The original release wasn't even made by Valve, and it was a disaster on PC as well, then Valve stepped up and fixed the game, updates have everything to do with the state of the game.
CoD lost a lot of userbase after MW2, they probably still sell decently, but the franchise certainly way smaller on PC.
Standard COD MP been dead on PC ever since COD4 something, but I believe Warzone is quite popular
My point is that if you release a game basically dead on arrival, I don't think the main reason it failed is update costs. Whatever the PC version was at the time, console versions were much, much worse.
Just look at the reaction to Prey (2017) on consoles.
I can't speak to CSGO specifically, but most of the time when a game "feels bad" on controllers it's because they don't have huge amounts of auto-aim guiding it for you.
Has anyone said that? Say something is designed for or plays better with m&kb, doesn't mean controllers are for trash noobs, but for some reason people are acting like thats what being said.
Its certainly been implied several times.
Come on be an adult, no one is saying that. Like at least give one example, then maybe someone could help you with your misunderstanding. M&kb and gyro allow for better accuracy, and some games you need better better accuracy. Saying you need auto aim with controllers isn't saying PC gamers are better, but theres a reason its on by default.
I'm saying mouse and keyboard is a better fit for some games than unassisted analog sticks. Adjustments would need to be made to made on consoles in such cases.
post 9 said in order to play a PC centric fps you need auto aim, most people would agree and use auto aim.
It really is weird it's still console exclusive, doesn't make sense. They should port it to PC before Infinite comes out especially considering how fucking heavy and large the Halo lore is, people on PC will play Infinite and won't understand a fucking thing.
Most people who have played Halo 5 do agree that the multiplayer is one of the best in the franchise and I'm so glad, because it really is.
While the games are wildly different, I think the massive success Siege became on consoles is proof that that there's an audience on console for slower, more tactical FPS games than COD, Overwatch and the likes. I'd still say it'd need to be a CS game tailored to consoles rather than just a basic port, but it could be done.
It's all crossplay now so it doesn't really matter. Every match I play it's a mix of all 3.
You misunderstand. I did not say skills would not improve as time spent in with Eternal increases, nor did I say getting skilled at the game with a controller is impossible.
Prey had notoriously bad input latency on both consoles and felt like shit. That has nothing to do with it being a FPS on console. For the record I bought Prey day one and never had a problem with playing it although you could definitely feel the sluggish controls.
My point about Prey was that they felt the need to change enemy behavior to make them easier to hit.
