• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
The term is valid it's just over used a lot now. Writers now use it to describe a mindset and not necessarily a class position with in capitalism. It would've been a better thread if OP spent their post explaining how the term is used now versus how it was intended to be used by the person who coined it.
 
Last edited:

Toxi

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
17,547
Most of the world isn't a simple hypothetical factory, so who's PMC and who isn't gets way murkier, which is why there's plenty of socialist discussion about how to usefully define who falls into PMC and what behaviors are useful to have PMC as a model to explain. This is a good piece that shows how socialists argue about applying the term, if you'd like to read more.
Glad to know that teachers still have zero respect from both the left and right.
 

Icolin

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,235
Midgar
OPs point rings true for me because you've got people who are looking down at the "Professional Managerial Class" while they're begging their listeners to buy MyPillow and use the offer code EatTheRich, that's offer code EatTheRich for the best sleep of your life, MyPillow.com slash EatTheRich -- Guaranteed The Most Comfortable Pillow You'll Ever Own!®

When the revolution eventually comes, it's the podcasters who will be eaten first.

lmao this is so weird
 

Fhtagn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,615
It's also used to decry warren supporters because they're "elitist college employees" or "PMC"

So what?

Is the point here that all socialists should be nice to everyone? Cuz, that's a bigger ask than socialism itself.

I personally have seen hateful shit from supporters of every major candidate this cycle, Warren fans included, so it's gonna be a stretch to get me, a member of the PMC who supported Sanders to care if people are using PMC as an insult. They are either hypocrites or are legitimately aggrieved and I can't do much about the former and I'm doing my best to alleviate the latter and if it helps someone legitimately aggrieved feel better for a moment to use PMC as an insult, well, it doesn't hurt me much.
 

The Albatross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,981
"His conclusion was that Bernie's and Corbyn's losses and people criticizing him on social media means the left is more fractured than any time post Berlin Wall"

This is an interesting thought... I don't know if it's right or not, I haven't really thought about it. Most people who know the bull shit I write here know I'm not really a leftist by the ideologically pure definition, I'm more a filthy liberal, but to me the moment we're in now seems like the strongest moment for Leftists in Europe and the Americans since the fall of the Berlin Wall. I think with that rise probably comes some fracturing, because leftist social/political/economic ideas are actually being entertained... so with it you've got competition for prominence. I don't know if it's a bad thing for the true ideological left to be fractured, it might be part of becoming prominent again.
 

Icolin

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,235
Midgar

re: socialist podcasters who make good money

4vyjqb0csgu41.jpg



class traitors are good
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
FYI, this post isn't a rebuke of your point, but a musing on when people refer to someone else's job as "worthless" or "useless" or w/e.

I think one person's definition of "a worthless job" is very different than another person's definition of "a worthless job," and that a lot of people would come to that conclusion just because they don't really know what other people do, so they just sort of assume it's worthless.
I just use it as short hand. Obviously not every job is "essential", the fact that some jobs have been kept going despite the risks of infection is proof of this. As much as we might pretend otherwise, there is a hierarchy of "essentialness" of jobs, with some jobs being more "essential" than others and times of crisis usually reveals the implicit hierarchy we take for granted in times of prosperity.

I think we could try to come up with some, but if we think critically about them, we can find that they have some worth to someone otherwise the accident of history that created those jobs probably wouldn't have happened.
This is too "the market knows best" for me. I'm sure anyone can come up with an argument for the "worth" of this or that profession but times of great stress reveals fiction for what it is. I'm more interested in underlying reasoning than fictive surface level justifications. If your society is literally collapsing for want of, say, food stockers, then surely that's evidence enough that people who stock shelves with food are "worth" more than, say, marketing people.

Similarly there's a kind of circularity if you try to gauge the "worth" of a profession using market-derived arguments. Historically, bankers are seen as useless, but they have actually been very useful in this crisis in providing emergency liquidity, but the only reason liquidity is necessary is because market capitalism needs financial liquidity. You need an institution to manage the chain of credit from retailers to consumer-renters, renters to landlord, landlord to bank, etc. The state can do this but its in our legal system that the state is not allowed to do this so the state employs banks as a proxy to provide liquidity to the consumerism chain. This doesn't make the chain "essential", it just means we've created a bloated, fiscal ouroboros we're too dependant on to live without, like a symbiote. What's "essential" is food, water, shelter, various other things you need to stay alive and find fulfillment.
 

Froyo Love

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,503
Glad to know that teachers still have zero respect from both the left and right.
Odd take given the linked piece.
Assignment or belief in oneself or someone else as part of a class with systematically defined relationships with other classes is not a moral judgment. To say architects have authority over estimators and laborers, to say teachers have the same over paraprofessionals and students, to say fashion designers have remote but real authority over garment producers—or to recognize one's own institutional authority in any of the first three occupations—is not to say "bad" architect, "bad" teacher, or "bad" designer. It is simply to acknowledge the very real—even if beneficial or benevolent—power asymmetries between such groups.

Both the working class and the PMC have beef with capital: the former vis-à-vis surplus extraction and state repression, the latter vis-à-vis salary, autonomy and ability to serve the long-term interests of their clients. Teachers in Chicago, West Virginia and L.A., while acknowledging their relative empowerment over working-class students and communities, have fought militant successful strikes in recent years for those students' interests, as well as their own.
 

Toxi

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
17,547
it's less a case of zero respect then it is recognition of the role that teachers play in the social reproduction of capitalist society. Or at least that's the left crittque.
This is akin to saying factory workers and coal miners reproduce capitalist society through the products they produce being used to support other capitalist ventures.

But of course teachers are still respected by the left. It's not like there are historical examples of them getting fucking murdered by leftist revolutions. They should have blind faith in the same people othering them.
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,899
Ontario
This is akin to saying factory workers and coal miners reproduce capitalist society through the products they produce being used to support other capitalist ventures.

But of course teachers are still respected by the left. It's not like there are historical examples of them getting fucking murdered by leftist revolutions.
are you talking about the khmer rouge? like if you want to lump them in with jacobin then idk what to say.

And no it's not the same, knowledge production is a distinct for of production that as a different functional role in capitalist society. If you read the excerpt posted it would clarify that it's not about saying bad teach as much as it is recognizing where the profession fits into the functioning and maintenance (material or ideological) in society. This isn't exclusive to capitalist society, Knowledge production has been treated as a distinct class in pre-capitalist society.
 
OP
OP
ItWasMeantToBe19
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
This is akin to saying factory workers and coal miners reproduce capitalist society through the products they produce being used to support other capitalist ventures.

But of course teachers are still respected by the left. It's not like there are historical examples of them getting fucking murdered by leftist revolutions. They should have blind faith in the same people othering them.

Folks, was Thatcher crushing the coal miner's union the greatest moment for the left in the last 50 years? Many people are saying this. After all, they keep a very destructive part of capitalism (and the world as a whole) alive.
 
OP
OP
ItWasMeantToBe19
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
Is this sarcasm?
I can't tell because breaking the power of labour is considered bad thing for the left so idk i think you are confused.

I'm sarcastically continuing the point made by the other poster that coal miners do a job that is very good for the rich and very bad for the world and from that perspective, Thatcher crushing coal miners could be praised.
 

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623
Glad to know that teachers still have zero respect from both the left and right.

I mean sure I personally would not consider teachers slotting into the PMC so neatly in general (especially because for grade-school teachers their place in that community is fraught given that for about a quarter of the year they have to take jobs that are typically menial). But they do serve a different rung on the heirarchy of needs than the people who work as, say, short-order cooks or farmhands, and that's where the whole value theory of labor thing comes in for the distinction.

I think they fundamentally fit a different role in society than, say, some kind of copyright lawyer who exists mostly to protect some megacorp's intellectual property holdings because they still serve the public. For me squaring the circle comes in the matter of the teachers rarely being able to set their own curriculum and the people who are setting curricula for, say, history courses that fail to address the consequences of US imperialism are certainly working as very explicit tools in the machinations of capitalism preserving itself.
 

Mekanos

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 17, 2018
44,124
I'm sarcastically continuing the point made by the other poster that coal miners do a job that is very good for the rich and very bad for the world and from that perspective, Thatcher crushing coal miners could be praised.

Leftists don't view crushing labor as a good thing. Coal production doesn't stop because there are no unions.

The short term goal is to unionize workers for better benefits and quality of life.

The long term goal is to transition to better energy sources and train those workers for that type of work.
 

Deleted member 22901

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
240
Folks, was Thatcher crushing the coal miner's union the greatest moment for the left in the last 50 years? Many people are saying this. After all, they keep a very destructive part of capitalism (and the world as a whole) alive.
you're now making fun of a position you've completely made up. this is such a huge misreading of their point about teachers that i'm not sure if you even care about having a discussion or if you just want to mock leftists.
 

The Albatross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,981
I just use it as short hand. Obviously not every job is "essential", the fact that some jobs have been kept going despite the risks of infection is proof of this. As much as we might pretend otherwise, there is a hierarchy of "essentialness" of jobs, with some jobs being more "essential" than others and times of crisis usually reveals the implicit hierarchy we take for granted in times of prosperity.

I think that a heirarchy of essentialness sort of leads to my thought about "the market knows best," like, we we create this heirarchy of worth in our work even when we don't want to, it leads to this sort of valuation table. And I totally recognize that my conclusion was coming too close to "the market knows best," but short of like ... a straight up Soros-like conspiracy, I'm struggling to come up with justifications for why the "Worthless" job would exist, unless there was some worth. I think you see this sort of thinking in the Conservative "work theory" or "worth theory" too, it's all over Ayn Rand... Like the ultimate parasites for Rand aren't the workers or the poor, they're the professional managers who gladhand and smile their way through business, thinking that something is owed to them. I'm not Randian, I think Atlas Shrugged is flawed (although I did finally listen all the way through 5 years ago, after spending like 10 years of college/post-grad criticizing it without having actually read it), but I think the value of work or the worth of work heirarchy, where some job is at the bottom of that heirarchy and inevitably it's some 'managerial class' of jobs, is as Randian a concept as it is social/economically egalitarian or leftist.
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,899
Ontario
I'm sarcastically continuing the point made by the other poster that coal miners do a job that is very good for the rich and very bad for the world and from that perspective, Thatcher crushing coal miners could be praised.
no because it didn't stop coal, coal production went back up after the strike and declined mostly on the basis of a glut of cheap overseas oil and coal from emerging markers.
the left is very pro the unionization of energy workers because #1 they're one of the most important nodes for labour power (which was a big reason behind the interwar push for oil over coal) and because the extraction was happening anyway.
Not to mention it has very little to do with the education analogy because extraction and knowledge production are different things.

It's really not as good as of a take as you think it is.
 

Toxi

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
17,547
are you talking about the khmer rouge? like if you want to lump them in with jacobin then idk what to say.
Why would you assume I was talking specifically about the Khmer Rouge? Shit happened elsewhere too.

And yes, they shouldn't be lumped in, but maybe it would be more reassuring for teachers if the same people trying to tell them they'll be fine were not also taking every opportunity to highlight them specifically as agents of the oppressive capitalist system.

And no it's not the same, knowledge production is a distinct for of production that as a different functional role in capitalist society. If you read the excerpt posted it would clarify that it's not about saying bad teach as much as it is recognizing where the profession fits into the functioning and maintenance (material or ideological) in society. This isn't exclusive to capitalist society, Knowledge production has been treated as a distinct class in pre-capitalist society.
It's a purely functional description if, you know, you ignore the context of every screed against the people under that description.
 

Froyo Love

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,503
This is akin to saying factory workers and coal miners reproduce capitalist society through the products they produce being used to support other capitalist ventures.

But of course teachers are still respected by the left. It's not like there are historical examples of them getting fucking murdered by leftist revolutions. They should have blind faith in the same people othering them.
did you know that teachers can also be leftist and are in fact murdered for being so

do you think the most respectful treatment of teachers is to use them in this rhetorical fashion that clearly has fuck-all to do with with a piece discussing their complex class role
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
I'm struggling to come up with justifications for why the "Worthless" job would exist, unless there was some worth.
I squared this circle like thus:

"Value" in the fabric of society does not necessarily correlate with "price" in the market. "Essential" jobs are necessary for civilization to function at all, these have "worth". Any job that can be just paused was probably not very valuable in the first place even if they were paid richly. So, for example, if you're in software, you still need a bunch of devs to maintain the server farms and the cloud codebase, whatever, because these are part of the infrastructure of normal society, like roads and plumbing, but you probably don't need a lot of marketing folk right now.

Deep down, on some level, we know that some jobs are "worth" more than others which is why society flipped to the "essential" economy on a dime. However, when times are good, we like to pretend that we need legions of advertising people because no one wants to be the one that breaks the collective illusion, or no one feels like they get anything out of going against the trend. Its a lot easier for people to maintain the charade of civilization than to disrupt it.

I guess, in sum, what I mean is "the market may not know best but society does, in aggregate, indeed society defines what 'best' is", the only conclusion to be derived here is that the market is not society. One can be a proxy for the other but they merely have the appearance of being correlated systems.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623
I think that a heirarchy of essentialness sort of leads to my thought about "the market knows best," like, we we create this heirarchy of worth in our work even when we don't want to, it leads to this sort of valuation table.

I mean the reason that people still work in restaurants and janitorial or sanitation companies is that without those jobs people literally die. People will not die as a direct result of the Playstation 5 production being indefinitely halted -- outside of the wage the manufacturing jobs would provide for workers. The thing about the valuation table as it exists in society is that it rarely prioritizes compensation for work on its value to society; capitalists set the wages, and so jobs are set in a hierarchy based on their value to the capitalists.
 

Toxi

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
17,547
I mean sure I personally would not consider teachers slotting into the PMC so neatly in general (especially because for grade-school teachers their place in that community is fraught given that for about a quarter of the year they have to take jobs that are typically menial). But they do serve a different rung on the heirarchy of needs than the people who work as, say, short-order cooks or farmhands, and that's where the whole value theory of labor thing comes in for the distinction.

I think they fundamentally fit a different role in society than, say, some kind of copyright lawyer who exists mostly to protect some megacorp's intellectual property holdings because they still serve the public. For me squaring the circle comes in the matter of the teachers rarely being able to set their own curriculum and the people who are setting curricula for, say, history courses that fail to address the consequences of US imperialism are certainly working as very explicit tools in the machinations of capitalism preserving itself.
That's the thing. Public school teachers do not have significant agency in what they teach. Why is this somehow different from the factory worker printing the textbooks full of garbage or the driver bringing them to the shop for distribution?

did you know that teachers can also be leftist and are in fact murdered for being so
Yes, it's why I said they get no respect from both the left and the right. I'm from a country that murdered them by the boatload under a rightwing dictatorship, jackass.

And it kinda rubs me the wrong way that when I wonder about the role of teachers in a system of thought that seemingly minimizes their worth, you immediately retort with "But the capitalists do it too!"
 
Last edited:

Froyo Love

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,503
That's the thing. Public school teachers do not have significant agency in what they teach. Why is this somehow different from the factory worker printing the textbooks full of garbage or the driver bringing them to the shop for distribution?


Yes, it's why I said they get no respect from both the left and the right. I'm from a country that murdered them by the boatload under a rightwing dictatorship, jackass.
then I would politely suggest you stop being a jackass and respect teachers enough not to use their murders as a rhetorical cudgel against politics you don't like

talking about why teachers are not the same as manual laborers is not a slippery slope to a violent purge
 
OP
OP
ItWasMeantToBe19
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
I squared this circle like thus:

"Value" in the fabric of society does not necessarily correlate with "price" in the market. "Essential" jobs are necessary for civilization to function at all, these have "worth". Any job that can be just paused was probably not very valuable in the first place even if they were paid richly. So, for example, if you're in software, you still need a bunch of devs to maintain the server farms and the cloud codebase, whatever, because these are part of the infrastructure of normal society, like roads and plumbing, but you probably don't need a lot of marketing folk right now.

Deep down, on some level, we know that some jobs are "worth" more than others which is why society flipped to the "essential" economy on a dime. However, when times are good, we like to pretend that we need legions of advertising people because no one wants to be the one that breaks the collective illusion, or no one feels like they get anything out of going against the trend. Its a lot easier for people to maintain the charade of civilization than to disrupt it.

I guess, in sum, what I mean is "the market may not know best but society does, in aggregate, indeed society defines what 'best' is", the only conclusion to be derived here is that the market is not society. One can be a proxy for the other but they're only correlated systems, not causative.

This argument sure sounds nice except when you examine literally anything that's happened and look at things from a health perspective instead.

Cashiers have no reason to exist right now and only continue to have to come to work because businesses are very slow to adjust to the world of curbside pickup and banning customers from entering the store. A job being essential solely because it's very hard to adjust business strategies to become much better seems... odd.

Gym trainers provide a ridiculous amount of potential value to helping America reduce its huge obesity problem. Gyms are super valuable... it's just that they are disease nightmares too so they become "non-essential."

Basketball is shut down because people in basketball have to play very close to each other. Baseball is starting back up in a few countries because there's almost no physical contact. Neither job is more essential than the other.

Mechanics will provide no value whatsoever in ten years once everyone is driving electric cars or not driving. However, they are considered essential right now.

Bus drivers are extremely essential to literally saving the world from climate change but there's almost no reason whatsoever to employ a bus driver right now as buses are virus nightmares. Meanwhile, cars (a nightmare device producing huge amounts of pollution) are as important as ever.

And, of course, waiters are literally the least essential people in the world by definition of essential workers under COVID-19. Sorry to waiters and bus drivers, but you are providing nothing to society I guess.

People taking the term "essential worker" and running with it to talk about their socialist theories of the world is sure fun, but it sure does fall apart in a lot of areas.

And on the other side, meat packers are dying terrible deaths because they are deemed essential workers even though meat packing is clearly not an essential part of the United States as people could definitely survive on beans and pasta. There is no universe where meat packers and cashiers are more valuable than bus drivers in this very weird perspective where we have to examine the worth of every job closely. "Essential workers" as defined under COVID-19 is just a very strange category of jobs and breaks down in dozens of areas right away.
 
Last edited:

Mezentine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,969
I have seen the term PMC used to basically just refer to white-collar or "non-service, non-manual" labor, which is...dumb, and unfortunate because it makes the term effectively useless. I don't know that you need the "Professional" prefix, just talk about managers
 

Deleted member 18360

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,844
All specialized or critical disciplines have particular terminology to facilitate the more universal exchange of the complex concepts, systems, frameworks, borne of these critical disciplines. It's generally presumed that someone approaching a field of learning will have to acquaint themselves with these figures or landmarks, and socialist social philosophy is really no more opaque than any other theoretical discipline, if anything it is often less so, and this case is certainly no exception, because...

If you can't grasp that the middle class would recreate the classist division within itself, and that these dynamics playing out within the middle class wouldn't situate themselves in some place of importance within the broader 'Marxian' critical analysis of our current society, and that the primary productive capacities of labor (to actually produce things beneficial for human use) isn't going to be more vaunted or idealized in a new system of production, then I really don't know what to tell you, and I think you're either not trying or you just really don't have a knack for this.
 

Heromanz

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,202
This argument sure sounds nice except when you examine literally anything that's happened and look at things from a health perspective instead.

Cashiers have no reason to exist right now and only continue to have to come to work because businesses are very slow to adjust to the world of curbside pickup and banning customers from entering the store. A job being essential solely because it's very hard to adjust business strategies to become much better seems... odd.

Gym trainers provide a ridiculous amount of potential value to helping America reduce its huge obesity problem. Gyms are super valuable... it's just that they are disease nightmares too so they become "non-essential."

Basketball is shut down because people in basketball have to play very close to each other. Baseball is starting back up in a few countries because there's almost no physical contact. Neither job is more essential than the other.

Mechanics will provide no value whatsoever in ten years once everyone is driving electric cars or not driving. However, they are considered essential right now.

Bus drivers are extremely essential to literally saving the world from climate change but there's almost no reason whatsoever to employ a bus driver right now as buses are virus nightmares. Meanwhile, cars (a nightmare device producing huge amounts of pollution) are as important as ever.

And, of course, waiters are literally the least essential people in the world by definition of essential workers under COVID-19. Sorry to waiters and bus drivers, but you are providing nothing to society I guess.

People taking the term "essential worker" and running with it to talk about their socialist theories of the world is sure fun, but it sure does fall apart in a lot of areas.
This post is a whole bunch of huh. For example gyms and gym trainers are a luxury not a essentials bussiness America's . obesity problem has nothing to do with Americans access to weight equipments has to do with Americans overconsumption of food. And I could go on I mean like we're like even if we go to this mythical electric car system which were not anytime soon you'll still need mechanics.

and baseball and basketball thing makes zero sense. Like a distance apart isn't the reason why one is coming back over the other.
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
This argument sure sounds nice except when you examine literally anything that's happened and look at things from a health perspective instead.
Why would I do this?
Gym trainers provide a ridiculous amount of potential value to helping America reduce its huge obesity problem. Gyms are super valuable... it's just that they are disease nightmares too so they become "non-essential."
Like, I don't get this at all. Its evident that the only person who cares about this "health theory of value" is you and I guess whoever else banging on that obesity epidemic drum. Not that I don't think its a problem, but if people want to kill themselves with obesity then they can feel free to kill themselves. I'm more interested in making sure people who want to stay alive can do so (say, diabetics, insulin, etc) rather than to police people to not kill themselves.

"Gyms are valuable because we have an obesity crisis" is a novel perspective on the issue. It reeks of more free-market logic where everything can be solved with the right financial incentives. Me, I trace the root cause to consumerism. America's economy needs people to overeat and is structured to maximize overeating. No amount of gyms are going to change this. If you thought the now-covid-defunct fitness industry was going to fix the obesity crisis I have a Crossfit subscription to sell you.
 

captmcblack

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,060
Hold up, is this still a discussion on what labor is socially valuable/necessary and what labor isn't (professional/managerial)?

I'm kinda digging this thread and just making sure I'm reading through it properly, I hope people don't stop discussing because the perspective is being challenged! I guess I'd like to know...what labor isn't necessary, at least as things are currently organized in global society?
 

Toxi

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
17,547
I'm kinda digging this thread and just making sure I'm reading through it properly, I hope people don't stop discussing because the perspective is being challenged! I guess I'd like to know...what labor isn't necessary, at least as things are currently organized in global society?
Apparently teaching.
 

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623
"Gyms are valuable because we have an obesity crisis" is a novel perspective on the issue. Me, I trace the root cause to consumerism. America's economy needs people to overeat and is structured to maximize overeating. No amount of gyms are going to change this. If you thought the now-covid-defunct fitness industry was going to fix the obesity crisis I have a Crossfit subscription to sell you.

And I always, always talk about the way that the food supply is fucked up as well. Too many people can't afford good food. A whole lot of people who do grueling manual labor are also obese because of a combination of factors completely outside of their control (genetics) and things mostly outside of their control (how much they are compensated for their work, access to regular health care). Exercise only solves some of the issues related to obesity.
 

Mezentine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,969
The idea that managers are useless is uh...that's a new one for me even in a socialist context. Managers exist because groups of people attempting to do things do not actually run particularly well when structures are completely operationally flat. That this is tied to control of labor and hiring/firing decisions is emergent from the way capitalism and the modern wage economy has developed, but most socialists I know, even the anarchists, don't believe that you never should have an operational hierarchy, just that everyone should share ownership in the overall structure. Directing people effectively is an actual skill.
 

Toxi

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
17,547
And I always, always talk about the way that the food supply is fucked up as well. Too many people can't afford good food. A whole lot of people who do grueling manual labor are also obese because of a combination of factors completely outside of their control (genetics) and things mostly outside of their control (how much they are compensated for their work, access to regular health care). Exercise only solves some of the issues related to obesity.
Exercise solves basically none of it. Food is the main factor in obesity, and as you said the food supply is fucked.

That doesn't mean exercise isn't important for health, but I don't think gyms are anywhere close to a necessity for exercise.
 
OP
OP
ItWasMeantToBe19
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
Why would I do this?

Like, I don't get this at all. Its evident that the only person who cares about this "health theory of value" is you and I guess whoever else banging on that obesity epidemic drum. Not that I don't think its a problem, but if people want to kill themselves with obesity then they can feel free to kill themselves. I'm more interested in making sure people who want to stay alive can do so (say, diabetics, insulin, etc) rather than to police people to not kill themselves.

"Gyms are valuable because we have an obesity crisis" is a novel perspective on the issue. It reeks of more free-market logic where everything can be solved with the right financial incentives. Me, I trace the root cause to consumerism. America's economy needs people to overeat and is structured to maximize overeating. No amount of gyms are going to change this. If you thought the now-covid-defunct fitness industry was going to fix the obesity crisis I have a Crossfit subscription to sell you.

Okay so do you think everyone in the Gulf States is as fat as Americans because they care a lot about capitalism.

Or is because the people mostly don't work in manual labor and use low wage workers and people in the Gulf States have money and tasty food is fattening.

But let's go beyond gyms since you hate gyms I guess.

During COVID-19, bus drivers provide zero value whatsoever to society.

Outside of COVID-19, bus drivers are ridiculously valuable to society.

Do you see how weird it is just to determine the value of a job based on whether or not it can be done during a virus?
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
During COVID-19, bus drivers provide zero value whatsoever to society.
I rely on public transportation to get around, so this is a weird take you won't see me agreeing with. I think they have lots of value and should form the bulk of traffic on the streets right now. What is your point here actually?

Gulf state obesity is outside of my area of experience. My instinct says they care a lot about global capitalism for what I should think are obvious reasons.
 
OP
OP
ItWasMeantToBe19
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
I rely on public transportation to get around, so this is a weird take you won't see me agreeing with. I think they have lots of value and should form the bulk of traffic on the streets right now. What is your point here actually?

Public transit ridership is down hugely right now and whenever I go driving, I see the buses around my university town as almost entirely empty. People in Wuhan (where I don't live to be clear but as another example) are buying tons of cars because they're so scared of the bus and train right now.

Buses are an extremely efficient way of transporting people on a low amount of energy. However, buses are a playground for viruses as they include a lot of people closely together in an air conditioned space.
 

Mezentine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,969
I rely on public transportation to get around, so this is a weird take you won't see me agreeing with. I think they have lots of value and should form the bulk of traffic on the streets right now. What is your point here actually?
I'm a public transit guy, I take buses and the train everywhere, I don't even own a car, and I do agree with his point here: if right now you have a choice, and can afford to choose, between driving and taking the bus, you should drive. The idea that a pandemic exposes who's "really valuable" and who's "really not" is a nice and clean idea but I think the reality is messier then that: the pandemic exposes who is valuable and who is not in circumstances where people are limiting their exposure to other people, even family members, as much as possible, and parents have children stuck at home all day, and lots of other things that make this specific

I have a bit of an issue with the people who go from "This reveals that service workers are much more essential than we claim, and therefore deserve much higher compensation and protection" (true) to "And all of the people who are now able to work from home have been revealed to be sham-workers who don't actually matter to anything important" which is...not true.
 

Heromanz

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,202
Okay so do you think everyone in the Gulf States is as fat as Americans because they care a lot about capitalism.

Or is because the people mostly don't work in manual labor and use low wage workers and people in the Gulf States have money and tasty food is fattening.

But let's go beyond gyms since you hate gyms I guess.

During COVID-19, bus drivers provide zero value whatsoever to society.

Outside of COVID-19, bus drivers are ridiculously valuable to society.

Do you see how weird it is just to determine the value of a job based on whether or not it can be done during a virus?
but America's obesity problem has nothing to do with access to gym equipment that's not the reason why Americans are fat as fuck. So gym are not essential business they are a luxury.
 

wandering

flâneur
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
2,136
9781501143311-l.jpg






Its a real idea in the sense that there are a lot of worthless jobs out there that only exist to give people something to do and they don't really add value to society. Notice the delineation between "essential workers" and other jobs in the wake of COVID-19. How important a job is to the function of society seems to bear no close relationship with its monetary recompense. "PMC" encapsulates this concept neatly to describe the vast universe of management jobs that only exist to soak up unemployment.

I think you're letting your distaste for that German commie color your view of the idea of the PMC.

That is not to say the only "real jobs" are rugged manual labor jobs where you lug girders and wear an overall and a massive mustache but the concept of "value" is central to a lot of socialist thought.


I get the idea, but I dislike the notion that people's value should be predicated on how much they contribute to the economy.
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
Public transit ridership is down hugely right now and whenever I go driving, I see the buses around my university town as almost entirely empty. People in Wuhan (where I don't live to be clear but as another example) are buying tons of cars because they're so scared of the bus and train right now.

Buses are an extremely efficient way of transporting people on a low amount of energy. However, buses are a playground for viruses as they include a lot of people closely together in an air conditioned space.
Buses are filled with essential low income workers where I'm from (nyc)
 

Mezentine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,969
Buses are filled with essential low income workers where I'm from (nyc)
Sure but that's an artifact of current inequalities, if all of those service workers owned electric cars the objectively right thing to do now is not sit in a closed environment with twenty other people for half an hour during a respiratory pandemic.