I Am Legend was worse, because the book already had an all-time great ending and they just cast it aside for a bad ending.
This. The title of the film doesn't even make sense in the context of the ending. And for most of the film to be honest.
I Am Legend was worse, because the book already had an all-time great ending and they just cast it aside for a bad ending.
I Am Legend was worse, because the book already had an all-time great ending and they just cast it aside for a bad ending.
What? The final act was great. I dont know if I have seen a movie with a better pay off. That ending, is one of my favoritesHaven't seen this yet, but I definitely felt the final act of Get Out was very weak.
I really enjoyed Will's performance but I really hated the cgi for the vampires.Best pick. Really enjoyed the movie, then the ending was so bad I never bothered watching it again. It pissed me off so hard it's still the thing I remember most about the movie.
It's more interesting to see which movies pull of the reverse of this.
Summer of 84 is a predictable, boring slog throughout that was seemingly only created to pander to the Stranger Things and It crowd, but then out of nowhere it has a really inventive third act with non-traditional ending which made me wish the rest of the movie was even half as interesting.
Like the literal guy screaming to the audience "They Say you have VISIONS, that your life flashes before your eyes that ALL YOUR DREAMS ... come true"
This too. A lot of it has to do with the fact that the threat and the characters' behaviors work as a metaphor but not in the context of the movie. It's invisible, not intangible, but this distinction is never used to the protagonist's advantage. Maybe pelt it with flour or paint if the plan was to have your friend shoot at it, yeah? Or maybe think of that before the brilliant plan of luring it into a pool lined with toasters.
Then because they wrote themselves into a corner with an apparently unstoppable force and really stupid characters, it just kinda ends.
You're actually underselling the absurdity here.The Devil Inside ends in a cliffhanger that cuts to black, says 'the mystery was never solved', then a URL pops up that leads you to a site that advertises the movie.
That's the end.
Hereditary got worse the more it became clearthat it was actually a demon and not just the mom going crazy
I wouldn't call throwing paint on it to make it easier to shoot a clever plan, more like common sense, but okay. Even the kid in that Goosebumps book was able to think up "what if I made it visible so people believed me?" as a plan. Also Nancy was limited in help because the town refused to help to cover up the vigilante murder. These ones didn't even try for outside help because of the metaphorical concept of an STD. The family in the first Conjuring didn't have to be genre savvy to come up with the plan of "can we just leave?" and the writers realized that someone would probably ask that question in that situation.It's a homage to Nancy's genius plan in Nightmare On Elm Street in pulling Freddy out of the dream into the real world.
Sometimes when you're desperate to come across as clever online it helps to stop, take a second, and realise you're talking about teenagers in a horror film who are not teenagers who watch a lot of horror films. Your average teenagers aren't aren't going to come up with some clever plan.
Yeah, the wholeHereditary got worse the more it became clearthat it was actually a demon and not just the mom going crazy
It was definitely unoriginal but it was the execution of it that made it good.Yeah, the whole
thing is kinda played outGrandma's a satanist
One was a decent movie about an asshole hero learning redemption and caring about people thanks to his relationship with his agent
Book ending wouldn't have really made sense with the rest of the movie, though, since it showed little indication that the vampires are anything more than feral.I Am Legend was worse, because the book already had an all-time great ending and they just cast it aside for a bad ending.
From your other posts you seem to be referring to the moment you realise it's a vampire movie. Which is by no means the last act.
They're not even vampires just zombie mutants or whateverBook ending wouldn't have really made sense with the rest of the movie, though, since it showed little indication that the vampires are anything more than feral.
Book ending wouldn't have really made sense with the rest of the movie, though, since it showed little indication that the vampires are anything more than feral.
There's a psychological thriller/horror film called Pet which released some years ago which if not for the ending I would have regarded in the same breath as Alien/T1/Carpenter's The Thing.
It was that close to being perfect.
He goes back to his wife and she is basically already pregnant. You know, the act of getting a new son.The 'all your dreams' part is a central problem with this interpretation that leads to it falling apart.
If we assume the dream theory is true, then Anderton should find his son alive or at the very least what happened to him.
Anderton doesn't, which means that not all his dreams come true and so what the guard says is unreliable.
But the reason we have to believe the dream theory is accepting that what the guard says is reliable and that the 'happy' ending is dreams coming true.
So, accepting the dream theory requires us to deny that the evidence for the dream theory is reliable.
This is absurd, and so we should reject the dream theory.
You don't remember Scullibundo's post on the double ending.
It's great when you look at it that way.
Insiduous.
When the ghost hunters come in, it feels like the cast members of a completely different movie (a goofier one), comes in.
Came to post this.
I Am Legend was worse, because the book already had an all-time great ending and they just cast it aside for a bad ending.