You know what's a bigger dick move? Getting fired/let go completely out of nowhere and having to immediately worry about whether or not you can pay rent or bills in the near-future.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Is two weeks notice necessary?
- Thread starter Deleted member 14887
- Start date
You know what's a bigger dick move? Getting fired/let go completely out of nowhere and having to immediately worry about whether or not you can pay rent or bills in the near-future.
I would never burn bridges. The world is too small nowadays. My current work requires 4 weeks notice.
Yeah, companies loooove 2 week notices when you're leaving, but if they wanna fire you? No notice. Its not fair.
4 weeks is insane. Out of curiosity, how many weeks of notice do they give you before firing you?
I once gave 6 weeks notice, when I had another job confirmed. I was willing to work it, but the bosses said get out. They still paid me in full for those 6 weeks though. They weren't going to risk legal trouble with a termination or whatever.
I've also seen people literally toss their keycard at some admin person and walk out in the middle of the day, never to be seen again. The employer remembers who was professional and who wasn't, and there's only downside for yourself to being viewed as the latter.
I've also seen people literally toss their keycard at some admin person and walk out in the middle of the day, never to be seen again. The employer remembers who was professional and who wasn't, and there's only downside for yourself to being viewed as the latter.
Incredibly lucky and every business should be this way. Whatever "notice" time is required should always go both ways.
Yes.
1. The deal with the other job can go down in those two weeks, getting an extra paycheck never hurts.
2. You don't want to burn bridges with the people you like at work.
3. Depending on your job and position, it prevents your coworkers from calling you every 5 minutes after you leave to ask you about how to do your job.
1. The deal with the other job can go down in those two weeks, getting an extra paycheck never hurts.
2. You don't want to burn bridges with the people you like at work.
3. Depending on your job and position, it prevents your coworkers from calling you every 5 minutes after you leave to ask you about how to do your job.
My experience as well with the last financial company I worked for.
If you don't want to burn bridges, I suggest giving 2 weeks or as much advance notice as you can give if it's less than that. Anything more than 2 weeks isn't necessary, though it's not really bad either.
Even if they cut you early, they can't argue you didn't give them the courtesy of advance notice.
Even if they cut you early, they can't argue you didn't give them the courtesy of advance notice.
Yeah that's common, especially if you deal with clients or sensitive data. They want the notice but immediately cut your access so you can't take any lists of clients or sensitive data. It would still look bad even if you didn't give your two weeks notice, just kind of a formality to give it and then you're out the door. Granted you still get paid for those final two weeks sometimes!
Yes always give two weeks wether you liked the job or not. As a job hirer I can tell you that I network with other job recruiters and HR specialists to get the background on perspective candidates. If it comes up that you walked out or ghosted a job that will go against you. Always be professional.
Until a few years ago, people on work permits couldn't risk their employment status changing. Officially they had 0 days, unofficially it was 10 days, to find a similar job and an employer to sponsor their work permit. Take all the stress of rent, bills, etc. and add the potential of having to suddenly leaving the country if you cannot find a similar job in a few days. The new rules have a 60 day grace period.
The US Federal Warn Act may kick in some times, and iirc CA has a stronger version of it. Basically in a mass layoff they probably have to give 60 days notice. That happened to me once. They were closing the entire location, and the relocation options to other branches weren't appealing, so I stopped going in immediately. Most other people continued to go in, even though there was no official work to do. Eventually someone complained that I was never there. The boss said, "What are we going to do? Fire him?" lol
Even if it is not 2 weeks giving advanced notice allows you to not burn bridges and at least gives you a reference.
It depends on the situation, but most cases you'll want to give at least two weeks. I've given just a one week notice before when the new place couldn't wait and it was a far, far better job than the temp work I had at the time. The agency I was leaving wasn't thrilled, but I was moving anyways so it was worth it to secure the new job.
My last employer laid off some people pretty much right after they gave notice. It was likely because the head manager was a piece of shit.
I was able to give some notice before leaving for another job. I got lucky because I know that asshole would've canned me, but her ass got canned instead. She was a terrible leader. The military doesn't simply make you a good leader.
Don't burn bridges if you can avoid it.
I was able to give some notice before leaving for another job. I got lucky because I know that asshole would've canned me, but her ass got canned instead. She was a terrible leader. The military doesn't simply make you a good leader.
Don't burn bridges if you can avoid it.
When you do give 2 weeks ve ready to be walked out. A lot of companies consider you a risk if you have certain access.
I'm Currently on a 6 month notice period which is a blessing and a curse.
If they were to make me redundant I know I've got at least 6 months pay coming my way, but on the other hand trying to get a new job would be difficult as I know they would keep me for a minimum of 3 months.
If they were to make me redundant I know I've got at least 6 months pay coming my way, but on the other hand trying to get a new job would be difficult as I know they would keep me for a minimum of 3 months.
My company did that as a first pass, but our COO actually then personally set up calls with my peers at my resume jobs.
Honestly, my thing is what advantages do you get from not giving notice? Worst case scenario is you get let go on the spot, which is literally the same as quitting with no notice. No notice is all risk, no reward.
OP
OP
The place I worked before this shut down. They brought us all in the break room to pass out our Warn notices. It was pretty surreal experience.
If I want my unused PDO I have to give a written two week notice. Otherwise, the hours are forfeited. I've currently got almost three weeks of time. So yes, it's a must if I leave this job, because they're not getting off easy.
The problem is your new employer may consider you volatile and may value you less. The worst that happens is you care less about your old job and won't carry a lot of hate towards the normal stuff they do to you because why do you care? The best is you look like a better employee to the new job building more trust.
Now, if the other company is trying to get you to leave your job faster you might have an out there. Unless this is something like McDonalds or something.
In a lot of states you can't be fired once you give notice unless you do something worthy of being fired. If they ask you not to return after giving notice a lot of times they owe you the remaining notice in pay. This can equal free vacation (unless you have vacation to negotiate with). This may be something that benefits you. Unless you talked to some of those other people that got walked out you may not know if they got this as well.
OP
OP
Ohio is an at will state. They can let me go whenever they want. After taking a step back & chilling out I've decided that whenever I secure another job I will give notice. I don't like that I have to avoid possible future repercussions. Fuck I hate capitalism.
I'm a senior level at my company, my notice period is 3 months. Presumably should I decide to leave, and they couldn't tempt me to stay, they want that lengthy transition period between me and my replacement taking over.
I would imagine they don't have to give any notice if they were firing me, same with anywhere I expect. Fired being different from made redundant of course.
As for two weeks notice? Always give it. Don't burn bridges unnecessarily, you never know when you'll need a reference, or if you're staying the same industry; people talk and reputations for unreliability get around.
Depends on the type of job, how long you've been there, whether or not you need them on your resume, etc.
I've given 2-3 weeks notice at every job because I've never been in bad standing, didn't want to sour my reputation, etc. It's a good way to build up a solid list of references.
If for some reason I totally misjudged a company that hired me into a new job, and they treated me terribly, I'd be less inclined to give notice.
Assuming you're not fired on the spot...
I've given 2-3 weeks notice at every job because I've never been in bad standing, didn't want to sour my reputation, etc. It's a good way to build up a solid list of references.
If for some reason I totally misjudged a company that hired me into a new job, and they treated me terribly, I'd be less inclined to give notice.
Assuming you're not fired on the spot...
As far as I'm concerned this is dependent on the type of employment you have. If you are permanent and you have regular hours then 2 weeks is appropriate, gives the employer a chance to replace those hours.
If you are casually employed then you can give notice on the spot unless there is a specific agreement with the employer.
If you are casually employed then you can give notice on the spot unless there is a specific agreement with the employer.
Not that insane.
In Italy 4 weeks is the minimum of a new hire, it only goes up after there.
Of course, it's both ways.
In Germany notice time usually grows with time spend at your current company.
Minimum is 4 weeks though. 3 months is normal.
These 2 weeks Americans seem to have have always seem crazy to me.
So, as annoying as it may feel you'll want to put in that two weeks so payroll has a chance to pull you off the schedule. If they pay you and you get paid every two weeks, you can be "overpaid" and you may get a lovely letter in the mail where they tell you that you owe them money.
in that case, don't. two weeks is for when you need recommendations, care about the people there, etc. if it's a place that's just going to fuck you then fuck 'em
Honestly, I'd rather this be the case. I'd imagine it would be awkward in those 2 weeks when everyone knows you are bailing. I'd rather use up my vacation, get escorted out, and then start working my next job right away.
Notice period depends on the company, country, geography. It does depend on your contract; outside of 'probation' period you usually have 4 weeks/1 month in the UK. But the more senior you are the longer it goes. I'm on three months and teetering on the 6 months notice period mark. But the good thing about seniority or in some sectors in the UK is what we call Gardening Leave. Gardening Leave is when you annouce you're planning to leave and they decide that do not want to have you for more than x period of your notice and for the rest of the time you're paid but not working; however you're also not allowed to cut it short and start a new job if it's within a competing sector or a company that has a conflict of interest with yours.
Generally I'd say go with whatever is on your contract because notice periods are often mentioned on it outside of Zero Hour Contracts (which is shite) and some state laws in the US are comparable to that. Following notice protocol is beneficial if you intend to work in the same sector or will be dealing with people from the same industries.
Generally I'd say go with whatever is on your contract because notice periods are often mentioned on it outside of Zero Hour Contracts (which is shite) and some state laws in the US are comparable to that. Following notice protocol is beneficial if you intend to work in the same sector or will be dealing with people from the same industries.
They're contacted requirements, they snuck in the additional 4 weeks into a new contact which came with a messily pay rise, and inferred she'd lose her job if she didn't sign, and she could have probably taken legal action but that's expensive and her dad's lawyer said that there was only a 50/50 chance of winning.
I would recommend doing the notice thing, unless you are in the business of becoming a loose end. In that case, prepare for the fallout and possibly ghost as a precaution.
UK here.
I have to give 4 weeks notice if I want to quit. The company also has to give me 4 weeks notice if they want to fire me.
I think that even if I was fired on the spot and they didn't want me to go back, the company would still have to give me 4 more weeks of wage.
As long as it goes both ways, I feel way more secure having 4 weeks notice rather than 2.
EDIT: Ah I just read the comment above and Garden Leave is the term I was probably looking for.
I have to give 4 weeks notice if I want to quit. The company also has to give me 4 weeks notice if they want to fire me.
I think that even if I was fired on the spot and they didn't want me to go back, the company would still have to give me 4 more weeks of wage.
As long as it goes both ways, I feel way more secure having 4 weeks notice rather than 2.
EDIT: Ah I just read the comment above and Garden Leave is the term I was probably looking for.
Last edited:
It's one month notice here in Sweden usually. That gives everyone enough time to find a potential replacement and onboard them, finish all ongoing work, wrap up the relevant paperwork, and so on.
It's very difficult to fire someone in Sweden, leaving a job is also taken more seriously.
It's very difficult to fire someone in Sweden, leaving a job is also taken more seriously.
Gotta give 2 weeks not for the sake of the job you're working but the next one you're trying to get. It's not for them it's for you to be able to have a good work history.
Paid suspension pending investigation is the route that situation would normally take.
A quick story on not giving notice. My last company laid people off, and one supervisor decided she wanted to quit. She walked in Friday, said she was done, and walked out.
Some hr related issues at her next job made her walk away, and she was left without management references from her last two jobs.
Some hr related issues at her next job made her walk away, and she was left without management references from her last two jobs.