures" and used him as a visual reference, and the guy himself got upset at the idea of his likeness was being stolen and considered suing. He was in the news still claiming to be working on head transplants as of 2019.Like the Surgeon theory you reference as silly, which turned out to be true(did you not play that game?).
He tends to do that... a lot.It seems Jason is blocking everyone that reminds him he contributed to this. Not very professional.
I don't think anyone said Sony had to do it in house. Maybe have it as a third party exclusive with support from first party like Bloodborne and what PT seemed to be heading towards.And yet it's not their IP. People need to make their peace with the fact that Sony is under no onus to go around making third parties' games for them just because a couple people might like that.
We're not even getting Bloodborne 2 and Sony owns that IP. Why would they try to make a team to make a Silent Hill game for Konami?
Jason from Bloomberg?It seems Jason is blocking everyone that reminds him he contributed to this. Not very professional.
Why does it have to be their IP to want it for their system and give their system value? Why can't fans of the game want a quality pub to work out a deal for them to provide that game? I don't understand the issue other than Konami not utilizing it's wealth of IP's to their fullest.And yet it's not their IP. People need to make their peace with the fact that Sony is under no onus to go around making third parties' games for them just because a couple people might like that.
We're not even getting Bloodborne 2 and Sony owns that IP. Why would they try to make a team to make a Silent Hill game for Konami?
I don't think anyone said Sony had to do it in house. Maybe have it as a third party exclusive like what PT seed to be heading towards.
It seems Jason is blocking everyone that reminds him he contributed to this. Not very professional.
Being them, i would still sue them lol. And make a public statement and annonce a kind of "fight back for my I.P right".
Ok maybe not that hard if they are really a little studio. But enough to show other to not try that again.
I'm not US law connaisseur, but pretty sure they can for copyright/impersonating/misleading their IP.
I don't see how Sony having a franchise with a hardcore dedicated fanbase associated with their platform would be a bad thing or something to be avoided. Moves like that are part of why the ps4 did so well last gen.Silent Hills was going to be multiplatform, from everything I had heard. The DEMO was PS4-exclusive for marketing purposes, but Silent Hills was going to be on everything that could run the FOX Engine.
I don't see how Sony having a franchise with a hardcore dedicated fanbase associated with their platform would be a bad thing or something to be avoided. Moves like that are part of why the ps4 did so well last gen.
LolIt seems Jason is blocking everyone that reminds him he contributed to this. Not very professional.
Or you know, they make art for dozens of different games from small indies to AAA titles, and they almost exclusively put the AAA titles on their website.
Here's an outsourcing studio who went from games like Sekiro, Death Stranding to working on indie titles like No Straight Roads.
Work
www.passionrepublic.com
We barely understand how the front line studios work behind the scenes, let alone how small behind the scene outsourcing studios work.
Trying to make a very normal thing into a bigger deal is just going to lead to disappointment.
That makes sense I guess... And to be clear, I'm not saying "Nuare is working on this, therefore Kojima!" I just mean it doesn't make sense to me that they would participate in a scam.
Fair enough, I'm just saying that weird deals have happened before. Part of me is still hoping that Sony would do exciting left field sort of stuff like that.I don't think it's a bad thing or something to be avoided, I just don't think they see enough value in Silent Hill to go out of their way for it. If Konami chose to make another one they might try to maneuver marketing rights or timed exclusivity or whatever because that's a low-risk/high-reward kind of action, but trying to convince another company to make a game for Konami through them? Assuming all the financial/staffing/production risk for a niche horror game in an IP they have no ownership of or control over?
That just doesn't seem like Sony's style. Especially modern Sony.
Fair enough. I can see how the phrasing could be confusing.Friend, I don't even remember that theory. If I even heard it I totally don't remember.
I thought they were referencing the medic in GZ.
It still makes them look bad, especially since they'll step in on cyberpunk, but not this. Everyone has been wanting Sony to try again with silent hill after the PT situation and this whole debacle is just not a good look after that.