DQ7.Dragon Quest is pretty famous for its consistency. I can't claim to be an expert on global opinion on specific DQ games, but I'm not aware of any one game being a black sheep in the way that, say, Sunshine is for Mario or DMC2 is for DMC.
I feel like I see people whine about V more often than 4, even though V is a much better game; I wasn't using forums like this when 4 released so maybe people were really negative.
Although 7 is considerably worse than other entries, i'd say 2 is the absolute worst for sure. What a piece of shit game.
I wonder if people saying "MGS" somehow forced themselves to forget that MGS4 and TPP exist. 🤔
I could've sworn that the consensus was Unwound Future was considered the peak of the series, I guess that changed? I know it made me cry as an adult which is a miserable admission.
Is that a common opinion? I guess I assumed that DQ7 was about as well liked as any other entry in the series. That is to say, some people really like it (I include myself in that number); some people like it less well; and a few put it toward or at the bottom of the pile. I never got much of a black sheep vibe in discussions about it here or at the old place. Of course I'm totally ignorant about how Japan talks about DQ7, but it was a record seller at the time.
Is that a common opinion? I guess I assumed that DQ7 was about as well liked as any other entry in the series. That is to say, some people really like it (I include myself in that number); some people like it less well; and a few put it toward or at the bottom of the pile. I never got much of a black sheep vibe in discussions about it here or at the old place. Of course I'm totally ignorant about how Japan talks about DQ7, but it was a record seller at the time.
Great pick, all of the numbered Civ games are excellent. Beyond Earth and Revolution are mediocre but they aren't mainline entries.How about Civilization? Im not that in sync with the fandom but I seem to remember them all being well liked.
My thoughts exactly. The mainline games are solid at worst.
You have quite a few people who dislike DKC3, but mostly because it had no chance in being a proper follow-up to DKC2.
Far Cry 2 is the black sheep or Far Cry 1 even (given how the series has been 3 onward)
So think Ace Attorney is regarded as somewhat consistent, even though I think most (myself included) prefer the original Trilogy.
I think if the first 10 final fantasy games were their own series it would apply.
I mean everyone agrees that 4 is the worst as it really sucked to finish it three times to get everything, like you needed to do that in order to get the upgraded versions of the enemy chips (which you could easily do in a single playthrough in the previous games) and to fully unlock the main feature (Soul Unison)Megaman Battle Network. Some games are better than others, but none of the mainline games really sucked.
I think Apollo Justice is better than the new ones, despite it having the issues you mentioned above. It's been a while since I've played DD, but it definitely had some weird plot contrivances too. I think the thing that y killed it most was how much they nerfed the investigation phases to the point that they just gave you a checklist of things to do, completely taking away the sensation of actually investigating.Apollo Justice is definitely the black sheep, no thanks to hobo Phoenix, the non-explored Apollo-Trucy siblings plot and the weirdly implemented Perry Mason system, with the juries that amount to nothing.
Nowadays, it feels like a strange intermission between the old trilogy and modern AA. It doesn't really fit either in terms of design.
You also have a few people that shit on Justice For All and Dual Destinies, but they don't really go off the rails the same way AJ does.
not connected but you can say soulsborne. Demon souls, Ds1,2,3 and bloodborne are all top quality stuff. Everyone has their favorites but all these games including their DLCs are top quality stuff
Dead souls.
I'd love to hear some die-hard Breath of Fire fans chime in.
I've only played III, IV, and Dragon Quarter, and all three are pretty solid. Dragon Quarter sticks out as the obvious candidate for being the black sheep, but I thought it was well received, despite being a huge departure. How are BoF I and II generally ranked?
And for the sake of argument, let's just ignore this travesty:
You also have a few people that shit on Justice For All and Dual Destinies, but they don't really go off the rails the same way AJ does and are otherwise consistent in terms of tone and gameplay to their "relatives".
As someone with no nostalgia for any of them, played the trilogy for the first time at the end of last year and I found 3 to be much better than 2 to be honestYou have quite a few people who dislike DKC3, but mostly because it had no chance in being a proper follow-up to DKC2.
MGS 2 is considered a black sheep. It was very much polarizing.
That or I would say if... is basically the precursor to the Persona series rather than what SMT 1 and 2 were. This isn't a bad thing, just different.Golden abyss maybe?
Ascension
IV apocalypse is controversial isn't it?
Are you forgetting that there is a certain game called Street Fighter 1 that is TRASH TIER level.I definitely agree with Street Fighter. Look how different each entry is as well, which makes it easily the best candidate for this thread. SF2 to 3 was a massive leap. Then 4 was completely different and 5 was arguably less different but still definitely and clearly its own thing. Even the Alpha series each have their own vibe going on. It's like Final Fantasy in how they're always switching it up but way more consistent. But thats a little unfair on FF cause there's more entries.